Topic: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 - page 154. (Read 523666 times)
June 08, 2013, 05:40:52 PM
Are the devs working on any new projects?
June 08, 2013, 05:39:24 PM
Could you confirm these settings...if I use these Iam seeing that with 350kh or so.. I have 40%+ of the pool hash?!
http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8810/static/
http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8810/static/
I'll throw 1.4 Mh/s into the pool for a while.
June 08, 2013, 05:35:26 PM
Good to see your pool back online.
I am very confident in the new software base. It is almost a complete rewrite of mmcFE and is actively being developed.
The database structure is close to half the size of the original, and the code is much cleaner and compact.
I found it out of frustration in trying to follow the original code and figure out where the bug was occurring. PHP is not one of my primary programming languages, although I do understand it and can make modifications, I would not want to write a whole site from scratch.
Anyway, I am determined to make CCM work as I believe it is the best way to fund CCE without resorting to advertising or offering premium services for a fee.
Can't connect on the listed port for stratum, 7070
UPDATE: port blocking issue by ISP. Resolved.
June 08, 2013, 05:27:06 PM
Could you confirm these settings...if I use these Iam seeing that with 350kh or so.. I have 40%+ of the pool hash?!
http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8810/static/
http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8810/static/
Yup, no miners. Posted the code in an effort to get a decentralized P2Pool going for DGC....people just seem to like PushPools though. I don't blame them. Have thought of combining the benefits of PushPools with P2Pools into something new but I'm afraid that would take too much time and effort.
The way I see it when new coins become available P2Pool ops scramble to get something working. They are more concerned with just getting their own pool running and people using it than making it work like it was designed...to connect the pools together to combine hashing power. Unfortunately there is no clear (that I could find) method of finding the proper parameters to use. In order for the pools to connect they have to have the same parameters or bad things happen.
The parameters I used are my best effort to find something that works for BTC but have not really gotten any feedback. I'm not surprised since p2pools can operate fine with different parameters until they try to connect to other p2pools. That's when you start to see if it's functional.
Oh well, I tried. Need to concentrate more on mining instead of this p2pool stuff. Just so you know the LTC P2Pools are at around 800 Mh/s. My node is about 3 Mh/s of that
June 08, 2013, 05:06:52 PM
Good to see your pool back online.
I am very confident in the new software base. It is almost a complete rewrite of mmcFE and is actively being developed.
The database structure is close to half the size of the original, and the code is much cleaner and compact.
I found it out of frustration in trying to follow the original code and figure out where the bug was occurring. PHP is not one of my primary programming languages, although I do understand it and can make modifications, I would not want to write a whole site from scratch.
Anyway, I am determined to make CCM work as I believe it is the best way to fund CCE without resorting to advertising or offering premium services for a fee.
June 08, 2013, 04:32:13 PM
Here is my code for any p2pools that want to connect.
If you have a current p2pool please don't modify that one and change to this code. Instead, start a new p2pool and use a new WORKER_PORT (does not have to be 8810) otherwise you will get a bunch of orphans from your miners since they are submitting work based on different parameters. Not sure how long that will last. Perhaps until the miner reconnects or accepts the new settings. Either way it's not pretty.
All connecting P2Pools must have the same parameters.
p2pool/networks.py
If you have a current p2pool please don't modify that one and change to this code. Instead, start a new p2pool and use a new WORKER_PORT (does not have to be 8810) otherwise you will get a bunch of orphans from your miners since they are submitting work based on different parameters. Not sure how long that will last. Perhaps until the miner reconnects or accepts the new settings. Either way it's not pretty.
All connecting P2Pools must have the same parameters.
p2pool/networks.py
Code:
digitalcoin=math.Object(
PARENT=networks.nets['digitalcoin'],
SHARE_PERIOD=30, # seconds target spacing
CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
SPREAD=90, # blocks
IDENTIFIER='7696CFD6441FB537'.decode('hex'),
PREFIX='4C2530B5ED0E1EB5'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=23396,
MIN_TARGET=0,
MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
PERSIST=False,
WORKER_PORT=8810,
BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='dgc.xpool.net'.split(' '),
ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#digitalcoin',
VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
),
p2pool/bitcoin/networks.pyPARENT=networks.nets['digitalcoin'],
SHARE_PERIOD=30, # seconds target spacing
CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
SPREAD=90, # blocks
IDENTIFIER='7696CFD6441FB537'.decode('hex'),
PREFIX='4C2530B5ED0E1EB5'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=23396,
MIN_TARGET=0,
MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
PERSIST=False,
WORKER_PORT=8810,
BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='dgc.xpool.net'.split(' '),
ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#digitalcoin',
VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
),
Code:
digitalcoin=math.Object(
P2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=7999,
ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
RPC_PORT=7998,
RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
)),
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
SYMBOL='DGC',
CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'digitalcoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/digitalcoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/block/',
ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address/',
SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
),
p2pool/bitcoin/helper.pyP2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=7999,
ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
RPC_PORT=7998,
RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
)),
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
SYMBOL='DGC',
CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'digitalcoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/digitalcoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/block/',
ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address/',
SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
),
Code:
if 'lite' in net.NAME or 'feather' in net.NAME or 'chn' in net.NAME or 'franko' in net.NAME or 'digital' in net.NAME:
Could you confirm these settings...if I use these Iam seeing that with 350kh or so.. I have 40%+ of the pool hash?!
http://gomineit.no-ip.biz:8810/static/
June 08, 2013, 04:13:41 PM
Good to see your pool back online.
June 08, 2013, 03:27:25 PM
The CryptoCoin Mine Digitalcoin pool is now up with the new software base
dgc.cryptocoinmine.com
port 7070 for stratum
port 7339 for LP
You will need to re-register as the database structure is different, and much more efficient, then the old database.
I am offering 0% pool fee till Wednesday 06/12/2013. If response is high enough I may extend it.
I will lower the confirms on the Digitalcoin pool as soon as I have enough reserve built up or bought.
(On that note, I am looking to buy a "bulk" amount of DGC, just shoot me a PM.)
I want to really test out this software base before I make a major change to the payout system. Both pools will remain PPLNS for now, until I am comfortable with changing them over to PPS.
dgc.cryptocoinmine.com
port 7070 for stratum
port 7339 for LP
You will need to re-register as the database structure is different, and much more efficient, then the old database.
I am offering 0% pool fee till Wednesday 06/12/2013. If response is high enough I may extend it.
I will lower the confirms on the Digitalcoin pool as soon as I have enough reserve built up or bought.
(On that note, I am looking to buy a "bulk" amount of DGC, just shoot me a PM.)I want to really test out this software base before I make a major change to the payout system. Both pools will remain PPLNS for now, until I am comfortable with changing them over to PPS.
June 08, 2013, 03:10:18 PM
Fast coin, great rewards, the name has "board appeal" and real buzz potential imo, ... and xpool servers are only 100 miles away I'm on board for as long as the devs are.
My $.02: Over time, the inconvenience of ("1st generation?") slower coins will weigh on their value and usefulness (i.e. LTC). Bitcoin is the exception as it's too public to be replaced anytime soon, and would only shake public confidence of cryptocoins if it was.
Furthermore, I think the average consumer would expect a digital currency to be instant to consider using it over fiat. I know if my mom was waiting for 6 confirmations for BTC, she would think her internet was slow or that she needs a new phone. Something fast like DGC sidesteps all the currency spenders' inevitable, collective frustration while waiting for services.
I'm on board for as long as the devs are.My $.02: Over time, the inconvenience of ("1st generation?") slower coins will weigh on their value and usefulness (i.e. LTC). Bitcoin is the exception as it's too public to be replaced anytime soon, and would only shake public confidence of cryptocoins if it was.
Furthermore, I think the average consumer would expect a digital currency to be instant to consider using it over fiat. I know if my mom was waiting for 6 confirmations for BTC, she would think her internet was slow or that she needs a new phone. Something fast like DGC sidesteps all the currency spenders' inevitable, collective frustration while waiting for services.
June 08, 2013, 02:53:19 PM
June 08, 2013, 02:37:03 PM
There is way too much hashing power on http://digicoinpool.com/
Pool Hashrate: 410.24 MH/s
Network Hashrate: 623.29 Mh/s
Pool Hashrate: 410.24 MH/s
Network Hashrate: 623.29 Mh/s
June 08, 2013, 02:08:01 PM
Here is my code for any p2pools that want to connect.
If you have a current DGC p2pool please don't modify that one and change to this code. Instead, start a new p2pool and use a different WORKER_PORT than your current pool (does not have to be 8810) otherwise you will get a bunch of orphans from your miners since they are submitting work based on different parameters. Not sure how long that will last. Perhaps until the miner reconnects or accepts the new settings. Either way it's not pretty.
All connecting P2Pools must have the same parameters.
p2pool/networks.py
If you have a current DGC p2pool please don't modify that one and change to this code. Instead, start a new p2pool and use a different WORKER_PORT than your current pool (does not have to be 8810) otherwise you will get a bunch of orphans from your miners since they are submitting work based on different parameters. Not sure how long that will last. Perhaps until the miner reconnects or accepts the new settings. Either way it's not pretty.
All connecting P2Pools must have the same parameters.
p2pool/networks.py
Code:
digitalcoin=math.Object(
PARENT=networks.nets['digitalcoin'],
SHARE_PERIOD=30, # seconds target spacing
CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
SPREAD=90, # blocks
IDENTIFIER='7696CFD6441FB537'.decode('hex'),
PREFIX='4C2530B5ED0E1EB5'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=23396,
MIN_TARGET=0,
MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
PERSIST=False,
WORKER_PORT=8810,
BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='dgc.xpool.net'.split(' '),
ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#digitalcoin',
VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
),
p2pool/bitcoin/networks.pyPARENT=networks.nets['digitalcoin'],
SHARE_PERIOD=30, # seconds target spacing
CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity
SPREAD=90, # blocks
IDENTIFIER='7696CFD6441FB537'.decode('hex'),
PREFIX='4C2530B5ED0E1EB5'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=23396,
MIN_TARGET=0,
MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
PERSIST=False,
WORKER_PORT=8810,
BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='dgc.xpool.net'.split(' '),
ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#digitalcoin',
VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
),
Code:
digitalcoin=math.Object(
P2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=7999,
ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
RPC_PORT=7998,
RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
)),
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
SYMBOL='DGC',
CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'digitalcoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/digitalcoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/block/',
ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address/',
SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
),
p2pool/bitcoin/helper.pyP2P_PREFIX='fbc0b6db'.decode('hex'),
P2P_PORT=7999,
ADDRESS_VERSION=30,
RPC_PORT=7998,
RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
'digitalcoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
)),
SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 1*10000000 >> (height + 1)//1080000,
POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
BLOCK_PERIOD=30, # s targetspacing
SYMBOL='DGC',
CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'digitalcoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/digitalcoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.digitalcoin'), 'digitalcoin.conf'),
BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/block/',
ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://dgc.cryptocoinexplorer.com/address/',
SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//100000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
),
Code:
if 'lite' in net.NAME or 'digital' in net.NAME:
June 08, 2013, 01:06:38 PM
We have a new merchant, coingas.com, make sure to check it out. You can buy steam games directly for DGC.
Yes!!!!!
You should add this to the first post to let everyone know
+1
Also in the thread title I guess
June 08, 2013, 01:05:37 PM
Had the same accounting issue and decided to try p2pool (don't like it very much) and the payouts seem fine now.
Have you tried p2pool and check the payout rate?
Have you tried p2pool and check the payout rate?
June 08, 2013, 12:16:40 PM
We have a new merchant, coingas.com, make sure to check it out. You can buy steam games directly for DGC.
Yes!!!!!
You should add this to the first post to let everyone know
June 08, 2013, 12:07:21 PM
We have a new merchant, coingas.com, make sure to check it out. You can buy steam games directly for DGC.
That's an awesome site. Glad to see some vendors accepting DGC. I was expecting a bunch of crap games, tbh, but those are new releases. Excellent.
For the lazy, www.coingas.com
Wow. DGC gaining real world usage already. I am going to spread the word about coingas
June 08, 2013, 12:05:35 PM
Anyone having payout issues with http://digi.cryptcoins.net/ ?? I've been mining for a few days here on it. The site (along with coinwarz.com) says I should be getting around 3000 coins a day, however I am getting a fraction of that (about 1200 coins a day based on the rate over the most recent 12 hours of mining). Getting off this pool until I hear some feedback on why this could be. I know DGC has a higher stales rate, but this is beyond that.
June 08, 2013, 11:58:21 AM
We have a new merchant, coingas.com, make sure to check it out. You can buy steam games directly for DGC.
That's an awesome site. Glad to see some vendors accepting DGC. I was expecting a bunch of crap games, tbh, but those are new releases. Excellent.
For the lazy, www.coingas.com
June 08, 2013, 11:15:03 AM
We have a new merchant, coingas.com, make sure to check it out. You can buy steam games directly for DGC.
June 08, 2013, 09:50:59 AM
What happened to BigVern's digicoinpool...Unable to reach since quite sometime....other ANNs pools are reachable..
It's up now... I think. Jump to: