+1
Topic: [ANN][SHA]SHACoin2 - Dead Revival - Virtual & Physical Coin - Faucet - page 76. (Read 198297 times)
April 04, 2014, 09:45:54 AM
April 04, 2014, 09:38:48 AM
+1 if done correctly
April 04, 2014, 09:38:07 AM
+1
April 04, 2014, 09:35:12 AM
+1
April 04, 2014, 09:30:33 AM
Community: please vote :
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1
Maybe better idea is to create new topic with pool?
+1
+1
April 04, 2014, 09:26:46 AM
Community: please vote :
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1
Maybe better idea is to create new topic with pool?
+1
April 04, 2014, 09:18:41 AM
Community: please vote :
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1
Maybe better idea is to create new topic with pool?
April 04, 2014, 09:12:40 AM
Community: please vote :
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1 +1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
April 04, 2014, 09:10:34 AM
Community: please vote :
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
+1 for hardfork or
-1 for hardfork
April 04, 2014, 09:09:30 AM
Does anyone here want to step up and take the lead on this so we are ready to go forward if the dev decides he wont? I would do it but I am no programmer.
I would love to take over development of this coin. I could also recompile the current windows wallet, but I do not think that will fix all the issues some people are having. My thought is that, we do the equivalent of a "hard fork". First I would notify all the current exchanges, and have them suspend trading. Second, we would pick a date, time, and block number. Third, I would recompile all the wallets with an enumerated version number, and I would set up my own seed node with the new wallet. Once that is done, everyone can download the new wallet and sync with the new node. I believe that would fix all of our current problems.
I do have some concerns though.
1) I do not want to offend or insult the current dev.
2) How do we determine if there is a general consensus to move forward with this?
Sounds good to me, but what with the website and forum?
April 04, 2014, 08:43:59 AM
What need for make node? Just compile daemon & sync it on dedicated or vps & after just give ip for ppl wanna use it ?
April 04, 2014, 08:37:24 AM
Would you like to have your coin listed on www.crycurex.com ?
One of the lowest trade fees - 0.09 % per trade
https://crycurex.com/info/add-currency/
One of the lowest trade fees - 0.09 % per trade
https://crycurex.com/info/add-currency/
April 04, 2014, 08:37:04 AM
April 04, 2014, 08:33:13 AM
put a poll,
asking whether they wanna hard fork then base on that implement the action
asking whether they wanna hard fork then base on that implement the action
Agreed, We have a very active community for this coin with people trying to develop games and such for it. We need a good working wallet and SHA will move up!
April 04, 2014, 08:15:35 AM
put a poll,
asking whether they wanna hard fork then base on that implement the action
asking whether they wanna hard fork then base on that implement the action
April 04, 2014, 08:11:54 AM
Does anyone here want to step up and take the lead on this so we are ready to go forward if the dev decides he wont? I would do it but I am no programmer.
I would love to take over development of this coin. I could also recompile the current windows wallet, but I do not think that will fix all the issues some people are having. My thought is that, we do the equivalent of a "hard fork". First I would notify all the current exchanges, and have them suspend trading. Second, we would pick a date, time, and block number. Third, I would recompile all the wallets with an enumerated version number, and I would set up my own seed node with the new wallet. Once that is done, everyone can download the new wallet and sync with the new node. I believe that would fix all of our current problems.
I do have some concerns though.
1) I do not want to offend or insult the current dev.
2) How do we determine if there is a general consensus to move forward with this?
April 04, 2014, 08:09:05 AM
anyone having sync issues now please try my settings above and report back. adding the rpc and p2p ports, and increasing the maxconnections seems to be helping me. I would like some feedback so i can keep trawling through the code and debug file.
April 04, 2014, 08:08:22 AM
Does anyone here want to step up and take the lead on this so we are ready to go forward if the dev decides he wont? I would do it but I am no programmer.
I would love to take over development of this coin. I could also recompile the current windows wallet, but I do not think that will fix all the issues some people are having. My thought is that, we do the equivalent of a "hard fork". First I would notify all the current exchanges, and have them suspend trading. Second, we would pick a date, time, and block number. Third, I would recompile all the wallets with an enumerated version number, and I would set up my own seed node with the new wallet. Once that is done, everyone can download the new wallet and sync with the new node. I believe that would fix all of our current problems.
I do have some concerns though.
1) I do not want to offend or insult the current dev.
2) How do we determine if there is a general consensus to move forward with this?
Well, dev has amble time to respond and take action but he failed at that so I don't think there will be any insult taken.
Put up a poll for your proposed action and if majority is favored, then we move forward. The sooner the better.
-tb-
April 04, 2014, 08:02:20 AM
Does anyone here want to step up and take the lead on this so we are ready to go forward if the dev decides he wont? I would do it but I am no programmer.
I would love to take over development of this coin. I could also recompile the current windows wallet, but I do not think that will fix all the issues some people are having. My thought is that, we do the equivalent of a "hard fork". First I would notify all the current exchanges, and have them suspend trading. Second, we would pick a date, time, and block number. Third, I would recompile all the wallets with an enumerated version number, and I would set up my own seed node with the new wallet. Once that is done, everyone can download the new wallet and sync with the new node. I believe that would fix all of our current problems.
I do have some concerns though.
1) I do not want to offend or insult the current dev.
2) How do we determine if there is a general consensus to move forward with this?
Great to see someone putting their hand up. You have my support and help 100%.
1) I have sent the existing developer an email today stating if he is no longer interested in developing the coin would he be happy to hand development to someone else. I will let you know if i get a response.
2) Just read through the last few pages. There is a heavy consensus this is a great coin and the current dev is not supporting it. I think you would have little trouble having the majority of community agreeing to a hard fork.
April 04, 2014, 08:01:47 AM
I think we have given a reasonable amount of time to at least get some sort of a reply (forum post, PM, email).
Personally I think the dev was in a bit over his/her head.
Personally I think the dev was in a bit over his/her head.
Jump to: