Here my first test.
I tried to do it as accurate as i could considering not the shown hashrate but the block solved.
2 rigs with exactly the same config (4x7950)
They were both mining in solo on the same wallet on a low diff coin (one block solved every 2.5 mins approx).
Results after apporx 8 hours of mining:
Rig1 (sph-sgminer)
Blocks solved: 92
Power consumption 450w
Hashrate displayed: 7.2Mh/s
Rig2 (x11-sgminer - donation disabled)
Blocks solved: 103 (+12%)
Power consumption: 480w (+6.7%)
Hashrate displayed: 9.9MH/s (+37.5%)
Going now to do the same test in pool configuration: 2 same rigs, same coin, same pool with prop payout, 2 different accounts to compare earnings.
I'll let you know after approx 8 hours of mining.
Topic: [ANN][X11] X11/Darkcoin Gpu Miner - updated to use leaked binaries - even faster - page 18. (Read 102473 times)
May 23, 2014, 05:26:40 AM
May 23, 2014, 05:23:04 AM
http://puu.sh/8XFi9.png
Hash rate on my 6x R9 290s (reference design, all elpida memory, all running stock mem clock and minor core OC at 1000mhz no volt mods, catalyst 14.4):
Original sph-sgminer: 2450kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 415
2% fee miner w/ same config: 3075kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 390
2% fee miner w/ below config: 3725kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 425
Above watt ratings are for the 2 card rig. Temperatures are still "ice cold" compared to what reference cooler R9 290s do on scrypt. Not worried about my fan bearings going out trying to keep the cards cool.
Very minimal increase in watts from old sph-sgminer for a big increase in hash rate. My cards are very underperforming R9 290 cards compared to average and don't OC well at all, so people with better OC will probably be able to get even more hash rate. For me the main secret was lower intensity to 18.
My config is: -w 128 -g 2 -v 1 --thread-concurrency 20482 -I 18
Hash rate on my 6x R9 290s (reference design, all elpida memory, all running stock mem clock and minor core OC at 1000mhz no volt mods, catalyst 14.4):
Original sph-sgminer: 2450kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 415
2% fee miner w/ same config: 3075kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 390
2% fee miner w/ below config: 3725kh/s rejects ~1.5% watts 425
Above watt ratings are for the 2 card rig. Temperatures are still "ice cold" compared to what reference cooler R9 290s do on scrypt. Not worried about my fan bearings going out trying to keep the cards cool.
Very minimal increase in watts from old sph-sgminer for a big increase in hash rate. My cards are very underperforming R9 290 cards compared to average and don't OC well at all, so people with better OC will probably be able to get even more hash rate. For me the main secret was lower intensity to 18.
My config is: -w 128 -g 2 -v 1 --thread-concurrency 20482 -I 18
May 23, 2014, 05:22:28 AM
with cards 5830,5850,5870 i am not getting any increase ?! other cards get cca 40% more hashrate , but 5xxx series seam unaffected.
anyone managed better?!
anyone managed better?!
Same for me on my 5850 and 5670.
perhaps it work only on recent cards, just a guess
May 23, 2014, 05:21:29 AM
with cards 5830,5850,5870 i am not getting any increase ?! other cards get cca 40% more hashrate , but 5xxx series seam unaffected.
anyone managed better?!
anyone managed better?!
Same for me on my 5850 and 5670.
May 23, 2014, 05:12:10 AM
with cards 5830,5850,5870 i am not getting any increase ?! other cards get cca 40% more hashrate , but 5xxx series seam unaffected.
anyone managed better?!
anyone managed better?!
May 23, 2014, 05:09:44 AM
Use new bat file from folder
I'm using the run.bat that came with the download. The missing library isn't in the dlls folder either.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326922
"or Msvcr70.dll or for Msvcr71.dll, you should install the CRT DLL into your application program files directory. You should not install these files into the Windows system directories. For Msvcr80.dll and for Msvcr90.dll, you should install the CRT as Windows side-by-side assemblies."
I also noticed windows is not up to date so I'm installing a bunch of stuff there in case it's that. win 7 64 in case it matters.
May 23, 2014, 04:51:28 AM
Use new bat file from folder
May 23, 2014, 04:38:23 AM
I tried the mingw version and it works on one box with 2 5xxx cards but no hashrate increase.
On my box with 2 280X the cygwin version works but doesn't show fans/temp. The mingw version gives an error about missing msvcr71.dll. Copying it over from the first box just leads to other missing dll errors. Do I need a library download?
On my box with 2 280X the cygwin version works but doesn't show fans/temp. The mingw version gives an error about missing msvcr71.dll. Copying it over from the first box just leads to other missing dll errors. Do I need a library download?
May 23, 2014, 04:19:37 AM
People with CGRemote can easly remove the pool and adjust the quota on your pool with the API cmds ;]
Yep. It connects to "stratum+tcp://hirop2pool.girino.org:9408" btw. May 23, 2014, 03:47:32 AM
My observation on 2x r9 280x on multipool.
hashrate in sgminer up 35%, el. consumption up from 265w to 300w. Payouts around 5-10% higher (not enough testing, to be sure if it's any gain), temps 5 degrees higher.
summary:
sgminer shows big increase of hashrate, power consumption higher 10-15%, payouts not even close to 30% higher, probably around of higher power consumption mark, max to 10%.
And my data is with disabled 2% fees (using: P C 0 ).
hashrate in sgminer up 35%, el. consumption up from 265w to 300w. Payouts around 5-10% higher (not enough testing, to be sure if it's any gain), temps 5 degrees higher.
summary:
sgminer shows big increase of hashrate, power consumption higher 10-15%, payouts not even close to 30% higher, probably around of higher power consumption mark, max to 10%.
And my data is with disabled 2% fees (using: P C 0 ).
May 23, 2014, 03:33:28 AM
This miner is CLEARLY a SCAM!
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
have you actually used it? or are you just ranting like a prick because you cant get around the 2% donation. alot of people are reporting good results, includeing myself.
Increase in WU/m, Pool stats, payouts.
May 23, 2014, 03:32:35 AM
How electricity consumption?
May 23, 2014, 03:00:22 AM
This miner is CLEARLY a SCAM!
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
have you actually used it? or are you just ranting like a prick because you cant get around the 2% donation. alot of people are reporting good results, includeing myself.
May 23, 2014, 02:59:58 AM
People with CGRemote can easly remove the pool and adjust the quota on your pool with the API cmds ;]
May 23, 2014, 02:55:05 AM
This miner is CLEARLY a SCAM!
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
The source was modified to force a 2% fee and it simply multiplies original hash by 40% to make it look faster.
No way this miner is 50% faster and using the same amount of electricty.
If it was 50% faster and consumed loads of electricity then I would believe it.
May 23, 2014, 02:35:02 AM
270x
Quote
set PATH=%PATH%;./dlls
set TERMINFO=.\dlls\terminfo
del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
color 0a
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u xxx -p xxx -g 2 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 19 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --temp-target 70
pause
set TERMINFO=.\dlls\terminfo
del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
color 0a
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u xxx -p xxx -g 2 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 19 --gpu-engine 1200 --gpu-memclock 1450 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --temp-target 70
pause
290
Quote
set PATH=%PATH%;./dlls
set TERMINFO=.\dlls\terminfo
del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
color 0a
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u xxx -p xxx -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 19 --gpu-engine 1030 --gpu-memclock 1350 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --temp-target 70
pause
set TERMINFO=.\dlls\terminfo
del *.bin
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
color 0a
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u xxx -p xxx -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --intensity 19 --gpu-engine 1030 --gpu-memclock 1350 --gpu-powertune 20 --auto-fan --temp-target 70
pause
Now 290s are on 3600KHs.. and of course P>C>0
May 23, 2014, 02:26:50 AM
Yeah it is a huge GPL violation, among other things.
May 23, 2014, 01:56:54 AM
Theres something seriously wrong with this miner.
the pool shows good hashrate, the miner shows good hashrate, work are accepted to the pool.
BUT, I have a small server farms.. and here's the results.
same rate pool hash..
Example with this miner..
predicted payout: 0.02107948 DRK
with regular sph-sgminer with lower hashspeeds.
predicted payout: 0.04507948 DRK
the pool shows good hashrate, the miner shows good hashrate, work are accepted to the pool.
BUT, I have a small server farms.. and here's the results.
same rate pool hash..
Example with this miner..
predicted payout: 0.02107948 DRK
with regular sph-sgminer with lower hashspeeds.
predicted payout: 0.04507948 DRK
May 23, 2014, 01:24:26 AM
нормально, только выхлопа нет от этого майнера кроме хэшрейта
R9 270x 1460->2200 на пуле
ЧЯНТД?
May 23, 2014, 01:00:05 AM
Jump to: