I would like to say that we have thought through and thought out all possible ways to protect customers. Pimps are really an extra side that criminalizes the scope of sex services
Pimps are not always evil. I think it's something like sales managers
Topic: [ANN][🔥PRE - ICO OPEN🔥] LUST: DECENTRALIZED SEX MARKETPLACE WITH ESCROW! - page 156. (Read 37416 times)
September 19, 2017, 06:12:19 PM
Pimps are not always evil. I think it's something like sales managers
September 19, 2017, 06:11:15 PM
I would like to say that we have thought through and thought out all possible ways to protect customers. Pimps are really an extra side that criminalizes the scope of sex services
September 19, 2017, 06:09:58 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
Yes, that's what we're supposed to do. We have many different protective measures to exclude a third party from the process
I'm not sure that tech support will work. Yes, and not every client to spend time on it
I do not quite agree with this. I think if the service is called upon to get rid of third parties in this process, the client will somehow announce the presence of the pimp
Yes, I also thought about it. Surely the client will be unpleasant and he will at least not come to this girl
And you did not think that the pimp can not just show up? He can simply use the account, communicate with the client and tell the girl when the client comes to her
September 19, 2017, 06:06:59 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
Yes, that's what we're supposed to do. We have many different protective measures to exclude a third party from the process
I'm not sure that tech support will work. Yes, and not every client to spend time on it
I do not quite agree with this. I think if the service is called upon to get rid of third parties in this process, the client will somehow announce the presence of the pimp
Yes, I also thought about it. Surely the client will be unpleasant and he will at least not come to this girl
September 19, 2017, 06:05:53 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
Yes, that's what we're supposed to do. We have many different protective measures to exclude a third party from the process
I'm not sure that tech support will work. Yes, and not every client to spend time on it
I do not quite agree with this. I think if the service is called upon to get rid of third parties in this process, the client will somehow announce the presence of the pimp
September 19, 2017, 05:53:48 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
Yes, that's what we're supposed to do. We have many different protective measures to exclude a third party from the process
I'm not sure that tech support will work. Yes, and not every client to spend time on it
September 19, 2017, 05:50:56 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
Yes, that's what we're supposed to do. We have many different protective measures to exclude a third party from the process
September 19, 2017, 05:49:52 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
It seems to me that if the customer encounters a pimp, he will report to the support service and this account will block
September 19, 2017, 05:47:03 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
Yes, that's what I meant
September 19, 2017, 05:46:29 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
To be honest, a lot of the moments do not coincide with reality. But nevertheless I believe in this project
September 19, 2017, 05:45:37 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
You are unlikely to get rid of pimps. They can just as easily use your application
September 19, 2017, 05:42:43 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
What do you mean by making such a statement?
September 19, 2017, 05:41:45 PM
By the way, no one thought that what Likewise says is not entirely true?
September 19, 2017, 05:40:58 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
What is the reason for this decision? Because you do not have enough money to implement the project? Are you not afraid of the reaction of the community?
Are you still in doubt? Of course, the main reason is money
Even good projects are chasing only money, so there is nothing to be surprised at
September 19, 2017, 05:39:54 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
What is the reason for this decision? Because you do not have enough money to implement the project? Are you not afraid of the reaction of the community?
The question about the reaction of the community is very stupid, it is so obvious
Yes, perhaps, you are right, the community supports this project not as it deserves
September 19, 2017, 05:29:38 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
What is the reason for this decision? Because you do not have enough money to implement the project? Are you not afraid of the reaction of the community?
The question about the reaction of the community is very stupid, it is so obvious
September 19, 2017, 05:27:52 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
What is the reason for this decision? Because you do not have enough money to implement the project? Are you not afraid of the reaction of the community?
Are you still in doubt? Of course, the main reason is money
September 19, 2017, 05:23:24 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
What is the reason for this decision? Because you do not have enough money to implement the project? Are you not afraid of the reaction of the community?
September 19, 2017, 05:22:27 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
Yes that's right
September 19, 2017, 05:16:15 PM
Are there any relevant news?
In addition to the extension of pre-ICO?
I remember correctly, for 10 days?
Jump to: