I'm not trying to take anyone's money, but rather to help the community of which I am part to set some rules with incentives for the right things.
Right. So with this new rule, if somebody invested after you, his share becomes smaller, while yours bigger, correct? How is it not taking his money?
I don't care one way or the other, it's just more work for me, but I could factor in the account's age (how to measure it, by the way? by registration? first deposit?).
I just don't think it's fair and that it creates unnecessary mess, but if the majority of investors think it's the way to go - I can do it.
I understand your point but your examples are very funny. By the same rule you mention I am taking money already from people who will use or buy the coin later, just because "I happened to find this thread, took the risk and invested some of my money and time to help develop the project and community", right? By the same rule I could complain that you are already taking money from all of us, when in fact you are the one who puts in the hard work to make things happen.
Irrespective of whether I am taking money or not, I think we should do it the right way and set incentives for what matters. With the right incentives in place you create a natural-selection mechanism which filters investors from speculators.
Risk and reward are inextricably bound, that is how reality works. If you have a problem with that, try to change it and see what happens.
By the way, here is a very good essay on the matter:
http://paulgraham.com/inequality.htmlSince we are trying to build a long term project of superior simplicity and quality you can take the time and read it, I think it will be worth it.
P.S. Lets not haste to make a quick decision but a smart one.
)
