Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] MARK.SPACE - 3D/VR ecosystem on blockchain - page 299. (Read 162087 times)

full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
wow the discussion was so lively
what a lot of people appeared for a short time
I think that this is generally a good indicator for the project
Is this can be bad ahah?
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Earn with impressio.io
wow the discussion was so lively
what a lot of people appeared for a short time
I think that this is generally a good indicator for the project
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
wow the discussion was so lively
what a lot of people appeared for a short time
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 250
Earn with impressio.io
wow the discussion was so lively
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250

You really have an opinion or are you a robot?
ahaha no I'm not a robot Grin
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much


I think that road map is very detailed

Why?

Because it has a lot of useful information in it, that is really relevant to the project

In general, people think road maps are more for general mile stones, not too many details

I still think it is too detailed..


I do note a road map for this project as one of the best and most compact of all seen
I know it depends according to what criteria to consider
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
It's all about the cryptocoins
I had the same idea about 2020.. but .. years fly by so fast.. so 2020 could be there very quick.
But I agree, they should shift a gear up to get this sooner... I don't know if such a long term roadmap is motivating and appealing for investors.
Offcourse it's normal that development can take a while to be 99% perfect...
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much


I think that road map is very detailed

Why?

Because it has a lot of useful information in it, that is really relevant to the project

In general, people think road maps are more for general mile stones, not too many details

I still think it is too detailed..


I do note a road map for this project as one of the best and most compact of all seen
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 253
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much
as you can see the work in 2015 and each year something new is it bad?
it seems to me that 5 years on the job is even too much
the work is of sufficient magnitude so long
in my opinion too long anyway
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Become Part of the Mining Family
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much


I think that road map is very detailed

Why?

Because it has a lot of useful information in it, that is really relevant to the project

In general, people think road maps are more for general mile stones, not too many details

I still think it is too detailed..

sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much
as you can see the work in 2015 and each year something new is it bad?
it seems to me that 5 years on the job is even too much
the work is of sufficient magnitude so long
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 253
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much
as you can see the work in 2015 and each year something new is it bad?
it seems to me that 5 years on the job is even too much
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much
as you can see the work in 2015 and each year something new is it bad?
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 253
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
I still think 2020 is too much
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
because by 2020 a very long time
In general, the work is painted for each year
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 253
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
I think that road map is too stretched
why?
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 253
I think that road map is too stretched
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 100
I like the project. Tell me, what will happen to the unsold tokens? Will they be burned?

Hi! Unsold tokens will be transferred to second stage of ICO (2019).


What purpose does the second stage of ICO will serve? Is it really necessary?

And why would it be pushed to 2019? I've seen ICOs extend their ICO if they don't sell out, but never over a year later.

I think they plan to held the 2nd ICO in 2019 to coincide with a lot of major developments in MARK.SPACE project and that could make the token very attractive to investors. Smiley
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
What about the project roadmap? Where can I find the whitepaper? Regarding the exchanges will be listed when?

Roadmap: https://mark.space/#Roadmap
white paper: https://mark.space/files/wp/WP_en.pdf

check out their site. has lots of information.
All the information has been made available by the team in its official and unofficial platforms, on the issue of exchanges, I think it will be listed initially in smaller exchanges, despite the success achieved, but I do not see this as a problem with the potential of the project, will have a wonderful extension, and consequently the adhesion of larger and larger volumes
Jump to: