Oh I respect the choice, I wasn't sure so thanks for clearing that up. But the fact that it is Anon would make it so difficult to trace that MindFox could make a satoshi disappear into his wallet and no one would know the difference. But I have heard hard to trace used so this may be different and debugging works better with this not so anon solution?
And I would have to agree MindFox is smart to not give his code and keys to the devs since they already got locked out once.
You can debug to check the amount of coins, but hey.... it's fastest to use your brain to compare how many coins you had and how many coins you send (ho wait... the amount shown in the GUI can be falsified, then you have to use a debugger)
Anyway you can debug anything, even your own transactions (since it's client side
)
If you don't know that's possible to debug you own transaction i think your security skills is not enough in order to read and understand each line of the source, then to be able to know if a function can be exploited by a hacker or not.
Sorry but it's true, the most part of the people who want the code source are trying to play the pros by compiling the code themselves, or they are just checking the blocks, but finally this is the only one thing that they are able to do with a source code. They are free ok, but they don't have to intervene where they are not able to work and if they have a problem with that they have nothing other to do that moving away (or watching/telling their opinions) instead of talking bullshit for nothing good.
ps: nothing is personal, i talk for everybody but answer to you at the same time.
fontas, prom, boomsling etc all act innocent when the next coin dies. Never their fault they will say... LoL. No words man. Someday they'll get burned bad.
They will probably pump keycoin again some day aswell. 
[/center]
this made my day. Nice NSA360 
at the post above
