Topic: [ANN][GSX] Glowshares: Community Driven Blockchain Development - page 11. (Read 90471 times)
November 25, 2014, 04:33:48 PM
Very impressive mate i have to say . Price sustained and literally booming .Great effort #GSX
November 25, 2014, 03:52:04 PM
finaly some FUD around
November 25, 2014, 03:50:38 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
Hi,
Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.
We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.
Cheers,
p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words
First step forward in crypto for a long time
Yeah definitely, I wonder why the GSX dev wants to be anonymous?
I strongly recommend staying away from anonymous ICOs.
LOL at the devs burying posts. They are pretty good and on top of it (big long images work the best)
p.s. have you seen the website, I like the green one, i like the blue one, i would like to add GSX is goin up
November 25, 2014, 03:33:40 PM
November 25, 2014, 03:07:16 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
Hi,
Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.
We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.
Cheers,
p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words
First step forward in crypto for a long time
Yeah definitely, I wonder why the GSX dev wants to be anonymous?
November 25, 2014, 02:56:43 PM
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
Twitter Follow for no BS crypto: @SecretsOfCrypto
November 25, 2014, 02:46:27 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
Hi,
Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.
We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.
Cheers,
p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words
First step forward in crypto for a long time
November 25, 2014, 02:23:24 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
Hi,
Yes we do this verification for free. We are helping people DYOR. Users are able to easily and quickly see if a developer is anonymous to the public or not. In this case the GlowShares developer is anonymous.
We can do one for BTC too (however the site is really all about altcoins). I will message you when its ready.
Cheers,
p.s. thanks to everyone that is supporting our growing cause and your kind words
November 25, 2014, 02:17:30 PM
November 25, 2014, 02:16:57 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Are you make this verification for free? Can we see a Bitcoin verification too? Your ID and details of your self too? Im so curious realy...
November 25, 2014, 02:14:41 PM
November 25, 2014, 02:10:28 PM
I just saw that @glowshares posted the images on twitter.
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536774562189701121
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536774244655693825
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536770378253991936
Please tweet the update so that we can all Re-tweet and spread the word
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536774562189701121
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536774244655693825
https://twitter.com/GlowShares/status/536770378253991936
Please tweet the update so that we can all Re-tweet and spread the word
I RETWEETED FOR Gr$$N VOTING IMAGE ON TWITTER
Did you guys vote by retweeting on twitter yet?
November 25, 2014, 02:09:46 PM
thanks for sharing this earlier in the thread too GucciCoign. glad that we've got a dev who isn't afraid and going to run like others
I hope it's clear by now that I'm not going anywhere, but I still stand by this!
November 25, 2014, 02:04:59 PM
November 25, 2014, 02:01:59 PM
ICO price was 0.00033333 and price is currently 0.00092786 was just 0.00100000 sats per coin.
0.00092786 / 0.00033333 = 2.7836 times the original ICO price.
The math isn't that difficult bro.
0.00092786 / 0.00033333 = 2.7836 times the original ICO price.
The math isn't that difficult bro.
What are you talking about, the price didn't double. It only moved up about 35%.
November 25, 2014, 01:59:01 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Been seeing you guys around lately. I love your site. Following
Finally an organization that isn't trying to hide things from us. Going to be watching you guys. Thanks for your service to the community
+100000000000000000000000. Support this 100%. Alt.Report is best.
Paying cryptoasian to keep your identity private is garbage.
November 25, 2014, 01:56:34 PM
thanks for sharing this earlier in the thread too GucciCoign. glad that we've got a dev who isn't afraid and going to run like others
November 25, 2014, 01:53:45 PM
So why should I buy this coin?
It doesn't seem to have any uses.
It doesn't seem to have any uses.
I will explain it to you after the price doubles again.
What are you talking about, the price didn't double. It only moved up about 35%.
I am reading through all this, and I see nothing I can do with this coin.
Not even seeing a crappy gambling site.
The only thing that I'm seeing that is slightly different is a voting system.
Which is becoming common in new coins.
I'm honestly asking, what is so interesting/valuable about this coin?
many coins went down ( especially cons right after there ipo was released ) this coin went up and stay,s stable up ( meaning dev did not dump his self bought coins )
so every one see,s this coin make profit and is hopping in also ( making the price go up more )
especialy sins this was a ipo that was not dumped to shit by a dev buying his own coins 
Really happy I bought during the ICO at .00033333, especially considering it was even up to 100,000 sats this morning! This is the first ICO in a long time, if EVER that hasn't dropped below ICO price in the first 24hours and STILL has not! This one will be going far
November 25, 2014, 01:50:52 PM
Can you get that crap out of here and keep the thread on topic?
November 25, 2014, 01:21:09 PM
Hello everyone,
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
We believe developers can only be verified by public knowledge. Other services will accept payment to keep the developers identities private, yet claim to have verified the developer as a real person. This logic doesn't make sense to us because, for the public, there is no way to know who the developer is (and therefore no idea who you are investing in). In this sense, developer verification is useless to the public because you are meant to trust that 1 person has verified this. In the past, scam artists have gotten around this by tricking this 1 person with a fake ID. Once it is reported that they have been scammed by a fake ID it's too late. Investors have lost money and on top of that, the scam developers have paid to keep their information private anyway. So who side is the POD on? Typically these other services will remove the verification from their website like it never happened. We will not take part in this type of verification. We would like the community to verify our developers.
Our verification is based on 1 simple fact: whether they are anonymous or not. In no way are we grading the quality of a coin (different section for that). We are simply providing anonymity information. There is no scale on how verified a developer is. They are either open to the public (pass) or they want to hide their identities (fail). You are either one or the other, you can't be "in-between".
That being said, Developer Verification for GlowShares [GSX] is up on our site. Please let us know what you guys think:
http://alt.report/developer-verification
Cheers
Been seeing you guys around lately. I love your site. Following
Finally an organization that isn't trying to hide things from us. Going to be watching you guys. Thanks for your service to the community
Jump to: