Topic: [ANN][DCM] Digital Commerce 1.35 Mil coins 100% POS/Soon Anon/Accounting wallet. - page 42. (Read 82589 times)
June 06, 2014, 08:55:29 PM
Thank you for your kind words kahir, it is compliments like this that make our team reach for the highest goals and achieve them through professional persistence. This growing community makes me very confident of DCM's success.
June 06, 2014, 08:46:36 PM
all the fuss about poloniex is worried people or investors ... who see the price already drop from where they bought ...
poloniex will add DCM in time ... i KNOW that pusoni or whatever his name is really DECENT person ... look at issues happen to poloniex he always fix and people like him ...
most of price drop was people who ride waves ... got on DCM then sold to get in VRC or whatever is hot now
DCM already done what anothers coins do in MONTHS ... and its already been couple of days
poloniex will add DCM in time ... i KNOW that pusoni or whatever his name is really DECENT person ... look at issues happen to poloniex he always fix and people like him ...
most of price drop was people who ride waves ... got on DCM then sold to get in VRC or whatever is hot now
DCM already done what anothers coins do in MONTHS ... and its already been couple of days
June 06, 2014, 08:41:25 PM
Buy support on Bittrex is building.....
June 06, 2014, 08:23:10 PM
busoni has, in the past, mentioned certain "standards" for coins to be listed on his exchange. I've seen him ask about the innovation a coin presents, and I also recall that as one of the fields in the request form. This is certainly an admirable quality, but I have to question its application given the hyped, pump and dump clone coins regularly added to his exchange. Perhaps he's sour over DCM's IPO success, with the epic failure of the Poloniex backed MIL IPO adding salt to the wound?
I'm not entirely sure what standards Poloniex use. I mean, after I saw Colbert coin listed there, it was almost like... okay, any coin can be listed. No idea if btc (nice way to say it would be a 'bounty') passed hands, but there have certainly been coins listed on Poloniex in the past where you scratch your head wondering how it got listed.
Sometimes I think with the death of Cryptorush + CoinEx, that Polo is in a position of a bit too much power nowadays. It's sort of the middle gateway between Bittrex (and lower exchanges) to MP/Cryptsy. It can be bypassed, but only typically by voting, and that sometimes takes a bit of time. There is definitely a need for more mid-sized exchanges, just to provide more options.
Anyway, I see no reason for DCM to not eventually be added based on its merits. It has an active dev team, which by itself, is more than probably a lot of current coins on their exchange.
June 06, 2014, 08:22:13 PM
busoni has, in the past, mentioned certain "standards" for coins to be listed on his exchange. I've seen him ask about the innovation a coin presents, and I also recall that as one of the fields in the request form. This is certainly an admirable quality, but I have to question its application given the hyped, pump and dump clone coins regularly added to his exchange. Perhaps he's sour over DCM's IPO success, with the epic failure of the Poloniex backed MIL IPO adding salt to the wound?
I don't want to restart a new "bash another coin thread" (far from it) and have nothing against MIL, but personally I have also wondered why MIL was chosen for an IPO when DCM was on the table. I guess we'll never know but I do know that we sent a very solid and detailed proposal to Poloniex.I don't think anyone at Poloniex is sour over DCM's successful IPO, I think they just want to ensure that future IPOs are received positively and sell out. Unsuccessful IPOs hurt the entire altcoin market so it's good that they're taking steps to ensure that future IPOs meet certain minimum standards.
The problem with asking for innovation is that what does a new (for example) algorithm ensure? IMHO nothing. You sometimes hear people say "xxx is a good coin because it's X11/POS/whatever" To me that's like saying USD is a good currency because it's printed on good paper. Yes, those are nice things to have but in the end that (I'm pretty sure) those things don't give a coin value. What gives a coin value is real-world usability. Anything else is IMHO just a cloud of smoke.
I strongly agree with the bolded part. It's why I find the need to vet coins through this requirement baffling, especially in light of the coins that fail time and again to deliver on these promises.
June 06, 2014, 07:40:17 PM
busoni has, in the past, mentioned certain "standards" for coins to be listed on his exchange. I've seen him ask about the innovation a coin presents, and I also recall that as one of the fields in the request form. This is certainly an admirable quality, but I have to question its application given the hyped, pump and dump clone coins regularly added to his exchange. Perhaps he's sour over DCM's IPO success, with the epic failure of the Poloniex backed MIL IPO adding salt to the wound?
I don't want to restart a new "bash another coin thread" (far from it) and have nothing against MIL, but personally I have also wondered why MIL was chosen for an IPO when DCM was on the table. I guess we'll never know but I do know that we sent a very solid and detailed proposal to Poloniex.I don't think anyone at Poloniex is sour over DCM's successful IPO, I think they just want to ensure that future IPOs are received positively and sell out. Unsuccessful IPOs hurt the entire altcoin market so it's good that they're taking steps to ensure that future IPOs meet certain minimum standards.
The problem with asking for innovation is that what does a new (for example) algorithm ensure? IMHO nothing. You sometimes hear people say "xxx is a good coin because it's X11/POS/whatever" To me that's like saying USD is a good currency because it's printed on good paper. Yes, those are nice things to have but in the end that (I'm pretty sure) those things don't give a coin value. What gives a coin value is real-world usability. Anything else is IMHO just a cloud of smoke.
June 06, 2014, 07:39:46 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
busoni has, in the past, mentioned certain "standards" for coins to be listed on his exchange. I've seen him ask about the innovation a coin presents, and I also recall that as one of the fields in the request form. This is certainly an admirable quality, but I have to question its application given the hyped, pump and dump clone coins regularly added to his exchange. Perhaps he's sour over DCM's IPO success, with the epic failure of the Poloniex backed MIL IPO adding salt to the wound?
Regardless, DCM needs another market, and Poloniex is the natural progression. Members of the DCM dev team should visit their trollbox to present DCM as a legitimate investment over the high risk vaporware coins that will cease to exist next week. I've seen DCM mentioned on occasion there, but rarely is it anything more substantial than spam and it is usually drowned out by cheers for the pump coin of the day.
It's great that DCM is backed by experienced and visible devs committed to merchant adoption. However, momentum should not wither and be wasted, following the success of the DCM IPO. It's a fickle and demanding market. Quietly chipping away in the background is a surefire road to obscurity.
I promise you I have been there 4 times a day and in their irc, I spoke to Oldmankid, and have advertised our thread in the trollbox. This is where Qiwoman came in from and a few others. I'm trying to help alleviate this polo issue and wrote Busoni a long PM 45 mins ago as well. Please have faith in our team, we have over delivered in the past 3-4 days if anything. No coin has multiple merchants and a very well known gaming dev on day 3 of it's existence. Vox wasn't even sold for Dogecoin until over 1 month in, and they are the most hyped coin in crypto history. I'm not trying to sound like a jerk, but like Scotty said on Star Trek "We're givin her all she's got Captain!!"
June 06, 2014, 07:28:54 PM
I support the DCM team.
They're a great bunch of hard working individuals.
I think the coin is going to do great long-term. Will hold my coins and stake.
They're a great bunch of hard working individuals.
I think the coin is going to do great long-term. Will hold my coins and stake.
TY deadly, this means a lot to me personally.
June 06, 2014, 07:15:56 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
busoni has, in the past, mentioned certain "standards" for coins to be listed on his exchange. I've seen him ask about the innovation a coin presents, and I also recall that as one of the fields in the request form. This is certainly an admirable quality, but I have to question its application given the hyped, pump and dump clone coins regularly added to his exchange. Perhaps he's sour over DCM's IPO success, with the epic failure of the Poloniex backed MIL IPO adding salt to the wound?
Regardless, DCM needs another market, and Poloniex is the natural progression. Members of the DCM dev team should visit their trollbox to present DCM as a legitimate investment over the high risk vaporware coins that will cease to exist next week. I've seen DCM mentioned on occasion there, but rarely is it anything more substantial than spam and it is usually drowned out by cheers for the pump coin of the day.
It's great that DCM is backed by experienced and visible devs committed to merchant adoption. However, momentum should not wither and be wasted, following the success of the DCM IPO. It's a fickle and demanding market. Quietly chipping away in the background is a surefire road to obscurity.
June 06, 2014, 06:52:54 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
I think you try to made a fool of us, im pretty sure that such a exchane exactly know what is DCM and when IPO was over,
I think that Poloniex dont want add this coin for some reason and DEV exactly know which reason it is,
and they try to hide it,
it's my personal opinion
Yes, you've finally discovered our cunning plan: we have already set sail towards a remote island and plan on living comfortably off the IPO money for the rest of our lives and have 3 meals of steak, champagne and chocolate cake every day. In our free time we will build gigantic robots to conquer the world once we get tired of steak, champagne and chocolate cake.
For the humor-impaired: Of course this is NOT the case.
As someone on the team: no, there is no real reason that I or anybody else on the team knows of which would prevent us from getting listed on Poloniex.
really smart answer from DEV
I expected some serious answer, but ok im not DEV you are the one,
What I'm trying to tell you is that noone on our team knows why Poloniex won't list us (IF that is really the case). Stop looking for conspiracies where there aren't any.
June 06, 2014, 06:39:59 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
I think you try to made a fool of us, im pretty sure that such a exchane exactly know what is DCM and when IPO was over,
I think that Poloniex dont want add this coin for some reason and DEV exactly know which reason it is,
and they try to hide it,
it's my personal opinion
Yes, you've finally discovered our cunning plan: we have already set sail towards a remote island and plan on living comfortably off the IPO money for the rest of our lives and have 3 meals of steak, champagne and chocolate cake every day. In our free time we will build gigantic robots to conquer the world once we get tired of steak, champagne and chocolate cake.
For the humor-impaired: Of course this is NOT the case.
As someone on the team: no, there is no real reason that I or anybody else on the team knows of which would prevent us from getting listed on Poloniex.
really smart answer from DEV
I expected some serious answer, but ok im not DEV you are the one,
June 06, 2014, 06:20:46 PM
Only just started paying attention to DCM..the price is so high, am I too late?
High price, you say? DCM is worth under $ 200,000. We are number 80 on coinmarketcap. DCM is the best business opportunity in cryptoland, I saw in months. I bought in big in the IPO and I am not selling 1 coin at all.
DCM has the potential to break $100 per coin considering it's supply and that only will put it on 3rd place at coinmarketcap
June 06, 2014, 06:20:34 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
I think you try to made a fool of us, im pretty sure that such a exchane exactly know what is DCM and when IPO was over,
I think that Poloniex dont want add this coin for some reason and DEV exactly know which reason it is,
and they try to hide it,
it's my personal opinion
Yes, you've finally discovered our cunning plan: we have already set sail towards a remote island and plan on living comfortably off the IPO money for the rest of our lives and have 3 meals of steak, champagne and chocolate cake every day. In our free time we will build gigantic robots to conquer the world once we get tired of steak, champagne and chocolate cake.
For the humor-impaired: Of course this is NOT the case.
As someone on the team: no, there is no real reason that I or anybody else on the team knows of which would prevent us from getting listed on Poloniex.
June 06, 2014, 06:13:03 PM
Nice job, maybe try making the font a solid white so it stands out better against the dark background.
June 06, 2014, 06:08:04 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
I told him it's alrteady had it's IPO and he said "i have asked for clarification on that".
They know now that it already is past its IPO, don't want to bug em too much, will ask tomorrow again or dev can throw them a message.
June 06, 2014, 06:04:35 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
I think you try to made a fool of us, im pretty sure that such a exchane exactly know what is DCM and when IPO was over,
I think that Poloniex dont want add this coin for some reason and DEV exactly know which reason it is,
and they try to hide it,
it's my personal opinion
June 06, 2014, 05:58:45 PM
Only just started paying attention to DCM..the price is so high, am I too late?
High price, you say? DCM is worth under $ 200,000. We are number 80 on coinmarketcap. DCM is the best business opportunity in cryptoland, I saw in months. I bought in big in the IPO and I am not selling 1 coin at all.
DCM has the potential to break $100 looking at the coin supply
June 06, 2014, 05:56:16 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
This explains quite a bit now, thank you guys for doing some digging for us. I'll contact Poloniex again and let them know we are way past the IPO stage, I'm not sure why they think otherwise.
June 06, 2014, 05:54:28 PM
So i asked the Poloniex dev to review the DCM request this is what he said:
"yep and did you read our requirement on ICD? https://poloniex.com/icdrequirements"
and
"all ICD will need to meet those requirements at all times to be added here"
"yep and did you read our requirement on ICD? https://poloniex.com/icdrequirements"
and
"all ICD will need to meet those requirements at all times to be added here"
These requirements are for new IPOs.
June 06, 2014, 05:48:47 PM
he thinks its an IPO...
Jump to: