"NEX’s mission is to empower more than one billion users to invest, trade and manage digital assets by 2030. We aim to be the premier platform for decentralized financial tools and services." - that's definitely good position. But I will ask again the already painful question which interests many people here and beyond, how is it going with the legal point of view? and when will you start holding your token sale event? Thank you!
I will post these questions and answers from Canesin (CEO) also here. The communication was on subreddit of NEO:
Q:
What's really going on behind the scenes of Neonexchange?
I know it takes time but a 3 to 4 months miscalculation seems immense. Once their ico goes live the exchange should be ready to go no?
Fabio:
The exchange doesn't need the ICO to be launched, but we are certain the sale will happen before. Our plans and road map have always been for opening the exchange for the public at the end of Q3, we are working hard to achieve that deadline. Behind the scenes we are developing what we said we would deliver, we are not a all hype and no product project - that is why we are more silent than usual ICOs, we are growing (currently 18 employees, we want to triple) and we understand the expectation of our community.
Q:
What are the chances to get regulatory approval within the next couple of weeks?
Fabio:
I can't reply that, but I can explain the process. When we made our consultantion we put forward all the planning of products and developments planned and what licenses each would need, in some jurisdictions. It is not a simple "can I do this ICO ?", so we already have green light on several of those items and revised some others. For the public offer what we are waiting is the return of the documentation and an acknowledgement that the process is over, so we have a solid set of legal backing that we can raise general capital with.
Q:
Maybe regulation was a bit underestimated then? If u get approval how else will regulation slow down growth... It is just one of many hurdles I assume.
Fabio:
Some jurisdictions are faster than others to go through the process, where going 100% in-house will be unpractical we will look at other alternatives to allow us to operate.
Maybe you can find you questions here (partially at least).