I can't without GPU :/.
Btw. I want to discuss with community maybe package deal to some exchange to list us (4 coins: XCN, SLM, DTC, and FRC - Freicoin), with 50% discount, what do you think, would you agree?
I think we can negotiate it, and if not freiexchange can list you for free (or almost free).
So I have asked them (korean exchange - gopax), and they told us that they if we decide, guy will try to negotiate with management and get us listed for 2 BTC, 3 or 4 coins.
I have talked also with dtc and freicoin about this, what is your take on it? 0.5btc per coin or 0.66btc per coin
Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties! - page 45. (Read 215672 times)
March 07, 2018, 04:48:15 PM
March 07, 2018, 04:22:19 PM
It's your choice, but I would like to buy some too, if anyone is willing to sell lol.
You should mine some.......
March 07, 2018, 07:15:37 AM
It's your choice, but I would like to buy some too, if anyone is willing to sell lol.
March 07, 2018, 01:50:28 AM
I support which ever keeps my coins 
Took 4 years to mine.
Took 4 years to mine.Same here! Proof is in the explorer
Hello Cryptonite fans
I have made a XCN Facebook Page, if you could take a moment to hit the like button that would be awesome! https://www.facebook.com/XCN.mini.blockchain/
If you all would like, I can make a Group for mining,development, and general discussion and link it to the page. I know most of you are too cool for Facebook 
but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience.
but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience. also for you creative members of the Cryptonite community, we could really use some fresh graphics!
Wow, great logo artwork! We should use it officially together with a new homepage!
March 06, 2018, 01:53:36 PM
Hello Cryptonite fans
I have made a XCN Facebook Page, if you could take a moment to hit the like button that would be awesome! https://www.facebook.com/XCN.mini.blockchain/
If you all would like, I can make a Group for mining,development, and general discussion and link it to the page. I know most of you are too cool for Facebook but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience.
but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience. also for you creative members of the Cryptonite community, we could really use some fresh graphics!
Good initiative mate! Will follow your page, I mean XCN page
March 06, 2018, 11:28:34 AM
I support which ever keeps my coins Took 4 years to mine.
Emphasis should be made on 'community based' maybe with rewards on contributions to commits.
Took 4 years to mine.Emphasis should be made on 'community based' maybe with rewards on contributions to commits.
March 06, 2018, 09:19:41 AM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
But as I understand, if you want to send hacked coins to the wallet it won't accept it, yes?
So maybe you should do a coin swap to new blockchain with rebranding?
Anybody, who would be interested would migrate and swap coins, and old chain would remain, but undeveloped.
It's not that easy. We can't know which transactions include hacked coins when coming from an exchange, and also what to do with transactions that contain both hacked and honest coins. That's why it should have been a task for the exchange itself, as they may easily know which user received the hacked coins first, and folow the history from there.
So this means, you can withdraw hacked coins to your wallet? Something like zcoin terrible flaw.
So maybe it's a good idea to swap coins to new blockchain with anyone who would want to participate and start new coin? Because it's a mess now...
that is a possibility.
in brief, we could:
- keep it as is and start a new coin, with same codebase but different name and new blockchain.
- just rebrand the current coin.
- organise a coin swap to a new blockchain, with optional rebranding (at least the name/ticker will need to change, to avoid confusion).
you can read about CSC here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/oldcsccasinocoin-a-digital-currency-for-the-regulated-online-gaming-sector-616792
they were in our situation cryptopia delist them because of double spend attack .
they decided to do a coin swap. they gave to user 2 months time for coin swap after 2 month 90% of all total supply swapped(and burned) and 10% remain will be used for foundation( will be use for bounty; new exchange; and etc)
March 06, 2018, 07:43:18 AM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
But as I understand, if you want to send hacked coins to the wallet it won't accept it, yes?
So maybe you should do a coin swap to new blockchain with rebranding?
Anybody, who would be interested would migrate and swap coins, and old chain would remain, but undeveloped.
It's not that easy. We can't know which transactions include hacked coins when coming from an exchange, and also what to do with transactions that contain both hacked and honest coins. That's why it should have been a task for the exchange itself, as they may easily know which user received the hacked coins first, and folow the history from there.
So this means, you can withdraw hacked coins to your wallet? Something like zcoin terrible flaw.
So maybe it's a good idea to swap coins to new blockchain with anyone who would want to participate and start new coin? Because it's a mess now...
that is a possibility.
in brief, we could:
- keep it as is and start a new coin, with same codebase but different name and new blockchain.
- just rebrand the current coin.
- organise a coin swap to a new blockchain, with optional rebranding (at least the name/ticker will need to change, to avoid confusion).
March 06, 2018, 06:59:32 AM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
But as I understand, if you want to send hacked coins to the wallet it won't accept it, yes?
So maybe you should do a coin swap to new blockchain with rebranding?
Anybody, who would be interested would migrate and swap coins, and old chain would remain, but undeveloped.
It's not that easy. We can't know which transactions include hacked coins when coming from an exchange, and also what to do with transactions that contain both hacked and honest coins. That's why it should have been a task for the exchange itself, as they may easily know which user received the hacked coins first, and folow the history from there.
So this means, you can withdraw hacked coins to your wallet? Something like zcoin terrible flaw.
So maybe it's a good idea to swap coins to new blockchain with anyone who would want to participate and start new coin? Because it's a mess now...
March 06, 2018, 06:43:19 AM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
But as I understand, if you want to send hacked coins to the wallet it won't accept it, yes?
So maybe you should do a coin swap to new blockchain with rebranding?
Anybody, who would be interested would migrate and swap coins, and old chain would remain, but undeveloped.
It's not that easy. We can't know which transactions include hacked coins when coming from an exchange, and also what to do with transactions that contain both hacked and honest coins. That's why it should have been a task for the exchange itself, as they may easily know which user received the hacked coins first, and folow the history from there.
March 05, 2018, 11:58:14 PM
Are they still tradeable on AEX ?
Are ppl able to withdraw?
Did I read that XCN can do 30,000 TPS???
Are ppl able to withdraw?
Did I read that XCN can do 30,000 TPS???
Where did you read XCN can do 30.000 tx/s?
No, it can't do such big amount, at least for now.
I think realistic goal is to have about 960tx/s (32MB blocks) - @pallas - can you confirm, that it's possible?
No one has ever tested the network to see how much it can handle. With theoretically unlimited block size quite a bit should be possible. I think the bottleneck will be either in bandwidth or cpu time somewhere.
How big is one tx in xcn?
Testing the limit shouldn't be that hard, actually. "Just" set up two computers and run a bash script to operate the wallet per RPC calls to do 1000/2000/... transactions per second to the other PC.
I've always wanted to do it but simply don't have the time unfortunately ...
And with regards to exchanges: XCN can still be traded on bisq... I just wouldn't trade it against BTC because of BTC tx fees. But LTC or I think doge is available, too.
March 05, 2018, 05:46:35 PM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
But as I understand, if you want to send hacked coins to the wallet it won't accept it, yes?
So maybe you should do a coin swap to new blockchain with rebranding?
Anybody, who would be interested would migrate and swap coins, and old chain would remain, but undeveloped.
March 05, 2018, 05:01:13 PM
If we want to be certain that no hacked coins are in circulation, we must make a new coin, but the old one will stay nonetheless.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
The rebranding is good for marketing, but it won't change anything in that regard.
March 05, 2018, 03:46:32 PM
this wallets have 400 million balance together more than total supply. so it's because of hacked coin? blockchain accepts those hacked coin but can't count them in total supply?
Yes and yes.
We can't freeze those funds as they mostly belong to honest exchange users and, without the exchange support, we can't tell how many coins are still in the hacker hands.
I think we need another start. our situation getting worse and worse polo delist us btc38 delist us bter and ax too. CSC coin did this and they make their marketcap 100 times more.
March 05, 2018, 03:05:56 PM
this wallets have 400 million balance together more than total supply. so it's because of hacked coin? blockchain accepts those hacked coin but can't count them in total supply?
Yes and yes.
We can't freeze those funds as they mostly belong to honest exchange users and, without the exchange support, we can't tell how many coins are still in the hacker hands.
March 05, 2018, 02:40:56 PM
CVPaxGgsteGgucAnzmA7EeTj5hzaLCfb7o 272686452
CHrbKoNhiSWAa4jNknhUEndgf1xmEhHrLN 36009349
CJsLjwQqrCM9FrnNe5eg1FrV1t7oL1sMia 1818078
CQA9yhrGjQXbNoh95W5gKwNKjHzFb4zZXF 4239508
CaHS3z5JMMoEtKArKjqgboB7JZkAknuWJu 2860625
CSRNeps76NDJDWxbmcxVZrwQ1S97c9WkKu 8029555
CNWH3Nek7mXzzBtH5BSVrz1f3Kx9vP4Yqv 7028675
CTiTCcfDwneYLrr56HtbeJCqDfRSWSufJT 1000100
Ceq7hSRPQFps2crtd8cDCeuYanGZEeV8VW 9575056
CGzsGULf3v8cajDsBPWnxYNDnjGNGyij5Z 1072104
CPxoTrWbzLxoBWQdi2WocZDecqnX7sFZo3 1599999
CGaYRd8hYvQJ1xw2SnGzX8gJQWLDxvkUSk 1781348
CemTE1Gx3YUgL5Qzd1xMpmFQwT3ersvHAd 1246460
CQXNv3dUaXJJ5iAwsUQutDyxmSwN69u7oh 1320922
CVSSknrdxh1Eapt8Jmy3EYrvSTVj5a9czy 1571817
CRZjDdMdHad5fRaL2NyXRwnv18Gakch3ns 3744878
CKGuU8cjTphmVa9XoXEEf6FgR1KYVrX4zX 1344792
CJxiHhtsdzZMqNYCQy6G4vyNtFc54nCxD8 5601050
CHTEaXi3v6UhipUdMAaNRyRGDxJ7ReMimV 5000000
CPtF8uLFq4JSvURS2cqGXX9QNmpaytXuB2 201642
CS1BMFz7WQpx6Pf7kuTV4UwuwveFnqt3Ac 1133150
CexggGgR3eyKwjnZavHQvCAaAnwMksm5Ge 1076425
CUCmvitMFWB9HKguo6eYmj13e9WFfBM3Eh 1468414
CUkSw2CaDjuBUeYq3QHNgc8fu1RDWCxg32 994093
CRFNYPaztgRMV7UKuT2wA4jimqcAV8ptMu 722199
CczmKMd6LxVfddr4GkAcCEk242vxiCs3Lm 928777
CJWnxYC6bNEZcYpzGptHSAScBoVQjMtnUa 965250
CW1gpzekKi5CFBPEQPXJ3LAYFJTaCsw3Sx 4505540
Cf5Ye3QzztmdwR1PUARvNAG4mTtMYWw3S7 14692203
CSrRwzFgw59hHVRKYfRQyWXWVrMLCww4hZ 1744040
CTMVEw9ATu3Pvyb2Wo3D77GvdVSNWqfavU 2433578
this wallets have 400 million balance together more than total supply. so it's because of hacked coin? blockchain accepts those hacked coin but can't count them in total supply?
CHrbKoNhiSWAa4jNknhUEndgf1xmEhHrLN 36009349
CJsLjwQqrCM9FrnNe5eg1FrV1t7oL1sMia 1818078
CQA9yhrGjQXbNoh95W5gKwNKjHzFb4zZXF 4239508
CaHS3z5JMMoEtKArKjqgboB7JZkAknuWJu 2860625
CSRNeps76NDJDWxbmcxVZrwQ1S97c9WkKu 8029555
CNWH3Nek7mXzzBtH5BSVrz1f3Kx9vP4Yqv 7028675
CTiTCcfDwneYLrr56HtbeJCqDfRSWSufJT 1000100
Ceq7hSRPQFps2crtd8cDCeuYanGZEeV8VW 9575056
CGzsGULf3v8cajDsBPWnxYNDnjGNGyij5Z 1072104
CPxoTrWbzLxoBWQdi2WocZDecqnX7sFZo3 1599999
CGaYRd8hYvQJ1xw2SnGzX8gJQWLDxvkUSk 1781348
CemTE1Gx3YUgL5Qzd1xMpmFQwT3ersvHAd 1246460
CQXNv3dUaXJJ5iAwsUQutDyxmSwN69u7oh 1320922
CVSSknrdxh1Eapt8Jmy3EYrvSTVj5a9czy 1571817
CRZjDdMdHad5fRaL2NyXRwnv18Gakch3ns 3744878
CKGuU8cjTphmVa9XoXEEf6FgR1KYVrX4zX 1344792
CJxiHhtsdzZMqNYCQy6G4vyNtFc54nCxD8 5601050
CHTEaXi3v6UhipUdMAaNRyRGDxJ7ReMimV 5000000
CPtF8uLFq4JSvURS2cqGXX9QNmpaytXuB2 201642
CS1BMFz7WQpx6Pf7kuTV4UwuwveFnqt3Ac 1133150
CexggGgR3eyKwjnZavHQvCAaAnwMksm5Ge 1076425
CUCmvitMFWB9HKguo6eYmj13e9WFfBM3Eh 1468414
CUkSw2CaDjuBUeYq3QHNgc8fu1RDWCxg32 994093
CRFNYPaztgRMV7UKuT2wA4jimqcAV8ptMu 722199
CczmKMd6LxVfddr4GkAcCEk242vxiCs3Lm 928777
CJWnxYC6bNEZcYpzGptHSAScBoVQjMtnUa 965250
CW1gpzekKi5CFBPEQPXJ3LAYFJTaCsw3Sx 4505540
Cf5Ye3QzztmdwR1PUARvNAG4mTtMYWw3S7 14692203
CSrRwzFgw59hHVRKYfRQyWXWVrMLCww4hZ 1744040
CTMVEw9ATu3Pvyb2Wo3D77GvdVSNWqfavU 2433578
this wallets have 400 million balance together more than total supply. so it's because of hacked coin? blockchain accepts those hacked coin but can't count them in total supply?
March 05, 2018, 02:18:55 PM
Thanks e6ug! I will link the page as soon as I get to my pc.
We were thinking of setting up a little contest about the additional graphics. What do you guys think? We still have some xcn funds to use for anything (exchanges need a lot more anyways).
We were thinking of setting up a little contest about the additional graphics. What do you guys think? We still have some xcn funds to use for anything (exchanges need a lot more anyways).
March 05, 2018, 01:48:55 PM
Hello Cryptonite fans
I have made a XCN Facebook Page, if you could take a moment to hit the like button that would be awesome! https://www.facebook.com/XCN.mini.blockchain/
If you all would like, I can make a Group for mining,development, and general discussion and link it to the page. I know most of you are too cool for Facebook but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience.
but believe it or not Facebook has a HUGE crypto audience. also for you creative members of the Cryptonite community, we could really use some fresh graphics!
March 05, 2018, 12:51:35 PM
just to let you guys know, i was able to withdraw my XCN from AEX. trading isn't possible there anymore...
March 05, 2018, 04:33:05 AM
I was having the same idea, and we were even discussing possibilities, on slack, just idea have died, due to my lack of time, and that one such exchange - freiexchange, is honest, and seem to welcome hosting old alts.
But I'm interested in what you are doing, so maybe we can create some group on slack, or telegram.
But I'm interested in what you are doing, so maybe we can create some group on slack, or telegram.
Jump to: