Everyone, don't look at hashrates and WU. Check real figures in pools, accepted shares, income etc. Especially i got big doubt that "modded" miner able to enrich us even a bit as watt consumption still the same.
BTW, "miner" connects to:
142.4.207.120:3335
141.0.76.167:9408
Topic: [ANN][X11] X11/Darkcoin Gpu Miner - updated to use leaked binaries - even faster - page 34. (Read 102473 times)
May 20, 2014, 11:21:20 AM
May 20, 2014, 11:20:06 AM
What about all those peeps reporting no temperature change?
More optimization, more power usage, no escape from that.
I call scam.
i had temperature change and WU change but pool not seeing my hashrate More optimization, more power usage, no escape from that.
I call scam.
May 20, 2014, 11:12:22 AM
What about all those peeps reporting no temperature change?
More optimization, more power usage, no escape from that.
I call scam.
More optimization, more power usage, no escape from that.
I call scam.
May 20, 2014, 11:12:03 AM
This is main 280x water cooled on 1200/1500 1175mv windows 8.1 update 1 13.12 drivers
May 20, 2014, 11:06:17 AM
thanks ,I have already tried and it seemed the hashrate increased ownsome.
I am just waiting the great income of the first day,hope it
I am just waiting the great income of the first day,hope it
May 20, 2014, 10:40:13 AM
i got only 20% increase (but 2% goes to donator so 18% only)
options:
-I 13 --xintensity 4 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 -g 2 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192
--gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500 --auto-fan --gpu-powertune 0
--temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 87
meaby i miss something ?
options:
-I 13 --xintensity 4 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 -g 2 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192
--gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500 --auto-fan --gpu-powertune 0
--temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 87
meaby i miss something ?
You should increase -I to at least 18. -I 13 is too slow for your GPU. I have best results with -I 19 on my r9 280x
May 20, 2014, 10:38:42 AM
cygcurl file-4.dll not see how to fix
win 8.1 not run
win 8.1 not run
There's a "dlls" folder in the zip file. You need to add it to the path. When running with the .bat file included, it does that automatically, but if not, you need to set it on your system.
May 20, 2014, 10:37:28 AM
it works flawlessly you have some problem with your pool mate
no problem with sph and problem with girino so strange miner!
may be you will share screenshots with Pool 0 accepted shares?
Well pool 0 is MY pool, so you are saying that you are mining only for you, not for me...
May 20, 2014, 10:23:47 AM
It's lower.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
it make sense because if the cards aren't drawing more power they can't perform a better hashrate, you can't escape from this
high reject rates for me 10% on all my 3.1mhs 280x. less shares accepted aswell..goin back to sph-sgminer
May 20, 2014, 10:13:17 AM
It's lower.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
it make sense because if the cards aren't drawing more power they can't perform a better hashrate, you can't escape from this
May 20, 2014, 10:08:21 AM
It's lower.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.
May 20, 2014, 10:01:11 AM
did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized
also more consumption
also more consumption
I'm using it on two HD7950's and the power consumption is around the same, give or take 10W.
Mh/s and WU seems higher. The pool I'm using hasn't entirely made up its mind about whether or not the figures are actually true...
Edit:
I just rented my own rig at Betarigs for 3 hours so I can use the graphs that get displayed there.
Will let you know whether or not the reported Mh/s is higher than usual.
May 20, 2014, 09:57:30 AM
did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized
also more consumption
also more consumption
May 20, 2014, 09:53:02 AM
after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
WU is hogher like speed, 50% gain but still pool not showing this hashrate.
somebody checked that 2% is really 2% ?
May 20, 2014, 09:26:10 AM
Code:
[08:11][root@pimp:/opt/sph-sgminer]# ./sgminer -k darkcoin -c config.conf
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./sgminer)
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./sgminer)
guess I'll have to way for the sourcecode :[
Code:
nano /etc/apt/sources.list
#Tesing
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing non-free contrib main
Code:
apt-get update
apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev
May 20, 2014, 09:25:10 AM
Speed at the pool is constantly falling. Now there is no gain in speed. Only miner shows inflated figures.
May 20, 2014, 09:20:09 AM
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
That`s it what is the setting for 290 non x
-tc 20481 or 22529-w 256
-I 21
-g 1
PS Now I`m working to generate correct *.bin files with this miner to import It to the ordinary sph-sgminer directory
May 20, 2014, 09:08:49 AM
after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs
about 50% gains
EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.
May 20, 2014, 08:44:03 AM
After 20 minutes of testing:
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
I like the "No temperature changes" part
If no temp changes then its great .
May 20, 2014, 08:27:09 AM
After 20 minutes of testing:
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.
So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.
No settings changed. No temperature changes.
Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...
I like the "No temperature changes" part
Jump to: