that cg miner is not working for maxcoin..
Another strike against already proven incompetent devs. Where did Max find theses clueless wonders?
Topic: [ANN][MAX] MAXcoin - PoW, ASIC Resistance, Keccak GPU Mining - page 439. (Read 914323 times)
February 06, 2014, 08:06:47 AM
Another strike against already proven incompetent devs. Where did Max find theses clueless wonders?
February 06, 2014, 08:06:32 AM
Maybe not a popular opinion, but shouldn't we contact developers to ask for delay before CGminer for keccak would be released? Cause if they talk about fairness, Nvidia guys already have advantage on both cpu and ati users. And I don't see how less fair start could be than it is now.
February 06, 2014, 08:06:00 AM
Anyone know if this is really going up on: https://mcxnow.com/ - as of now, nothing up on site but a lot of people saying they read on chat..
I just asked RealSolid:http://img.ctrlv.in/img/52f369efe2015.jpg
So yes, it's going to be added on McxNow
Cheers- any idea why he hasnt gone public with this? Talk of tweets, but as of now havent seen anything.
February 06, 2014, 08:05:16 AM
just a point of note,
they said in their statement 13 hours ago that wallets would be available from morning time to allow everyone download.
its now 13.05 and no sign of the password protected wallets...hmmm another fubber i think
they said in their statement 13 hours ago that wallets would be available from morning time to allow everyone download.
its now 13.05 and no sign of the password protected wallets...hmmm another fubber i think
February 06, 2014, 08:01:14 AM
that cg miner is not working for maxcoin..
February 06, 2014, 08:00:08 AM
i have read that someone got the cuda miner to work for the new algro, but this is not set in stone, just becacuse a benchmark works does not mean it will work with the maxcoin wallet.
February 06, 2014, 07:59:59 AM
I think if you want good volume initially it will be coins-e simply because the devs have been pushing it and they have had 1000's of registrations in anticipation of maxcoin.
February 06, 2014, 07:59:53 AM
This is on an 8 core XL Azure free trial:
Code:
./minerd --algo=keccak --benchmark
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] 8 miner threads started, using 'keccak' algorithm.
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 2: 2097152 hashes, 782.90 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 6: 2097152 hashes, 782.78 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 0: 2097152 hashes, 781.91 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 3: 2097152 hashes, 781.76 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 5: 2097152 hashes, 781.38 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 7: 2097152 hashes, 778.56 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 1: 2097152 hashes, 778.28 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 4: 2097152 hashes, 775.25 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:31] thread 7: 3892811 hashes, 783.44 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:31] Total: 6248 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] 8 miner threads started, using 'keccak' algorithm.
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-02-06 04:57:23] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 2: 2097152 hashes, 782.90 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 6: 2097152 hashes, 782.78 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 0: 2097152 hashes, 781.91 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 3: 2097152 hashes, 781.76 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 5: 2097152 hashes, 781.38 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 7: 2097152 hashes, 778.56 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 1: 2097152 hashes, 778.28 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:26] thread 4: 2097152 hashes, 775.25 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:31] thread 7: 3892811 hashes, 783.44 khash/s
[2014-02-06 04:57:31] Total: 6248 khash/s
I am rather new to this mining stuff. I think I'm doing the same as you are doing with the same XL system with CentOS, but three issues come up:
1. I don't see any of the "Binding thread..." lines
2. My individual thread hash is ~912 khash/s
I don't know why this is the case.
February 06, 2014, 07:57:46 AM
wow this coin has gone from hero to zero real quick in my books.
failed lauunch and know a select few get to gpu mine while the rest stuck with cpu
are the devs getting worse or is it just me. are they just out to try make a quick buck and do not care about the future of crypto all that much . i dont know maybe its just me.
failed lauunch and know a select few get to gpu mine while the rest stuck with cpu
are the devs getting worse or is it just me. are they just out to try make a quick buck and do not care about the future of crypto all that much . i dont know maybe its just me.
Select few can GPU mine? Where and who? Please link.
February 06, 2014, 07:57:22 AM
Guys.. but this ?
https://github.com/Eropi4/cgminer_keccak/releases
https://github.com/Eropi4/cgminer_keccak/releases
February 06, 2014, 07:55:30 AM
MCX will be it.. RealSolid tweeted about it..
do you have a link to that tweet?I
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4971094
https://twitter.com/TheRealSolid/status/431236623049580544
he's advertising his exchange, i can't see a real announcement
It's quite obvious, but he didn't announce it explicitly on Twitter. He did it on the mcx chat.
He's talking about that right now.
February 06, 2014, 07:54:34 AM
Maybe not a popular opinion, but shouldn't we contact developers to ask for delay before CGminer for keccak would be released? Cause if they talk about fairness, Nvidia guys already have advantage on both cpu and ati users. And I don't see how less fair start could be than it is now.
February 06, 2014, 07:52:21 AM
MCX will be it.. RealSolid tweeted about it..
do you have a link to that tweet?I
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4971094
https://twitter.com/TheRealSolid/status/431236623049580544
he's advertising his exchange, i can't see a real announcement
February 06, 2014, 07:50:48 AM
MCX will be it.. RealSolid tweeted about it..
do you have a link to that tweet?I
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4971094
https://twitter.com/TheRealSolid/status/431236623049580544
February 06, 2014, 07:50:08 AM
MCX will be it.. RealSolid tweeted about it..
do you have a link to that tweet?
February 06, 2014, 07:49:50 AM
So whats the consensus, which exchange are we going to use coins e or MCX? volume will be an issue so its better to figure this out
mcxNOW will be able to handle the load. I don't think coins-e would.
February 06, 2014, 07:47:18 AM
MCX will be it.. RealSolid tweeted about it..
February 06, 2014, 07:43:24 AM
I think mcxnow.com is definitely the better choice, it's very fast and you get interest on deposits. The question is how soon will rs implement it? Keep posting on chat to make him implement it quickly
February 06, 2014, 07:42:02 AM
worry about exchange next week when the coin gets released lol
February 06, 2014, 07:40:37 AM
So whats the consensus, which exchange are we going to use coins e or MCX? volume will be an issue so its better to figure this out
Jump to: