Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties! - page 168. (Read 215807 times)

pallas,will XCN continue to develop?btc38 exchange will shift.

You can try one of these two:

• Use the blockchain snapshot, as explained in the first post
• Run the wallet with the -resync option

Hi Pallas. Today after launch wallet i have this error:



Before that everything worked perfectly. Any solution for solve this?
Thanks!

I think the problem he's experiencing is about not being able to insert the password at all cuz the box doesn't appear.

No problems for me on chromium/linux, though you can't hit enter, you need to click the button :-D

Had some problems with trading password in English version of site using Chrome. On Firefox working totally fine. Or switch to Chinese version.

Your hashrate miner/ poolside?

What kind of joining do you wanna do? Developing, mining...

What a cool Coin? Where do I join?

I can't get the djm34 ccminer to work no matter what I do... Says I am missing some .dll file that I am not missing "VCRUNTIME140.dll"... I tried a million fixes and of course none of them worked. Like I said, I am NOT missing this file and every other version of ccminer works on my computer just fine... Needless to say I am using some 2014 miner and I am getting 15MH total with 3 GTX 1080ti's

--EDIT: I have fixed the runtime error and now I get the same error that has been reported on the github and is still currently open... Oh well... off to mine something else until a miner that works is developed I guess.

--EDIT #2: I finally got it all to work. The ccminer wanted the visual 2015 C++ x86 to work, I was only installing the x64 which is why it wasn't working. Just an FYI for anyone else who might have the same issue.

I think the best way is if everybody with stuck coins opens a ticket there, and bother them until they fix.
I did what I could to make them reopen the wallet (months ago, and for weeks), they finally did it just for withdrawals, then blocked it again without notice.
I.e. there is nothing technical...

Pallas,

Any news from Poloniex? My coins are stuck 

XCN  use   cny    transaction

i sold at 400
and now 600  jesus

Not that I know of... But I don't read chinese :-)

Is there some upcoming news or it's just an instant p&d ?

someone on btc38 is pumping xcn again big!
the chinese really love our coin ;-)

Devs please contact with Support Poloniex about frozen wallet (without withdraw).
Community have problem with old exchange but voice for new ((
Peace and quiet.

New block explorer:

http://xcn-explorer.miners-zone.net/

Please test it.

Thanks!

Hmm, PoC is interesting, too. But it fails to address the problem I'm trying to solve:
Whatever scarce resource we take for mining, sooner or later there will be one entity having most of it and therefore dominating the whole mining scene. PoC will lead to someone having MASSIVE datacenters full of old-fashioned mechanical hard drives - well at least it wouldn't use as much energy as PoW.
PoS is the same - whoever has the biggest share of money at one point generates most income. It's actually even worse because the rewards are completely independent of any contribution to the network (transaction processing).

My point was that instead of searching for a better scarce resource, we should take the incentive away which is leading to this concentration of resources in the first place, by changing the reward system. As long as there are rewards encouraging people to somehow get more of a share than others, there will be someone figuring out a way how to do it.

So instead, the new reward system would have to pay all participants in a predictable way based on useful contribution to the network. And the only actually useful contribution to the network is processing of new transactions, managing account databases and maybe acting as a block explorer - all of which doesn't use much resources at all. That's what it's about and that's what should be rewarded. So whoever helps with that processing, gets a reward proportional to created value in the network. And that proportion could just as well be the same number as every other participant gets, because just by being online and forwarding/processing transactions, he's helping the network.
This way, there will be no incentive for anyone to throw more resources into the game because there's nothing to gain for him - just as there wouldn't be any benefit for the network! Still, he would have an incentive to stay online and contribute because otherwise, he'll get nothing. This sort of mining should easily run in the background, using 1-2% of cpu time max. Same goes for network usage because there would suddenly be a lot more miners as there are now, simply because it has suddenly become cheap to run a miner. This would allow the network to grow and make the coin actually useable as real money.

I'm convinced that whichever coin ends up being "the one coin" for everybody to use, it would have to use a mining approach that somewhat resembles these ideas.

There is one downside to this approach though:
It wouldn't be possible any more to jump at a fresh alt coin and generate some quick buck with your high-spec mining gear. But for that, we have plenty of regular coins out there

edit: I might add that a hybrid PoS / Proof-of-Contribution (above) might also be good. I do like the idea of stakeholders being vested in the currency and therefore trying to keep harm from the system.