Author

Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 605. (Read 775172 times)

sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
There should be a way to block the BTCs that one puts into his bid; some kind of escrow that holds the bids i guess... if i were to be the highest bidder, i whould never pay, since 6 people are getting way better prices.

How can it happen especially there will be maybe hundreds bids in the last minutes?

I.E. Sending the btc to an escrow address is considered a bid; losing bids will be returned.


So noone can make 10 or 20 bids in the last minutes? Where is the aucation?
hero member
Activity: 705
Merit: 500
There should be a way to block the BTCs that one puts into his bid; some kind of escrow that holds the bids i guess... if i were to be the highest bidder, i whould never pay, since 6 people are getting way better prices.

How can it happen especially there will be maybe hundreds bids in the last minutes?

I.E. Sending the btc to an escrow address is considered a bid; losing bids will be returned.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
There should be a way to block the BTCs that one puts into his bid; some kind of escrow that holds the bids i guess... if i were to be the highest bidder, i whould never pay, since 6 people are getting way better prices.

How can it happen especially there will be maybe hundreds bids in the last minutes?
hero member
Activity: 705
Merit: 500
There should be a way to block the BTCs that one puts into his bid; some kind of escrow that holds the bids i guess... if i were to be the highest bidder, i whould never pay, since 6 people are getting way better prices.
hero member
Activity: 1016
Merit: 502
5 pages already written, wow ) I was just going to offer another method: some change difficulty like

a btc or another altcoin, any X hours or any X blocks, when be a smaller, or bigger on a captcha reward / time to reward.
hero member
Activity: 595
Merit: 500
non può fare dump per sempre
lol now is a 100% premined coin dumped on the market by the dev


congrats  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250


even in fair condition is not an easy way for people to get this coin you will change them of clicking the captchas for waiting stick to the computer screen to the last minutes of the daily auction to offer a bid 1sat higher than the other guys

very true i don't think i looked too deeply into the mechanics of auctioning especially in the google group format or the ebay style rush 10 minutes before every auction .

I did suggest the auction get cancelled/put on hold for the moment since that is the only almost unanimous decision the community i think would agree on by a big majority

And what about all those captcha-miner, and slave recruiter who are upset with the decision, I mean how difficult would be for them to hijack the auction every day, how about create 7 gmail accounts and place exorbitant bid just to piss off the DEV, it is childish but I'm sure that somebody with plenty of time to solve captchas will have plenty of time to do something like that

You are pointing really good parts of situations which can be happened in the future. Thanks.
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250


even in fair condition is not an easy way for people to get this coin you will change them of clicking the captchas for waiting stick to the computer screen to the last minutes of the daily auction to offer a bid 1sat higher than the other guys

very true i don't think i looked too deeply into the mechanics of auctioning especially in the google group format or the ebay style rush 10 minutes before every auction .

I did suggest the auction get cancelled/put on hold for the moment since that is the only almost unanimous decision the community i think would agree on by a big majority

And what about all those captcha-miner, and slave recruiter who are upset with the decision, I mean how difficult would be for them to hijack the auction every day, how about create 7 gmail accounts and place exorbitant bid just to piss off the DEV, it is childish but I'm sure that somebody with plenty of time to solve captchas will have plenty of time to do something like that
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


even in fair condition is not an easy way for people to get this coin you will change them of clicking the captchas for waiting stick to the computer screen to the last minutes of the daily auction to offer a bid 1sat higher than the other guys

very true i don't think i looked too deeply into the mechanics of auctioning especially in the google group format or the ebay style rush 10 minutes before every auction .

I did suggest the auction get cancelled/put on hold for the moment since that is the only almost unanimous decision the community i think would agree on by a big majority
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?


I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .



come on how hard is to create a couple of gmail account and push the bids up? how hard would be to someone with enough money to buy all the coins for a week put high bids the next one and sell all his coins on a secondary market and then magically erase the bid on the forum? that kind of price manipulation is what I'm talking, and all this behind the transparency of a google forum

you have a good point , i was focusing solely on the auction under fair conditions but you are right it can be very very easily manipulated

even in fair condition is not an easy way for people to get this coin you will change them of clicking the captchas for waiting stick to the computer screen to the last minutes of the daily auction to offer a bid 1sat higher than the other guys
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?


I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .



come on how hard is to create a couple of gmail account and push the bids up? how hard would be to someone with enough money to buy all the coins for a week put high bids the next one and sell all his coins on a secondary market and then magically erase the bid on the forum? that kind of price manipulation is what I'm talking, and all this behind the transparency of a google forum

you have a good point , i was focusing solely on the auction under fair conditions but you are right it can be very very easily manipulated
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
"shh, he's coding..."
IMHO, These auctions likes a dump in exchange by dev
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?


I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .



come on how hard is to create a couple of gmail account and push the bids up? how hard would be to someone with enough money to buy all the coins for a week put high bids the next one and sell all his coins on a secondary market and then magically erase the bid on the forum? that kind of price manipulation is what I'm talking, and all this behind the transparency of a google forum
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 250
Fair Distribution = Shut up and give me your fucking btc.  Grin Grin Grin

Free faucet distribution has turned into: "how much are you willing to pay? More you pay, more chance to grab mrai"
So fair.....
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?

I am not condoning auctioning but it wouldn't always be the same 7 people buying the blocks , it would be 7 blocks a week and would likely of ended up more diluted and shared more than if faucet remained the way it was going .

legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
"shh, he's coding..."
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding

so he decided to monopolize the coin so that he get daily profit and leave the control of the coin to the 7 guys with more money. I just don't understand how that fit in an equal distribution?
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?

one of his main issues was  , the amount of time and effort that distracted him away from developing , it was a full time job just keeping the website and faucet functioning , then add onto that 50 angry faucet solvers complaining when the faucet dried out cos the daily amount in the faucet was claimed , i think it might of be an "ah fuck it moment"

he was spending all his time trying to do right by people , causing him not to be able to actually code for the coin and even then it was constant complaints , i think he choose it for the easy less trouble option , so he could get back to work coding
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 250
And what is the DEV position about this issue, in the first place he made the auction without asking anybody, and the only explanation he gave was that "some people found the captcha to complicated and that an auction was the simple way to distribute the coin, and the only difference was that the BTC were for him and not for captcha-miners"....is the same guy that wanted to distribute to the maximum number of people? that didn't wanted his coin to be monopolized? how an auction help a coin to not be monopolized, if it will just be on the hands of the guys with more economical power?
sr. member
Activity: 297
Merit: 250
reduce faucet rewards in 2-10 times less, and if at the end of the month/week/day plan for distribution won't be done go and sell in auction


I agree with reduce reward.. back to original distribution..

but.. Grin
Jump to: