Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander - page 129. (Read 512692 times)

is that's right mastercatz

Looking forward to your team's forthcoming release and the continued growth of Crypt!

What I can tell you is the team are amazed when ever one of these mini pumps do happen,
as these almost ALWAYS coincide with when we have an planed meeting with the dev's / investors.
@ X EST time / date

This means two things

#1 their is still an leak in the system
(hence why no information is being released )

#2 someone really want's to get their hands on the cheap coins first, before the meeting ends and if we move onto the next phase.
( which when we do act their will be many panic buyers )

Their are indeed big investors ready.


I still hold a lot of coins I bought in  200K range because I know where this coin is heading

(over 100 BTC worth ~60k coins that I had paid an premium price for during the rally, this is excluding pre Mintpal coins that were snapped at around 9k range and coins bought on bounces)

I bag held to allow panic sellers to sell with less loss's.
I have also been snapping up the cheap 30k coins, and slowly converting my LTC into CRYPT  around 0.02 ~ 0.03 ranges

I must admit CRYPT suffered greater losse's then what we originally thought CRYPT FUD attack would have done
We know that keeping silent is not helping either, but getting project completed is on top if the to do list.
even reading through Attious leaked PM's it seems he was also expecting an quicker rebound to the ATH of 500k after his FUD campaign.



   

To everyone that has been selling the past 2 weeks for prices that are clearly below what you originally paid. Mark my words. You will regret it greatly. Chasing the next "flavor of the week" coin and losing a little bit of your balance each time is a waste of time and money. Find a coin with potential value and buy into it. You can't get rich in 2 days. That's an immature expectation. This coin will surprise everyone who has sold off early and/or denounced it. I hope you all read this and decide to join in with the rally that is about to take place. If you don't, that is fine, but you will only end up panic buying and miss a large portion of the move.

Exactly the question I was going to ask him. I've asked it before and the answer is always vague and unsatisfactory. This coin's volume is low and he still posts here. There are many other coins that claim to be anonymous. He never posts on the other coin's threads. Only here. He has a specific bone to pick with this coin. Many people develop products in secret. Just because the devs won't let you peer review their work before it's complete, doesn't mean it's not going to be a great product.

so why don't you go and attack DRK and any other coins (VRC/XC/CLoak.etc) that is claiming True Anonymity ?

I've already answered these questions in my previous posts.

Q: The question is who are you?
I'm just another anonymous internet account - just like you.

Q: A DRK coin fanatic?
No. I also don't believe that coinjoin based solutions can bring anything close to "true anonymity".

Q: Dev team member of another scared to shit coin?
No.

Q: How come you don't post with your real account?  Are you scared we'll look at your past comments and discover who you really are?
Sorry, but this is my only bitcointalk account.


I agree that being secretive about one's identity can be huge red flag. But this then also applies to members of this coin team and developers. They're mostly anonymous, don't forget that.

Quit avoiding the question.

I think that you're not perceiving my posts correctly. You perceive them them as "anti-cryptcoin". But they are actually "pro-cryptcoin". Cryptcoin has extremely "secret" and non-transparent development. My opinion is that development (especially of anonymous features) needs to be open and transparent. This is the goal of my posts and I think that this can be very positive for cryptcoin.

Quite large number of widely used security solutions (PGP, tor, OpenSSL etc.) are developed in very open and transparent way.

I have no problem with pumps & dumps. It is not my job to protect people from pump & dumps.

But I have problems when people start abusing "anonymity features" (for example, claiming that something is anonymous but in reality it is not). This may have consequences that are far worse than people losing majority of their money in "bad investments".

I know who is prom from btc-e trollbox. But he complained that people had created many fake accounts. And this may be one of these fake accounts.

I think that no one should believe random anonymous guys on the internet (this - among others - also includes me, of course). People need to check facts for themselves. And then make their own judgements.

The question is who are you? A DRK coin fanatic?  Dev team member of another scared to shit coin?  Who knows? You have no reputation on this forum and you just seem to be focused on the attacking the fundamental structures of our community.

How come you don't post with your real account?  Are you scared we'll look at your past comments and discover who you really are?

The fact you are so secretive about your own IDENTITY is a huge "red" flag.

excellent question !

+11110000 couldn't have said better  

Pump and dumps happen on any speculative market, especially cryptocurrencies. Quit acting like you're trying to be a hero because you're no better than the pump and dumpers if all you do is try to destroy this coin, you are actually worse since you're trying to screw over ALL of the investors speculating on this coin. This mostly goes to pbremen01 because I know CryptoNick used to be a fudder and found out some special features of this coin, now all he has to try to fud is trying to prove that this coin is just a pump and dump, why not go talk about LTC since it's the second biggest pump and dump of all cryptocurrencies?

Just ignore pbremen01 because we all know he panic sold too low and trying to buy back cheaper, that or he's just a really ignorant fart, I think it's the latter.

You are asking who Prom is? Who are you pbremen01? Paul Bremen, Patrick Bremen, Peter Bremen, Phil Bremen? You ask why anyone should listen to Prometheus? Why should anyone listen to you?

Doubtful. Big players buy in has started. Wait until early next week. 

Who is willing to stop fudding and leave this thread instead of trying to lower price so their buy orders get filled? Why else are you here to fud? Because you don't like pump and dumps? You must not like bitcoin or any kind of cryptocurrency then. If you want to protect people from pump and dumps, go start an occupy wall street protest and show the world how naive you are about capitalism and the free market.

um http://chainz.cryptoid.info/crypt/address.dws?EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca.htm  ?

I already came up with the best ANON solution and no one can tell me how many Crypt Coin I have at this address:
EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca

I can keep my coins ANON and I can even use them ANON from inside Cryptsy as I proved with my Donation. So all that is needed is an internal address (EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca) attached to an internal ledger which can send using a wallet address created and only used one time for each transaction. Then that address is always linked internally to add up the amount for the internal address.

So address 1 equals +10.00 Crypt
Address 2 equals +20.00 Crypt
Address 3 equals -5.00 Crypt

The internal ledger keeps the running total so currently internally it has 25.00 Crypt in it from 3 transactions that only link to external addresses which the Ledger knows it created for my specific address EmfZo6AvDPmySMxgty6fKJay4MkH1hMLca which could still be zero if I had not sent coin from mining to it.

This already works, if it isn't stable then Cryptsy wouldn't be secure. Cryptsy may not realize what it has or this could be what Crypt is working on. I found this solution after I checked my Crypt Address and it is no where near the amount of Crypt I own. Now that I exposed this option we can talk openly about its implementation since I think it is the best possible fully anon option. And you could turn it on and off having the accept secure transaction like it states in the whitepaper.

The capability for P&D is so obvious though, no response and we all know how easy it would have been to pull this P&D off.

  Me

  Me

  Me

CRYPT FTW!

+1