Hi. When the cards will be released? The token price start to go up last 2 days but we are waiting for high volume exchanges like Bittrex or Binance.
This will take CAG to the moon.
I don't like using expressions like "to the moon" but one thing is sure: the current price of CAG is just ridiculously low. Bancor is at 5$ with the same volume of coins. We'll see what the future brings!
While I personally don't like the comparison of the Bancor price (because Bancor is a protocol) I do agree that the price of this is ridiculously low.
I just hearken back to the table here:
https://medium.com/@CryptoJudgemnt/comparing-cryptobanks-tenx-monaco-change-polybius-tokencard-bankera-54345c04c6a7 (even though I see mention of fees in the article posted a few posts above this up)...If you look at that table and consider that we're pretty much moving out of the testing phase, all we have to do is work on growing the ecosystem. WE JUST passed Polybius and Tokencard in cap rankings in the past month but prior to that Change was the lowest on the totem pole even though we project to be one of the best.
NONE of Change's competitors can boast E-residency and this can bring huge potential to the third party services platform. Also as far as I'm aware, Change bank gives the most total percentage points back to its hodlers versus the competition. We're def well positioned for great long term growth and a big exchange listing like Binance could come at any given moment.
Be careful with claims the make for themselves, as you know hundreds of people got scammed with the bounty program, including myself. I even got banned from their telegram for defending someone who also hadn't received his proper share. Teams often promise you wonderful things but in reality all they care about is getting as much backers as possible, in any way they can. I guarantee sooner or later there will be more disappointing news. Btw to clarify, I don't hold any CAG anymore because I sold it to buy better coins (sonm, strat, ...) and I suggest you do the same, because if you can't trust the team, you're not investing, instead you're gambling.
I've heard rumblings of disappointment with the bounty program and I'll dig deeper into the bounty program. No disrespect, but I see people complaining about getting slighted fairly often in bounties and while I sympathize with those if it's due, I'm personally not at a point where I care to play judge and jury with any bounty program. I'm PRETTY SURE there were people complaining about getting slighted in the SONM thread waaay back when about their bounty program, so there's that.
Do you know how many coins I would be into if I listened only to all the bad I hear about coins? Even the big coins like Stellar and Ripple have controversial backstories, Check Qtum and Bitbay. I'm not condoning it and I'm not trying derail this thread, but if it's not one thing it's something else.
That said I'm not going anywhere on this coin. The whole crypto world is speculative, you taking risks no matter how you chop it up. I'm not an all in investor; I have spread my risk out significantly. I didn't come into crypto with my last or my life savings, I came in to crypto knowing full and well I could lose whatever I brought to the game. I have a venture capitalist approach and I already conceded that somethings will lose. I've accepted the risks and I live with it. If you check my post history you won't ever see me whining or complaining about any crypto, and if I ever said something negative about a crypto when it was down it was jokingly (and I'm sure I owned it).
I fully understand, and I agree with what you're saying, but the difference between teams like Sonm and teams like Change is that only one of them welcomes criticism and questions. Every single member of the Change team has been ignoring me ever since I sent them emails/telegrams/... containing more than enough proof of how I barely got 1/5th of what I deserved. That to me is a big red flag.
If you check my post history, you won't find any whining in there, but we are all investors, which means we deserve to have a voice, even if our words aren't always positive. One last thing, if the change team had addressed my claims and explained to me why my calculations are wrong or why they can't pay me (and hundreds of others) the full rewards, I'd be 100% OK with it. The fact that they don't explain themselves, AND that they've been banning people left and right from their communication channels shows they're not as respectful, professional and reasonable as they want people to think.