Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us - page 101. (Read 424294 times)

newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Which port is your pool zero???
Read the last two pages and the home page. flound has patched us into p2pool BTC!!!
Keep yer pants on, payouts gonna git regular  Grin

pool1.us.multipool.us:8888

It started hashing again, and is now back to "requested work update" -- did an "increasing queue minimum to 3" a bit ago as well.  Do I need to reconfigure anything in my command line?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
BTW, currently the P2pool server lives in the USA, I will be setting up an EU p2pool for the EU pool servers as well.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
We have plenty of hash for NVC and FTC, but I will consider it.  
I recommend running for a week or so with BTC and maybe LTC before considering NVC. I can't see any benefit for FTC.

So, I saw your home page note that P2Pool is live for BTC. So does that mean port 3332 goes away and we only hash for BTC when MP rotates to it?

Nope, anyone can still connect to 3332 anytime, it is proxied to P2Pool.

One caveat is that the p2pool currently does not check worker names.  It will happily accept hash from whomever.  So please make sure your workers are set up properly so you get paid.

sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
dfgfdgfdg
Stratum from Pool 0 requested work update.  (over and over)

Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us.

Staged work underrun; increasing queue minimum to 2.

Running bfgminer, and not getting anywhere with the block erupters any more (green solid lights).  No hashrate showing on multipool.us home page.
Which port is your pool zero???
Read the last two pages and the home page. flound has patched us into p2pool BTC!!!
Keep yer pants on, payouts gonna git regular  Grin
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Stratum from Pool 0 requested work update.  (over and over)

Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us.

Staged work underrun; increasing queue minimum to 2.

Running bfgminer, and not getting anywhere with the block erupters any more (green solid lights).  No hashrate showing on multipool.us home page.

(EDIT -- Nevermind.  They are running now.)
sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
dfgfdgfdg
We have plenty of hash for NVC and FTC, but I will consider it. 
I recommend running for a week or so with BTC and maybe LTC before considering NVC. I can't see any benefit for FTC.

So, I saw your home page note that P2Pool is live for BTC. So does that mean port 3332 goes away and we only hash for BTC when MP rotates to it?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
p2pool is up and running and we've found our first 2 p2pool shares!  (not surprising since we should find one about every 30 minutes)

2013-11-05 23:32:47.617383  Shares: 2 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ~0.0% (0-66%) Efficiency: ~117.5% (40-118%) Current payout: 0.0165 BTC
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
We have (very basic) DB connectivity from p2pool!

mysql> select username,sum(difficulty) from shares group by username;
+----------------+-----------------+
| username       | sum(difficulty) |
+----------------+-----------------+
| flound1129.bfl |            1811 |
+----------------+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Following flounder's 'no major changes before sleeping' rule, p2pool on BTC will be enabled tomorrow.  Tonight is the last night to claim the block bounty!

If this works out well, I may enable it for LTC as well.



If it works for ltc why not add for NVC and ftc or even make the whole multipool p2pool friendly.  More hashrate means more coins found for us.  Would be another thing that makes our pool standout.

We have plenty of hash for NVC and FTC, but I will consider it. 
hero member
Activity: 821
Merit: 503
We have (very basic) DB connectivity from p2pool!

mysql> select username,sum(difficulty) from shares group by username;
+----------------+-----------------+
| username       | sum(difficulty) |
+----------------+-----------------+
| flound1129.bfl |            1811 |
+----------------+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Following flounder's 'no major changes before sleeping' rule, p2pool on BTC will be enabled tomorrow.  Tonight is the last night to claim the block bounty!

If this works out well, I may enable it for LTC as well.



If it works for ltc why not add for NVC and ftc or even make the whole multipool p2pool friendly.  More hashrate means more coins found for us.  Would be another thing that makes our pool standout.

+1


Agree, also my nvc is still stuck in limbo Sad
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
We have (very basic) DB connectivity from p2pool!

mysql> select username,sum(difficulty) from shares group by username;
+----------------+-----------------+
| username       | sum(difficulty) |
+----------------+-----------------+
| flound1129.bfl |            1811 |
+----------------+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Following flounder's 'no major changes before sleeping' rule, p2pool on BTC will be enabled tomorrow.  Tonight is the last night to claim the block bounty!

If this works out well, I may enable it for LTC as well.



If it works for ltc why not add for NVC and ftc or even make the whole multipool p2pool friendly.  More hashrate means more coins found for us.  Would be another thing that makes our pool standout.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
An error occurred during a connection to www.multipool.us. The OCSP server has no status for the certificate. (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_unknown_cert)

Just me?
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Did you, and/or your destination update your client(s)?  There was a DGC hard fork yesterday.

I see the coins have arrived, so that probably was the issue. Thanks for looking into it.

-David

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
I noticed this morning my DGC withdrawals did not reach their destination. This began around 11/5/13 at 2:30AM (EST). The transactions are not showing in the DGC blockchain, so I'm hoping they're just stuck somewhere. Thanks.

Destination address: DQHwz6neVWW9hyYTaqMiAUowvqn1wyzVd7
username: dnelsonfl
8 transactions as of 11/5/13 9:00AM EST.


Did you, and/or your destination update your client(s)?  There was a DGC hard fork yesterday.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1452
Latest cgminer seems a bit buggy between coins, whats the best version people here are using
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
I noticed this morning my DGC withdrawals did not reach their destination. This began around 11/5/13 at 2:30AM (EST). The transactions are not showing in the DGC blockchain, so I'm hoping they're just stuck somewhere. Thanks.

Destination address: DQHwz6neVWW9hyYTaqMiAUowvqn1wyzVd7
username: dnelsonfl
8 transactions as of 11/5/13 9:00AM EST.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
We have (very basic) DB connectivity from p2pool!

mysql> select username,sum(difficulty) from shares group by username;
+----------------+-----------------+
| username       | sum(difficulty) |
+----------------+-----------------+
| flound1129.bfl |            1811 |
+----------------+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Following flounder's 'no major changes before sleeping' rule, p2pool on BTC will be enabled tomorrow.  Tonight is the last night to claim the block bounty!

If this works out well, I may enable it for LTC as well.

sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
dfgfdgfdg
You've really put some thought into this. Sounds good!

Glad you've figured out a way to save the sha-256 multiport  Grin
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
I'm fairly close to having the BTC port connected to p2pool.  All I need to do is learn Ruby real quick Smiley
If you port to another pool before we find a block then what happens to our Round Shares Shocked Huh

I'll pay all the shares in the db over and over again until we reach X BTC worth of payouts.  (I'll have to figure out what X should be at some point, but it'd obviously have to be at least 25.)

Why p2pool? Bitminter is much bigger and much more consistent. See figure 6 http://organofcorti.blogspot.ca/

I think this is a really good idea. Clearly we just don't have enough muscle go it alone yet.

Several reasons.

1. P2pool payouts show up as generate transactions in our wallet.  That means almost no modification to our current payout setup. The payouts show up exactly as if they were mined blocks.  If we go with another pool I have to add logic to find out the block # from the remote pool, then figure out how much our payout was from that particular block, etc.
2. It's decentralized, as opposed to a single pool which can be dos'd, hacked, etc.
3. Because we run our own node(s), the latency and up to 3% additional stales we'd be subject to by running stratum-proxy to another pool are not an issue.
4. Extremely easy to set up merged mining.

There are a few other reasons, but those are the main ones.
sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
dfgfdgfdg
I'm fairly close to having the BTC port connected to p2pool.  All I need to do is learn Ruby real quick Smiley
If you port to another pool before we find a block then what happens to our Round Shares Shocked Huh

Why p2pool? Bitminter is much bigger and much more consistent. See figure 6 http://organofcorti.blogspot.ca/

I think this is a really good idea. Clearly we just don't have enough muscle go it alone yet.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
www.multipool.us
Actually if anyone here knows Ruby and wants Hero Member status, I have a small amount of work you could do.

I'll also give you the bounty I was planning to give out for the first BTC block if we can get ourselves hooked up to p2pool before we find one.
Pages:
Jump to: