Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander - page 128. (Read 512674 times)

Coming VERY soon. Hold tight. 

Any news?!

 

Song for all Fudders

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDYfaR9TdzI

great I'm glad to hear you said it was you and also I'm sorry about your car accident I just wish ddev's would say who they were you post as mc as if you dosent have anything to do with the coin and I'm glad to hear your have so much btc in cs not counterstrike
I just wish dev's would post iv lost a lot of money and would like some updates

Thanks GU. You're a class act. We are going places with this coin!

Well thanks for the retractions, but I do not seem to see whats the whole point of this ?

also for those that want the full un retracted version
http://www.forum.smartlaunch.net/Topic12966-9-1.aspx?Highlight=gamingunleashed
( as if i care about emails I have over 12k unread emails in my hotmail box ATM !!! )
http://i60.tinypic.com/71ii6p.png




Yes GamingUnleashed is my Bussiness account and MasterCATZ is my gaming name ? / whats the problem ??

Gamingunleashed is also the name I use on troll box's BTC-e / poloinex / cryptsy and the name the team know's me as.

ok I am now a little more un-anonymous now and if you were one of the few people to download the mtgox DOX torrent you will now have my photo ID / car registration / Power Bill / and home adress !!  
Hell if you know my Country and look up the Company Name you will very quickly find me
( actually I only just thought of this *facepalm* shoulda stuck to my other alias shit happens )


I also have a shait load of BTC untouched in coldstorage from mining in the early days ... had to give the gaming rigs something to do when they sat their !!!

and if you notice I only became active in BTC since BTC hit 1k USD , as I was resently in an car accident and confinded to bed for a few weeks during this time I  stumbled across bitcoin value = gold .. and went hey I used to mine that a few years back  ...
and here is the real kicker , MT GOX NEVER acepted my registration so I NEVER LOST MY BTC !!! as BTC-e took me in

infact if I opened up my coldstorage CRYPT could be .1 right now if I wanted too and the team knows this !!  


Their I self DOX'd my self .. please don't egg my chopper ..


PPS. still waiting on MF

Block which IP's? It's peer to peer. They'd have to block way too many IPs to get anywhere, with massive collateral damage.

I don't agree that an internal ledger is a viable way to anonymise for the reasons I gave: They are too easy to compromise. Too big targets. Especially if you're a government and can serve subpoenas.  Many, independent nodes is better, but then too you have the problem that the nodes needs to be trustworthy, even though a compromised or unreliable node would cause less damage.

Ultimately I don't think true 100% anonymity will be feasible. *Maybe* theoretically possible, but not even that is certain, but the constraints necessary to e.g. avoid weaknesses down to network analysis and timing attacks are so severe that I doubt any coin will manage to get there. At least not the first 10 tries. The question we're left with is how much anonymity is enough for it to be worthwhile over just trusting a suitable exchange.

Sunday

15 volume  just on mp


been 30k for almost a week

Holly shnikes!! <30K sat.

<12 BTC daily volume.

This coin really is dying. I guess people are starting to wake up.

Very good points! I agree with you here. I do have coins at that address owned by Cryptsy and yes this would seem the case. My point was to create something outside of Cryptsy that I would hope CryptCoin is working on. I was just showing how it transpires currently and I think this would be the best way to Anonymize. You wouldn't need a mixer just an internal ledger that bases its address creation from your main wallet. So that only the send or receive addresses would link to you and relate itself to the BlockChain to create the sum of your wallet. The Sender and Receiver would be the only ones able to access their transaction info.

If some entity really wants to defeat a coin wouldn't they just block the IP's on the ISP? Authorities could shut off access.

My main question about the Sabotage would be why Attious didn't divulge the secret to what CryptCoin was working on and the exact details. If that person really wanted to ruin the coin this would be one of their options. Which didn't happen.

*You* don't have *any* coins at that address. The address, assuming your description is correct, is not yours but Cryptsy's. This entirely defeats a significant purpose of anon coins: To make your balance and transactions hard or impossible to determine.

Obscuring your balance and transactions from casual observers is easy, as you've "discovered": Just use a service that sufficiently mixes funds and moves them into addresses that act as pools. Like any exchange.

The problem is that if you use just a small number of such services from a small pool of such services, while you have protected yourself against casual, unprivileged adversaries, you may be *more* vulnerable to certain classes of adversaries, such as organized crime (Cryptsy will be a much more attractive target than CryptoNick; the payoff of hacking Cryptsy would be far greater) or governments (whether via a subpoena, or surveillance), or simply insiders at these services. You also face the problem of substantial trust problems related to these services.

It should be quite clear that for a lot of people who support crypto-coins, anonymity just against unprivileged observers is not seen as sufficient. "Real anonymity" against privileged actors is essential to be attractive. Whether it is to avoid tax authorities, or buy drugs, or being able to support controversial political organizations (whether good or bad causes) that may be illegal in some countries, or just for the principle of freedom from intervention.

Not least because those who wants anonymity protections against casual observers, as you've demonstrated, already have plenty of solutions in terms of the exchanges and other services.

If this wasn't the case, the "solution" would simply be a small-ish network of mixers with retained ledgers and an app that would distribute your balance, and use an API to request addresses for "blind" deposits to your accounts, and nobody would bother spending lots of time trying to come up with better anonymity.

Thanks NRD! Much appreciated. 

Prom said CRYPTCOIN will go up again...  I guess when it does, you will believe him next time he says a coin is going up..

The old ideal of the open-source community to develop good software that is free for everybody does not apply to cryptocurrency development because if a coin publishes all its new features immediately, there is constantly the risk that somebody will clone and hype it for own profits without contributing to the alt community, leaving the people who deserve the real credits empty handed. We have seen some of this happening already.

On the other hand, trust based "anomymous" features are not the way to go in today's &ig &rother society either but in order for dev teams to code in peace and quiet on their projects and be rewarded accordingly over time there has to be a compromise to the open sourceness of the code.

I personally think that for example XC's way of delayed publishing the code is a good compromise between the open and closed source model.

I am not a Fudder, I was caught up in the FUD and I ask questions that sound like FUD. Since I am trying to make out what is going on since I have money at stake. So I want to see the coin Succeed but I ask the questions that any Investor should have answered. If these questions could be answered by the DEV's I could either figure that they are lying, or take them at face value, but at least I would have the opportunity to hear their side towards my concerns.

But yeah I will have to just sit and wait. I found the info out on my own and by asking the Dev's to show their wallets. I investigated how to use the blockchain in case they did post their wallets. I saw that my own address was not showing my total coin. I went on from there and expanded on what must be happening at Cryptsy.

So this should be the way that it is implemented. I don't care about secrecy since it is already functioning at Cryptsy anyways. So if it is a variant or a stand alone solution it will be better than Cryptsy to boot. Since the source has to be made public anyways on GitHub then who cares since my investment can be eroded by a similar coin that comes out later.

If there are investors that look at my statements here and realize that I have found a viable way to create ANON functionality then they should also realize that now is a great time to Hedge their positions if they bought in during the Sabotage/Fraud.

If you bought at the Peak you can now average your position by buying low. Lets say you bought 500 coin at .0027 well buy 1000 at .00029 and your new position is .00109333.

Knowing that Koolio works with Cryptsy now should make this the quickest coin to the solution and have the proper solution to boot. So my posts should engage buyers to buy. Especially since you can Buy for WAAAY less than you can Mine right now. Look at the price of GHash rental servers and know Crypt is a Steal.

Any answers to my questions would only serve to benefit the Coin and the Founders anyways, of course... unless we honestly find out that they are just scamming everyone.

Do you understand the concept of flogging a dead horse? Your straw man arguments are running a bit thin.

• Devs have stated that they would like to keep their concept for "hard to trace" features private until it has been implemented. This is to prevent the idea from being stolen by some random crypto punk (every time I hear your argument for transparency in development this is what comes to mind)
• Comparing development of PGP or OpenSSL to a cryptocurrency? GTFO
• Mindfox never has and never will speak of "true anonymity" through the current implementation of the Bitcoin protocol.

I don't always throw all my eggs in one basket, but when I do, it's because Mindfox promises to deliver his best shot at creating an "anonymous" coin. Hell he's so honest he won't even call it that himself because he know's it's not possible.

PB dumbass go spread FUD about coins that outright lie about being anonymous. If you're so concerned with fighting a war against "bad investments" or dishonest development of said feature. This is the first coin that actually had the balls to come out and say that true anonymity is impossible and the best we can hope for is "very hard to trace". If your gripe is with a coin showing no transparency in their development of something they claim to be anonymous, it surely must lie with coins other than Crypt, as Mindfox has never claimed anonymity. Although I seriously doubt that's where your true issue with Crypt lies. Don't bother responding to this either, as you're now on my blocked list.

knightlife999: Keep up the great work poking holes in these ludicrous claims, I had to throw my 2 crypt in

Um... what is your guess on how many coins I have at that address? No Guess? That is not the total coins. You must be stumped? It is truly ANON! I even sent a Donation from that Wallet without it showing on the wallet! It shows as an Address Generated by Cryptsy associated with my Address on Cryptsy. Total ANON! And it works too since you think pointing to the BlockChain told me how many coins I have at that address. Thanks for playing along and proving my point. It really works don't be stumped or think I am playing with you. Trust me it is for real total ANON!

Why nobody contribute at this topic?!
Please keep voting
Vote for Best Anonymous Coin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568166.220