Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][FIRE] FireCoin BitBlockForging @ 1% APR | 98,750+ Supply | 150K limit - page 9. (Read 37622 times)

hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
WOW this coin still alive! My congrats!

When all of the proof of concepts started (since the beginning of every idea or invention in time), being a lot easier for an Alternative to the mainstream coinbase/s & many don't understand the knowledge that it's just not feasibly possible to carry the entire worlds secured data on one or even two designs. It's always easier to build when one = only one (first idea or prototype), but even the biggest movements in life require a second or many vehicles (by hand, automobile, trains, planes, & or the future of moving mountains with the least amount of resources) to balance the load of it's entirety. There's not a single concept in the world that hasn't split or spread between many designs in the actuality of building the prototype better with each & every improvement or new addition to the original design. Many good things can be built with what has been shown to many over the years in all of this, but whether we decide to accelerate or slow (open & closed source) it is up to the world & not held back by just a few any longer? People have been talking about a better world since the beginning of time, but it's all a balancing act of how fast or slow we build the world & who is deciding what pace we move @.
sr. member
Activity: 483
Merit: 250
WOW this coin still alive! My congrats!
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
  Multifaucet  

//Being a year + since the FIRE faucet was started, with the plan to make & not break what FIRE could really become in years. BitCoin is now almost impossible to utilize FAUCETS (small inputs are no longer a good option with BitCoin BTC), as its become overloaded with tx fees & a block-chain that isn't simple to make the smallest transactions.
sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 506
http://cryptoguru.tk/MarketsInfo/index.php?Currency=FIRE

Looking really good Smiley Excellent work keeping a pulse with Firecoin. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?faucet=FIRE

//2016.03.10 Beta of new Block Explorer site engine

http://cryptoguru.tk/CurrencyInfo/index.php?Currency=FIRE

//Status:    Free
Premium Expired:    Expired
Premium Cost:    0.01 BTC/month
BTC Payments Address    18bFfs7i5PcUnoHT5TpGUAb35WwxCCYHQa

//Premium Upgraded for FIRE

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/18bFfs7i5PcUnoHT5TpGUAb35WwxCCYHQa

//Thanks GrinZ for the update PM, beta of the new block explorer is well worth the premium & keeps the community well informed on all points of data  Cool

P.S. The change of "Legend status" to "Currency status", "not all are currency, but most are Legend & can be utilized for things far beyond currency" Wink
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
//Well that's a sad looking OP, looks like the forum changed the new member image rules & didn't notice. A simple link to the edited post should suit for now, but can start a new ANN if there's still interest in shaping FIRE into something useful?
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
   I don't recall if this was in the OP, but there is http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info for nodes & also a good working faucet. Thought heavy about donating more to it, but didn't want to risk to much FIRE in the faucet & have lost enough giving from time to time over the years (not a reason to stop giving though). Been watching it from time to time, but am only an BBcoder with years of hardware experience & could get another node up if anyone could compile a .deb for Ubuntu or Mint? Yes there is always build from source, but going through O.S. (testing) almost everyday would take to much work & really need simplified installations.
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
I have tried to synchronized my wallet but without success. Is there a good list with working nodes?

Here's what I'm connected to right now.  The seed node in the code has long been offline.  This coin has been working well, it could use a new dev who wants to dedicate some time to it.

[
{
"addr" : "23.80.94.149:49697",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1451355204,
"lastrecv" : 1451355139,
"conntime" : 1450982638,
"version" : 70013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 95203,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "5.9.36.211:43273",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1451355209,
"lastrecv" : 1451355209,
"conntime" : 1450982641,
"version" : 70013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.1/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 95203,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.134.72.213:64909",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1451355209,
"lastrecv" : 1451355209,
"conntime" : 1450982641,
"version" : 70013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 95203,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "188.113.208.0:17628",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1451355180,
"lastrecv" : 1451355201,
"conntime" : 1451349518,
"version" : 70013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 95812,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "174.66.179.66:64984",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1451355209,
"lastrecv" : 1451355209,
"conntime" : 1451355164,
"version" : 70013,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:4.0.0/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 95820,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 100
I have tried to synchronized my wallet but without success. Is there a good list with working nodes?
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
Good to see FIRE network alive and healthy. 
sr. member
Activity: 357
Merit: 250
Is firecoin still going? Let's get some ideals.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
BTC=1GjeqWFLc4TBDg3bwdQk9ZWnEoNPCT9t6G
I'm still with Fire.I have never had a problem with the wallet until recently.Good to hear some news it caught my attention.  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
So what future plans for this coin, dev?

The original developer abandon right after PoW (Original Post Info), a few community members (coders & non-coders, or dev's as most say) tried to build a good community around FIRE & also decided to leave it. If there's no community, there's no development & developers can't do anything about that. FIRE works great (having personally tested over 1000+ wallets, it's resources to run are far less than most), but there's 100's of coins that work & have very small community (or lack of communication). There's also 1000's of them that have been defunct (abandon or broken beyond repair). I know many have spent 100's of hours working on rebuilding FIRE (more than once to help from the abandonment after PoW), really don't get some of these coingen launches & it wouldn't take much to have something working for over a year (last week was 1 year, thought about having a give a way & have spent more time helping in crypto than most do in there full time jobs? I have made less than a penny or cent an hour if you calculate how many hours I've spent trying to help, aside from mining that is). As they say on many other coins, development without some kind of funding is almost a certain failure & the few that have tried to help FIRE didn't have anymore time or money to waste (I have all the time in the world, but having a bad back & no money to help isn't going to get FIRE anywhere). Wish it weren't true, but that's the facts & only a current or new person / group can get FIRE anywhere Undecided

// I could spend 100's of hours updating the ANN, website, github & maybe a few other things. It still wouldn't do any good without others helping out, someday maybe FIRE will get it's chance Undecided
sr. member
Activity: 483
Merit: 250
So what future plans for this coin, dev?
sr. member
Activity: 373
Merit: 506
sr. member
Activity: 483
Merit: 250

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Undecided




Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)

It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade (Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong.


But the problem of attracting users is still open. Is not it? If no one buys the coin, so it is useless and old holders simply have nothing to lose. I think problem in its parameters. With the current parameters, it is not profitable to buy. Here in the forum is very large community of fans of high pos. They will just happy to buy this coin, if you make a few changes to the coin parameters to increase the total to ~5 million FIRE and increase the pos % to ~100% per annum.
Create a poll on this issue, I am sure that the holders will support it.

p.s. I had been receiving BTC dividends from this coin, so I want to see it successful again. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Undecided




Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)

It will never reach 1 mil, 150,000 FIRE is the max & that will take over a decade (Github Link to the Max supply). The specs on FIRE seem to be more for a certain rarity, adding more coins would not only hurt the people that bought in on the launch of FIRE (100k sats). It would would make it almost impossible to help anyone who bought in on the second launch of FIRE, but that's just what I see here & I could be wrong.
sr. member
Activity: 483
Merit: 250

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Undecided




Maybe you guys should increase pos annual % for the attracting high pos lovers? Let's say 50 - 100% per annum.
Even with 100% per annum, this will be a rare coin because will need more than 5 years to reach the mark of 1 million coins. I would love to buy a rare coin with 100% per annum. (I have DMD coins in my porfolio with 50% per annum and rare.)
hero member
Activity: 614
Merit: 506
Applications
Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)



Thanks for the tip! Smiley

It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138.

Which one is correct?



I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers.

So, now I'm Ok and staking. Smiley

For the ones who see & know what rare specs to look for in a coin, here's FIRE's to date:

Total blocks:    60048
Synchronized blocks:    60048 (100.00000000 %)
Total transactions:    120671
Total coins:    97856.62985808 FIRE
POW coins:    97496.02194000 FIRE (99.62713093 %) << PoW Ended 3 days after if I recall right
POS coins:    364.89308736 FIRE (0.37286907 %) <
Total send amount:    1459278.17679470 FIRE
Total receive amount:    1459273.84894470 FIRE
Total fee amount:    4.32785000 FIRE
Total used addresses:    4942
Total funded addresses:    428
Total empty addresses:    4514

// 1 coin or 1 Billion coins all calculate the same if implemented right (see it all the time over the years), but in my own research & seeing people seem to want the big # (with 8 decimals & some more, it's beyond me why more would catch peoples eyes)? There are chains with what a possible supply would demand (say an item or key codes of merchandise as an example), then chains with less & useful for a specific design. That's just what I see with many of these, but no one wants to be transparent & I have seen why many times over the years. Still seeing this could help the world in so many ways, but we have to get past certain learning curves Undecided

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
Haven't connections. Guys need some working nodes please.


EDIT: Now I have connections and my wallet will be online. Thanks!

1) ~ http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=FIRE&network_info

2) ~ http://blockexperts.com/fire   (click the PEERS tab for nodes)



Thanks for the tip! Smiley

It seems blockexperts.com (or me?) is currently not synchronized. Blockexperts shows Current Block 59909, and in my wallet I see 60138.

Which one is correct?



I've done a full resync from scratch. And now I have the same block count with two BlockExplorers.

So, now I'm Ok and staking. Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: