Sometimes the database is switching the neg/neu counts, and I am not sure why. 
It sounds like you made a typo somewhere. 
Topic: Announcing BPIP - The Bitcointalk Public Information Project! - page 5. (Read 33658 times)
Hey Vod,
Just noticed something might be wrong with the Trust module.
According to BPIP my trust is +8 / = 0 / - 1 while it is +8 / = 1 / - 0 as far as I can tell.
(not sure if the the = 1 gets counted since it was left by one of these who also left a positive feedback).
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche
Edit: Maybe this is related to the DT2 thing you are working on?
Just noticed something might be wrong with the Trust module.
According to BPIP my trust is +8 / = 0 / - 1 while it is +8 / = 1 / - 0 as far as I can tell.
(not sure if the the = 1 gets counted since it was left by one of these who also left a positive feedback).
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche
Edit: Maybe this is related to the DT2 thing you are working on?
This is a diff bug. Sometimes the database is switching the neg/neu counts, and I am not sure why.
Hey Vod,
Just noticed something might be wrong with the Trust module.
According to BPIP my trust is +8 / = 0 / - 1 while it is +8 / = 1 / - 0 as far as I can tell.
(not sure if the the = 1 gets counted since it was left by one of these who also left a positive feedback).
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche
Edit: Maybe this is related to the DT2 thing you are working on?
Just noticed something might be wrong with the Trust module.
According to BPIP my trust is +8 / = 0 / - 1 while it is +8 / = 1 / - 0 as far as I can tell.
(not sure if the the = 1 gets counted since it was left by one of these who also left a positive feedback).
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=asche
Edit: Maybe this is related to the DT2 thing you are working on?
I found a bug in recent URLs. Example: on https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=LoyceV&to=theymos, this is the oldest link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28856522 (correct)
And this is the latest link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51801526 (incorrect)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28856522 (correct)
And this is the latest link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51801526 (incorrect)
What gives?
I'm right, BPIP's wrong 
See for instance this link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986671;dt, it shows you're not on DT2.
That was going to be my next question. That link demonstrates I'm not on DT2.
DT2 is being worked on... 
Thanks, am still wondering how I made it to 36th spot on the most recognised in June and am hovering around 39th/40th at the moment.
Almost OT...
I estimate I'll be top 100 for the most active by the end of 2021 and sub 400 for most posts around the end of this year/into start of next year {1}. The other two values are too vague to forecast.
{1} Assumption based solely on those who are not active remaining not active.
What gives?
I'm right, BPIP's wrong See for instance this link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986671;dt, it shows you're not on DT2.
DT2 is being worked on...
What gives?
I'm right, BPIP's wrong See for instance this link:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=986671;dt, it shows you're not on DT2.
Help me out here somebody...
According to the Most Recognised list I'm currently in 40th position and am DT2
However over yonder on @LoyceV's DT1/2 list I'm nowhere to be seen...
What gives?
According to the Most Recognised list I'm currently in 40th position and am DT2
However over yonder on @LoyceV's DT1/2 list I'm nowhere to be seen...
An update with the latest Trust scores and this morning's Trust data dump:
DT 1
(Meh (as Alaki would say))
DT 2
(Meh)
DT 1
(Meh (as Alaki would say))
DT 2
(Meh)
What gives?
iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon. I'm not ignoring you.
No rush, I know it's easier/faster to make requests than actually implement them 
Why did this peter griffin guy put so much effort into this instead of building a real business? It look good and all but dont think the effort is worth it.
It's a joint effort, and well worth it! ...
Why did this peter griffin guy put so much effort into this instead of building a real business? It look good and all but dont think the effort is worth it.
Greetings early birds.
BPIP sounds allmost like PIP but it has that tint of renewal. Great idea!
As i told the birds. First i got pip and then kuk and now you come with BPIP. Make it loud!
BPIP sounds allmost like PIP but it has that tint of renewal. Great idea!
As i told the birds. First i got pip and then kuk and now you come with BPIP. Make it loud!
For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either. Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed. Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page. https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity
Thanks for letting me know. Turns out I was pulling from a wrong table. :/
Thanks. no problem.
Activity ranking seems to be working now, and I see that the activity ranking list is synchronized more accurately with the rest of the activity level data.
For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either. Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed. Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page. https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity
Thanks for letting me know. Turns out I was pulling from a wrong table. :/
For a couple of months, I had noticed that on the BPIP site my actually activity level has shown that it has upgraded from 1932 to 1946 to 1960 to 1974 (current); however, when I click on activity rank, it shows my activity level to still be at 1932, and it looks like other members have not updated on that activity rank page, either. Therefore the activity rank level appears to be showing wrong numbers for at least 4 activity upgrade cycles for most if not all of the members listed. Mine, with a therein listed rating of 1932, is currently shown ranked as 179 on the activity rank page. https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostactivity
Moving the servers into a production domain, preparing for guaranteed service contracts. Site will be down without warning.
iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon. I'm not ignoring you.
iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon. I'm not ignoring you.
Lol, np. Didn't think you were.
Moving the servers into a production domain, preparing for guaranteed service contracts. Site will be down without warning.
iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon. I'm not ignoring you.
iasenko, Initscri, LoyceV - I'll be updating this post with fixes/changes soon. I'm not ignoring you.
BPIP.org is showing that profiles 'Nando1970', 'Rubyjona' and 'GPT COIN' woke up at July 20, 2019.
But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?
-snip-
But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?
-snip-
As you can see in the seclog link, the newbies are hidden (Somehow, Nando1970 is still showing even tho he's a newbie), you can see the two other members here: https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php?all
BPIP.org is showing that profiles 'Nando1970', 'Rubyjona' and 'GPT COIN' woke up at July 20, 2019.
But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?
[BPIP] Nando1970
[BPIP] Rubyjona
[BPIP] GPT COIN
But forum Security Log has information only about account 'Nando1970' for this period. What is the reason?
[BPIP] Nando1970
Code:
8/31/2018 11:51:44 PM password changed
7/20/2019 05:38:35 PM woke up
7/20/2019 05:38:35 PM woke up
[BPIP] Rubyjona
Code:
8/25/2018 04:52:46 PM password changed
7/20/2019 05:36:48 PM woke up
7/20/2019 05:36:48 PM woke up
[BPIP] GPT COIN
Code:
8/26/2018 12:56:02 AM password changed
7/20/2019 05:44:51 PM woke up
7/20/2019 05:44:51 PM woke up
Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php
<...>
- July 20, 2019, 06:17:28 PM - ValeryO - woke up
- July 20, 2019, 05:38:35 PM - Nando1970 - woke up
- July 20, 2019, 05:37:48 PM - etherare - woke up
- July 20, 2019, 05:17:18 PM - mugt - password reset via email
Around 10 days ago I warned about the difference in the the received merit and total merit score values. It's still off by one.
Jump to: