Well the dashboard after 12am nyc time reads 0.01777035 for my balance, 0 for everything else..
Also I noticed for 15mins we got unlucky and a block wasn't found for leaf. I guess due to the lack of mining doge its affecting my profitability (substantially?).
I didn't get a payment today,no doubt due to my 0.0361 threshold not being hit after 2 days of continous mining (disappointing middlecoin performance can't be matched).
Topic: [ANN][Pool][Profit-Switch][Optional Auto-Exchange per Coin][Vardiff] ~ Hashcows - page 36. (Read 347335 times)
February 01, 2014, 11:21:27 PM
February 01, 2014, 11:03:30 PM
I have my miner split 50/50 between Hashcows and Middlecoin and after 5 days Hashcows has actually been outperforming Middlecoin. In fact Hashcows has paid out 29% more than Middlecoin. Of course, YMMV. It seems like when one pool does good the other does poorly. IMHO splitting between the pools evens things out and makes earnings more stable than just mining at one or the other pool. As far as I know, the only balance you can currently trust at Hashcows is the final payout at 10 PM Central Time.
My hashcows balance says: Confirmed exchanged 0.00177260 and balance 0.00984785.
With middlecoin i make 0.012 btc a day. Hashcows needs to get to at least 0.0361 by this time tomorrow to beat middlecoin. Tho I won't hold my breath.
Rejects for hashcows is approx 3.6%.
Based of these projections of hashcows not really challenging middlecoin, I might leave hashcows as my tertiary pool with multipool my secondary (and 1st failover).
Using multipool as a backup, I'd have to see tho if it challenges hashcows. So will no doubt mine at multipool primary for a few days to see if it beats the benchmark of 0.012 btc/day.
Estimates aren't really working properly
Best way to judge is payouts which will be slightly delayed tonight expect it at 12:00 or sooner
February 01, 2014, 10:52:18 PM
I have my miner split 50/50 between Hashcows and Middlecoin and after 5 days Hashcows has actually been outperforming Middlecoin. In fact Hashcows has paid out 29% more than Middlecoin. Of course, YMMV. It seems like when one pool does good the other does poorly. IMHO splitting between the pools evens things out and makes earnings more stable than just mining at one or the other pool. As far as I know, the only balance you can currently trust at Hashcows is the final payout at 10 PM Central Time.
My hashcows balance says: Confirmed exchanged 0.00177260 and balance 0.00984785.
With middlecoin i make 0.012 btc a day. Hashcows needs to get to at least 0.0361 by this time tomorrow to beat middlecoin. Tho I won't hold my breath.
Rejects for hashcows is approx 3.6%.
Since dogehouse has more hash than multipool with multipool spending the majority of its time mining doge, I might trial there. Dogehouse needs to beat the 0.012 btc/day (7000 DOGE approx) that I do on middlecoin which has set the benchmark.
February 01, 2014, 10:37:20 PM
Moo!
February 01, 2014, 10:29:06 PM
February 01, 2014, 10:18:06 PM
Anyone know what the "MOO" coin is?
I can't find it on Cryptocointalk or Google searching of this forum (even after excluding the very similarly named coin with an "n" on the end).
It's fitting anyway for the name of the pool
Code:
7023 MOO 24 minutes 22 9240.22700000 16 6720.07500000 553,565 164,692
I can't find it on Cryptocointalk or Google searching of this forum (even after excluding the very similarly named coin with an "n" on the end).
It's fitting anyway for the name of the pool
My guess is Mooncoin and one of devs is being a joker
February 01, 2014, 09:54:55 PM
Anyone know what the "MOO" coin is?
I can't find it on Cryptocointalk or Google searching of this forum (even after excluding the very similarly named coin with an "n" on the end).
It's fitting anyway for the name of the pool
Code:
7023 MOO 24 minutes 22 9240.22700000 16 6720.07500000 553,565 164,692
I can't find it on Cryptocointalk or Google searching of this forum (even after excluding the very similarly named coin with an "n" on the end).
It's fitting anyway for the name of the pool
February 01, 2014, 08:37:06 PM
Hi all
I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
a full hour??? so long??I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
come on dude!, if you want to test a site, you need AT LEAST 24 Hours of testing, then WAIT another 24 hours for the full payment, and even that is not enough to test it, I will say, at least a week with at least 2 GPUs, 24hs for a accurate testing.
remember that this are all alt coins, so payments are not stable, very hard to predict, but in general, you get a lot more than just mining LTC.
February 01, 2014, 07:00:34 PM
Hi all
I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
Transaction fee for BTC withdrawals is 0.0001. It seems your balance is too low to withdraw.
February 01, 2014, 06:23:51 PM
hello! what does the "Profitability" value on your website means?
February 01, 2014, 06:10:29 AM
Hi all
I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
I make a test
I mined for 1 hour anche get 0.000065 BTC
Now i proceded to cashed out but i waiting from 1 hour, 43 minutes
Why is so slow to pay me?
TIA
February 01, 2014, 04:44:47 AM
Hi
I am a total noob so please forgive my noob question. I bought a minecube today (www.minecube.co.uk) I set it up on a dogecoin pool that my friend recommended and it has been hashing away happily @ 2190KH/s. I was also recommended Hash Cows and gave it a test run. My stats showed my worker hashing @ 365KH/s and after a few minutes my miner stopped working and I had to restart it. It is now back up and running @ 2190KH/s but stats on Hash Cows is showing my worker running @ 1503.0 Kh/s. Did I set my config file up incorrectly or is there any other reason for this? Any help or advise would be much appreciated.
I am a total noob so please forgive my noob question. I bought a minecube today (www.minecube.co.uk) I set it up on a dogecoin pool that my friend recommended and it has been hashing away happily @ 2190KH/s. I was also recommended Hash Cows and gave it a test run. My stats showed my worker hashing @ 365KH/s and after a few minutes my miner stopped working and I had to restart it. It is now back up and running @ 2190KH/s but stats on Hash Cows is showing my worker running @ 1503.0 Kh/s. Did I set my config file up incorrectly or is there any other reason for this? Any help or advise would be much appreciated.
Websites and their Kh/s indicator are rarely accurate. Idk what miner software you'r using (cgminer?) but whatever it shows is accurate. Also FYI hashcows needs 2-3 days to show accurate results because the coins it switches can sometimes take a longer timespam because it doesn't want to flood the market at once (lowers the price).
January 31, 2014, 09:07:07 PM
Hi
I am a total noob so please forgive my noob question. I bought a minecube today (www.minecube.co.uk) I set it up on a dogecoin pool that my friend recommended and it has been hashing away happily @ 2190KH/s. I was also recommended Hash Cows and gave it a test run. My stats showed my worker hashing @ 365KH/s and after a few minutes my miner stopped working and I had to restart it. It is now back up and running @ 2190KH/s but stats on Hash Cows is showing my worker running @ 1503.0 Kh/s. Did I set my config file up incorrectly or is there any other reason for this? Any help or advise would be much appreciated.
I am a total noob so please forgive my noob question. I bought a minecube today (www.minecube.co.uk) I set it up on a dogecoin pool that my friend recommended and it has been hashing away happily @ 2190KH/s. I was also recommended Hash Cows and gave it a test run. My stats showed my worker hashing @ 365KH/s and after a few minutes my miner stopped working and I had to restart it. It is now back up and running @ 2190KH/s but stats on Hash Cows is showing my worker running @ 1503.0 Kh/s. Did I set my config file up incorrectly or is there any other reason for this? Any help or advise would be much appreciated.
January 31, 2014, 04:05:40 PM
I have my miner split 50/50 between Hashcows and Middlecoin and after 5 days Hashcows has actually been outperforming Middlecoin. In fact Hashcows has paid out 29% more than Middlecoin. Of course, YMMV. It seems like when one pool does good the other does poorly. IMHO splitting between the pools evens things out and makes earnings more stable than just mining at one or the other pool. As far as I know, the only balance you can currently trust at Hashcows is the final payout at 10 PM Central Time.
You don't even have to split 50/50. You can have a script that sets more quota when hashcows is announcing a coin with high profit. For example:Code:
import time,os,sys,socket,json,urllib2
def SendCGCommand (command, param, silent=True):
api_ip = '127.0.0.1'
api_port = 4028
s = None
try:
s = socket.socket (socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((api_ip,int(api_port)))
s.send (json.dumps({"command":command, "parameter":param}))
data = s.recv(4096).replace('\x00','')
if not silent:
response = json.loads (data)
print response
except:
pass
def DumpHashCows ():
usock = [Suspicious link removed]/contact/', timeout = 30)
data = usock.readlines()
usock.close()
profit = 1
for line in data:
if 'Profitability:' in line:
profit = float (line.split (':',1)[1].split('<')[0])
return profit
while True:
cows = DumpHashCows ()
quota = int (cows)
print 'Profit=%.3f' % cows
SendCGCommand ('poolquota', '2,%d' % quota)
time.sleep (60)
Put 2 middlecoin servers as pool 0 and 1 with quota 50 each (or whatever quota you want), and hashcows pool #2 on your miner configdef SendCGCommand (command, param, silent=True):
api_ip = '127.0.0.1'
api_port = 4028
s = None
try:
s = socket.socket (socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((api_ip,int(api_port)))
s.send (json.dumps({"command":command, "parameter":param}))
data = s.recv(4096).replace('\x00','')
if not silent:
response = json.loads (data)
print response
except:
pass
def DumpHashCows ():
usock = [Suspicious link removed]/contact/', timeout = 30)
data = usock.readlines()
usock.close()
profit = 1
for line in data:
if 'Profitability:' in line:
profit = float (line.split (':',1)[1].split('<')[0])
return profit
while True:
cows = DumpHashCows ()
quota = int (cows)
print 'Profit=%.3f' % cows
SendCGCommand ('poolquota', '2,%d' % quota)
time.sleep (60)
That is awesome. Unfortunately I know zero about scripting, so I won't be trying it
January 31, 2014, 04:02:03 PM
I have my miner split 50/50 between Hashcows and Middlecoin and after 5 days Hashcows has actually been outperforming Middlecoin. In fact Hashcows has paid out 29% more than Middlecoin. Of course, YMMV. It seems like when one pool does good the other does poorly. IMHO splitting between the pools evens things out and makes earnings more stable than just mining at one or the other pool. As far as I know, the only balance you can currently trust at Hashcows is the final payout at 10 PM Central Time.
You don't even have to split 50/50. You can have a script that sets more quota when hashcows is announcing a coin with high profit. For example:Code:
import time,os,sys,socket,json,urllib2
def SendCGCommand (command, param, silent=True):
api_ip = '127.0.0.1'
api_port = 4028
s = None
try:
s = socket.socket (socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((api_ip,int(api_port)))
s.send (json.dumps({"command":command, "parameter":param}))
data = s.recv(4096).replace('\x00','')
if not silent:
response = json.loads (data)
print response
except:
pass
def DumpHashCows ():
usock = urllib2.urlopen('https://hashco.ws/contact/', timeout = 30)
data = usock.readlines()
usock.close()
profit = 1
for line in data:
if 'Profitability:' in line:
profit = float (line.split (':',1)[1].split('<')[0])
return profit
while True:
cows = DumpHashCows ()
quota = int (cows)
print 'Profit=%.3f' % cows
SendCGCommand ('poolquota', '2,%d' % quota)
time.sleep (60)
Put 2 middlecoin servers as pool 0 and 1 with quota 50 each (or whatever quota you want), and hashcows pool #2 on your miner config def SendCGCommand (command, param, silent=True):
api_ip = '127.0.0.1'
api_port = 4028
s = None
try:
s = socket.socket (socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.connect((api_ip,int(api_port)))
s.send (json.dumps({"command":command, "parameter":param}))
data = s.recv(4096).replace('\x00','')
if not silent:
response = json.loads (data)
print response
except:
pass
def DumpHashCows ():
usock = urllib2.urlopen('https://hashco.ws/contact/', timeout = 30)
data = usock.readlines()
usock.close()
profit = 1
for line in data:
if 'Profitability:' in line:
profit = float (line.split (':',1)[1].split('<')[0])
return profit
while True:
cows = DumpHashCows ()
quota = int (cows)
print 'Profit=%.3f' % cows
SendCGCommand ('poolquota', '2,%d' % quota)
time.sleep (60)
January 31, 2014, 03:41:29 PM
Dunno if I will keep mining here..
Middlecoin = 0.012 btc after 24hrs (under 2% for rejects & stales).
Hashcows = 0.001 btc after 24hrs (tbc after payment). (under 2% for rejects & stales).
I appreciate market volatility but the basket of coins is less profitable to what middecoin mines.
I think I'll go back to middlecoin, even with its high diff and low effiency as I'm mining 12x more at middle coin.
Mining with 1xr9 280x. I''ll give it until Monday and see how I go (as the balance is apprently borked?), but inital results don't impress when compared to performance at middlecoin. If the expected earnings is anything to go by. Will have to wait until I get paid to get a better idea.
Also any idea on where hashcows exchanges its coins to pay you btc? AS far as I know no exchange provides a trading api that allows you to automate the withdrawal.
So that means someone has to manually withdraw the funds and we have to trust they won't run away with our funds. Hopefully running a pool is profitable andworthwhile rather than scamming us, but the risk is there I guess.
Middlecoin = 0.012 btc after 24hrs (under 2% for rejects & stales).
Hashcows = 0.001 btc after 24hrs (tbc after payment). (under 2% for rejects & stales).
I appreciate market volatility but the basket of coins is less profitable to what middecoin mines.
I think I'll go back to middlecoin, even with its high diff and low effiency as I'm mining 12x more at middle coin.
Mining with 1xr9 280x. I''ll give it until Monday and see how I go (as the balance is apprently borked?), but inital results don't impress when compared to performance at middlecoin. If the expected earnings is anything to go by. Will have to wait until I get paid to get a better idea.
Also any idea on where hashcows exchanges its coins to pay you btc? AS far as I know no exchange provides a trading api that allows you to automate the withdrawal.
So that means someone has to manually withdraw the funds and we have to trust they won't run away with our funds. Hopefully running a pool is profitable andworthwhile rather than scamming us, but the risk is there I guess.
I have my miner split 50/50 between Hashcows and Middlecoin and after 5 days Hashcows has actually been outperforming Middlecoin. In fact Hashcows has paid out 29% more than Middlecoin. Of course, YMMV. It seems like when one pool does good the other does poorly. IMHO splitting between the pools evens things out and makes earnings more stable than just mining at one or the other pool. As far as I know, the only balance you can currently trust at Hashcows is the final payout at 10 PM Central Time.
January 31, 2014, 02:59:29 PM
Dunno if I will keep mining here..
Middlecoin = 0.012 btc after 24hrs (under 2% for rejects & stales).
Hashcows = 0.001 btc after 24hrs (tbc after payment). (under 2% for rejects & stales).
I appreciate market volatility but the basket of coins is less profitable to what middecoin mines.
I think I'll go back to middlecoin, even with its high diff and low effiency as I'm mining 12x more at middle coin.
Mining with 1xr9 280x. I''ll give it until Monday and see how I go (as the balance is apprently borked?), but inital results don't impress when compared to performance at middlecoin. If the expected earnings is anything to go by. Will have to wait until I get paid to get a better idea.
Also any idea on where hashcows exchanges its coins to pay you btc? AS far as I know no exchange provides a trading api that allows you to automate the withdrawal.
So that means someone has to manually withdraw the funds and we have to trust they won't run away with our funds. Hopefully running a pool is profitable andworthwhile rather than scamming us, but the risk is there I guess.
Middlecoin = 0.012 btc after 24hrs (under 2% for rejects & stales).
Hashcows = 0.001 btc after 24hrs (tbc after payment). (under 2% for rejects & stales).
I appreciate market volatility but the basket of coins is less profitable to what middecoin mines.
I think I'll go back to middlecoin, even with its high diff and low effiency as I'm mining 12x more at middle coin.
Mining with 1xr9 280x. I''ll give it until Monday and see how I go (as the balance is apprently borked?), but inital results don't impress when compared to performance at middlecoin. If the expected earnings is anything to go by. Will have to wait until I get paid to get a better idea.
Also any idea on where hashcows exchanges its coins to pay you btc? AS far as I know no exchange provides a trading api that allows you to automate the withdrawal.
So that means someone has to manually withdraw the funds and we have to trust they won't run away with our funds. Hopefully running a pool is profitable andworthwhile rather than scamming us, but the risk is there I guess.
January 31, 2014, 11:52:48 AM
I've noticed the server is going alive, then dead again. Alive now.
BTW, pretty nice payout yesterday.
BTW, pretty nice payout yesterday.
January 31, 2014, 11:21:10 AM
this is from the IRC channel #hashcows on freenode:
<@aTriz> someone please post on btc talk we r awaren looking for the issue n attempting to fix
<@aTriz> someone please post on btc talk we r awaren looking for the issue n attempting to fix
Thanks. Been a very good week on the cows. Thanks to the team and congrats on the new baby.
January 31, 2014, 11:07:06 AM
this is from the IRC channel #hashcows on freenode:
<@aTriz> someone please post on btc talk we r awaren looking for the issue n attempting to fix
<@aTriz> someone please post on btc talk we r awaren looking for the issue n attempting to fix
Jump to: