Even if we could divide the faucet amount down there's still the situation that people who pay others to click for them will get >95% of everything that comes out of it which is why I'm very confused why this is such a popular wish.
Because some of them are naive and don't understand this problem, and the others are waiting to exploit it as you wrote
How is that materially different from people who can pay to buy them getting the majority?
If you want to get some BTC for your work then I have absolutely no problem with that, but if its about fairness or amount of time required to run the faucet I really don't understand why its an issue at all. The time requirement because of people posting questions was only because it was never made clear exactly how it worked.
that is the problem.
How is possible to control the market if you play god of fairness. you distributed out with recaptcha and then it is freedom of ppl hold or dump.
recaptcha is most fair way indeed. the coin is getting popular, and more ppl will come and collect.
why dev is not raising the problem when only few ppl collecting most of coins in early days. but now?
if you really need fairness, there is many other ways far better than bid auction.
how can we call bid auction is fairness?
if bid auction is fairness. then ICO is almost 100 times better than "bid auction" fairness.
I hope i express myself well with my english.
