Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][ITO] Scienceroot - The first Blockchain-based Scientific Ecosystem - page 3. (Read 6788 times)

newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
soft cap and hard cap how effects our work and so on how they relate to profit and loss?
newbie
Activity: 120
Merit: 0
Shouldn't you make an interest return policy for the investors?
newbie
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
How many articles do you plan to publish every year on the platform?

It depends heavily on the popularity, I guess.
sr. member
Activity: 349
Merit: 250
“Blockchain Just Entered The Real World”
So what if it requires time to get the trust? Starting small is better than no start at all.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
The well-known magazines charge for publishing the articles for a reason - they have a reputation and people know that the articles there are trust-worth. You will need time to achieve the same trust level.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
Do you collaborate with other scientific funds or companies?

Yes we already discussed the implementation of blockchain into the scientific community with granting agencies and institutions.

What's the benefit for the funds?
I see that the scientists will prefer to optimize the work using the platform. But the funds?

The funds will have another channel to market their funds, because currently many of the funding options go under the radar.
We want to connect funding agencies with scientists looking for grants.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
Usually the scientific projects need to have any commercial implementation to be funded. Is it so on the ScienceRoot?

Not necessarily we will also promote non-commercial grants.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
Who will do the projects' evaluation for the grants?

Experienced personnel from that particular field.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
I think there must be at least a few big funds to partner with the platform in the beginning.

Yes there are and we are already in discussion with some of them but our current development focus lies on the collaboration platform and afterwards we move toward the funding platform.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
Should you advertise in the scientific forums as well?

We advertise to the scientific direct through our network of researchers and academics and we also attend different conferences where we promote our product.
copper member
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Scienceroot.com
Where are you based?!

The company is incorporated in Romania, but the team members live in Austria, Romania and Germany.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
How about partnership with non-commercial funds?
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
Do you collaborate with other scientific funds or companies?

Yes we already discussed the implementation of blockchain into the scientific community with granting agencies and institutions.

What's the benefit for the funds?
I see that the scientists will prefer to optimize the work using the platform. But the funds?
newbie
Activity: 122
Merit: 0
If only the commercial projects get funds, the science won't develop in the long run…
member
Activity: 218
Merit: 10
Usually the scientific projects need to have any commercial implementation to be funded. Is it so on the ScienceRoot?
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
What can the investors expect in return for funding the projects?
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
the effort to put something like this on going is pretty cool but i;m not sure of it's potential  Undecided

The scientific system is hurting, during our conferences and discussions with the scientific community we received a lot of support to develop such a platform.


So this idea is like in the air? In this case the community will jump in to start using the new opportunities.
member
Activity: 166
Merit: 10
Good luck to the project! The community is waiting for the launch Wink
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
What is the purpose of publishing the article on the platform?
newbie
Activity: 141
Merit: 0
Why do you need to reward the reviewers? And how can you guarantee a fair work from them?

Review takes up to 6 hours and is currently done for free by fellow scientists, we believe that everyone's time is valuable and needs to be rewarded.
That is why we aim to use a part of the article processing charge to reward reviewers.

You're right. The time and labour got to be valued and payed.
Pages:
Jump to: