Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 12. (Read 1201695 times)

Some New features:

- This release introduces the privacy features based on CoinShuffle++.
CoinShuffle++ cooperative mixing features are added. Through this process, tickets may be bought from outputs in a CoinJoin transaction. CoinJoin change is not anonymized, and must be isolated to a different account and mixed down at standard amount values.
This implementation of CoinShuffle++ currently requires a central server as a coordination point between all peers in a mix. The Decred project operates a server at https://cspp.decred.org/, and more details about correct usage can be found there. Anyone is able to host their own server and configure their wallets to use it, but for the largest anonymity set it is best that most people remain using the same server.

- It also includes a preliminary Lightning Network implementation by matheusd. Most of the other work was completed by vctt and a new member of the team, bgptr. Many thanks to them for their hard work on this release.
This initial support should give users a chance to experience the capabilities of LN while we can also collect user feedback about how to best improve their experience with documentation or help.
To enable LN support, please set the new option "ln_enabled" to "true" in your config.json.

- Window size responsiveness has been added to most of the pages to allow for graceful change from small, medium and large screen sizes. When in "small" mode, the sidebar is moved to the bottom of the screen much like a mobile app.
When in "medium" mode, the sidebar is collapsed shows only icons. When in "large" mode, the sidebar is fully expanded and all the fields are fully shown.

- Dark mode (tonality) has been updated to have a more thoughtfully compiled pallette of color combinations. We can now start to develop other color modes if users show an interest in such a feature.

- Update Politeia proposal fetching to reduce amount of data that is consistantly requested. Previously, every load of decrediton would cause an unnecessary amount of data to be requested.

v1.5.0 first release candidate is out!

If you like to live on the edge and want to try out the latest goodies from Decred v1.5-RC1 look no further! 

Be sure to let us know if you find any issues as we gear up towards a final release.

Sure, that was only my opinion, I should've added something like "IMHO" at the end of that sentence

Only the market can decide if people chose the right time. We can only buy the dip, and do dollar-cost-averaging if it dips futher than expected.

Yeah, I know, I was just kidding But some ppl indeed chose the right time to buy more Decred. I hope it hit rock bottom a couple of weeks ago and we're not gonna see those prices again.

Double posted. Delete please.

Then is blockchain governance pointless? That was the question.

Yes, I would like to read it, thanks.


Haha. I was not shilling. Staking is/was cheaper.

 Jake Yocom-Piatt interviewed by Ryan Selkis from Messari Crypto


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMJp8rKLkkM

Hey, @Wind_FURY, looks like our shilling worked and somebody decided to buy lots of cheap Decred for staking

Thanks for this explanation, I already edited my post above to not confuse anybody.

To be honest, I never heard about them, exactly as about this Decred airdrop we have discussed above, so again I have expanded my knowledge about cryptocurrencies  .

Sometimes even FUD brings something positive in the end  .

  They are known people

This is jy-p aka Jake Yocom-Piatt from decred





And this is jyap aka Julian from bittrex

Sorry, but your explanation tells me nothing and you provided no examples or anything else to prove your words.

Additionally, this statement


undermines the credibility of your claim, because it is not the same person.

Gambit, of course, I am sorry for your loss, but to blame them with no proofs is just FUD because so far I haven't seen any evidence that this airdrop was as you claim "FRAUDULENT".

Even more Decred supporters presented evidence that everything was fine, you quoted it yourself, so tell me who would you believe in my place?

LOL now I understood why this troll speaks a lot about decred and bittrex
Just clarifying that jy-p (Jake Yocom Piatt) from Decred and jyap (Julian) from bittrex are not the same person

what i really need to REPOST the screenshot showing the "acceptance" letter? :\ hmmm + i found out i'm not the only one this happened to!!

===>

/\CURRENT ALERTS FOR THIS BUSINESS

Pattern of Complaint:

https://www.bbb.org/us/wa/seattle/profile/virtual-currency/bittrex-inc-1296-1000048938

JULIAN(JYAP) https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jyap-332203 THE BITTREX WALLETS INSIDER SHILLED THE DOGSHIT OUT OF DECRED USING THE JUMBUCKS SLACK BOARD PLATFORM !!! ( VIOLATING SLACK TOS AND SECURITIES LAWS)

I LOST A LOT OF BITCOIN BECAUSE I STOOD UP TO THESE PRICKS!!

>>>FUCK DCR/DECRED PHISHING SCAM VIA BITTREX AND DECRED FRAUDULENT AIRDROP.(NEWS@11)<<<

I will advise reporting all posts which are obvious FUD like this one about the airdrop and moderators will remove it, only add a proper description to let them know what is going on.

I am in the [CLUB] The SpamBusters! Busting rule-breakers for more than a year. for a long time and reported already almost 3000 posts with 100% accuracy.
Many times I have reposted posts which were total bullshit, nonsense, lie or FUD. As I said not only spam gets removed.

And you don't need such posts in this thread because it only brings confusion and put Decred in a bad light, despite is not true.
This is the real power of FUD, no matter if it is true, the only thing that matter is to throw mud and spread false accusations and bad advertising, which obviously is the case here.

Like he said, gembitz is our resident troll. Plz don't over-feed him

Thank you very much for this answer with all the detailed pieces of information about Decred airdrop.

Exactly what I was asking for and of course awarded this post with merit to show my appreciation and how valuable it was for me.

I don't see anything suspicious here, even more, that was really decent airdrop with clear requirements, so really don't understand all these FUD above?

Clam was probably the first relatively large scale successful airdrop, maybe not the first, but way before decred. There was if course the infamous auroracoin airdrop that never happened, afaik, but also 2014ish. Stellar Facebook giveaway shitshow also around then. It wasn't really an original idea by the time decred did it, but it seems like they did a pretty good job vetting people and still achieving relatively widespread distribution.