Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments - page 85. (Read 775154 times)

sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
Good afternoon. Need help with the NANO transaction. Sent NANO from Kucoin exchange to Binace they did not come. How can I be helped?

https://raiblocks.net/block/index.php?h=B05AD0867B24E428A8291F624D5D5D2C96C57B797D471521E31EDE05C680CA2D


please contact Binance support
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
Apr 7
https://medium.com/@nanocurrency/upcoming-transition-to-universal-blocks-cbbaca58e466

Quote
Upcoming Transition to Universal Blocks
The release of Nano Node version 11 included support for Universal Blocks to be turned on via a “canary block”. In preparation for the canary block, the Core team asks all users operating default Nano nodes to upgrade to version 11. In certain cases where developers are using block_create, the block type will need to be changed from the existing four block types to state_block. If users have any questions please contact us in the #support channel on our official discord server.

Version 11.2 can be found here or can be run using our official Docker repo at nanocurrency/nano.

The current timeline for the canary block to be launched is on April 12th, 2018.

How the Nano Protocol is Upgraded
Nano, like any other cryptocurrency, is a protocol, an agreed upon standard that allows computers to communicate with each other and agree on data.

Bitcoin uses a blockchain as its public ledger database. By design, the blockchain is synchronous, where batches of transactions are appended to the Bitcoin blockchain in blocks that the entire network agrees on. Data (transactions) can only be added to the blockchain in discrete steps.

Nano uses a block-lattice, a directed acyclic graph (DAG), as it’s public ledger database. By design, the Nano block-lattice is asynchronous, where transactions can be added independent of other transactions occurring on the network.

All nodes on a cryptocurrency network upgrading their protocol at the same time is crucial to the consensus and consistency in the network. Blockchains accomplish this by programming into the node software an upgrade block-height. At the x’th block in the blockchain, all nodes utilizing the new software will switch over from the old protocol to the upgraded protocol.

Since Nano doesn’t have an exact blockheight that all nodes can agree upon, we need a different signaling method for all nodes to simultaneously upgrade their protocol.

The method we use is to send out a canary transaction. A canary transaction is no different than any other send/receive/change/open transaction; for the sake of this article, lets assume that the canary block is a 0 Nano send from a certain account chain in control by Nano Core to itself. This transaction is already formed and stored away, unbroadcasted, and waiting to be utilized. All nodes that are running the upgraded software will be listening for the hash, the digital fingerprint, of this block as the signal to switch on the upgraded protocol.

During the upcoming days the Core team will give more details on the upgrade and will be available to answer any questions on Reddit or Discord. Thank you for your continued support!
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
It has been few months since the rebranding took place but the title of the thread remained unchanged. Although OP isn't active on daily basis but periodically he appears on forum. I will suggest to edit the title and along with old a few words about Nano can be added for wider awareness for new people to have access to project without efforts.


sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 256
It has been few months since the rebranding took place but the title of the thread remained unchanged. Although OP isn't active on daily basis but periodically he appears on forum. I will suggest to edit the title and along with old a few words about Nano can be added for wider awareness for new people to have access to project without efforts.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Good afternoon. Need help with the NANO transaction. Sent NANO from Kucoin exchange to Binace they did not come. How can I be helped?

https://raiblocks.net/block/index.php?h=B05AD0867B24E428A8291F624D5D5D2C96C57B797D471521E31EDE05C680CA2D
sr. member
Activity: 510
Merit: 260

The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?

Thank you for your answer.

I have done:
Code:
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT

But it is the same Sad


Sad That sucks. Last option would be to check your ip6tables for rules and to also tcpdump the packets to see where they're goin.



Good idea ip6tables ! but does not work either. :-(

Fun that nobody seems running a node on Ubuntu with a firewall Wink

I have the feeling (but not enough skills to solve) it due to the way the ports are handled with UDP (it reminds me the trouble you may have will firewall and ftp).

Code:
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT

/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT

/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT

/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ip6tables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT


Does not solve the problem
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0

The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?

Thank you for your answer.

I have done:
Code:
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT

But it is the same Sad


Sad That sucks. Last option would be to check your ip6tables for rules and to also tcpdump the packets to see where they're goin.

member
Activity: 308
Merit: 13
ZetoChain - ACCELERATING BLOCKCHAIN FOR THE SUPPLY
This is fact when price of any legit project are falling people don't touch it. We will see lot of people shouting moon and showing interest in buying when the price will start to increase again. If project is real and development is going on through thick and thick situations means buying time is at low. Nano works smoothly who has used it knows well.

That's how it is. Most people are just here for the moons and lambos and not for the technology. They're better off chasing vaporwares and shilling them to unsuspecting community noobs than supporting projects who makes the difference. Nano is a top project bur everyone is after a 10x or 20x ico project with little to no development in place.



it´s always like that. And most Fudder just joined the project at ATH and now are in a loss. that´s not the Projects fault
sr. member
Activity: 510
Merit: 260

The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?

Thank you for your answer.

I have done:
Code:
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 7075 -j ACCEPT

But it is the same Sad
full member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 123
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
This is fact when price of any legit project are falling people don't touch it. We will see lot of people shouting moon and showing interest in buying when the price will start to increase again. If project is real and development is going on through thick and thick situations means buying time is at low. Nano works smoothly who has used it knows well.

That's how it is. Most people are just here for the moons and lambos and not for the technology. They're better off chasing vaporwares and shilling them to unsuspecting community noobs than supporting projects who makes the difference. Nano is a top project bur everyone is after a 10x or 20x ico project with little to no development in place.

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 254
This is fact when price of any legit project are falling people don't touch it. We will see lot of people shouting moon and showing interest in buying when the price will start to increase again. If project is real and development is going on through thick and thick situations means buying time is at low. Nano works smoothly who has used it knows well.

Well the most clever ones will always get involved prior every hype. The projects works well and everyone will realize that

I couldn't agree more with what you said here, clever ones usually get involved before every hype that's why at the end of the day they're usually the one's that's very profitable. I'm pretty sure now while the market is still bear, a lot of people are collecting some nanos, it may not seem obvious due to the current price of bitcoin but I'm sure there are a number of people buying at the current market. For me though nano's technology is revolutionary and the dev's just keeps on improving its technology. Looking at the charts I have a good feeling that nano's price might skyrocket once this bear market ends.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Hi there,

Newby question, please. I have installed a headless node on an Ubuntu 16.04
At node start I have 4 errors strings:
"sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted
sendto: Operation not permitted"


I have opened UDP port for peering in the firewall with no result:
#nano In/Out
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT

What am I missing? Thank you.

Are you directing packets to a table called filter? Any other rules you have got in place?

Maybe try this instead:

Code:
/sbin/iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -I OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT

Yes, it is part of a larger firewall script where I close "everything" then re-open one by one each port I need (I have others software running on this server). Here is the beginning of the script:
Code:
#!/bin/sh

# Empty rules
/sbin/iptables -t filter -F

# Empty personnal rule
/sbin/iptables -t filter -X

# Forbid everything
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P INPUT DROP
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P FORWARD DROP
/sbin/iptables -t filter -P OUTPUT DROP

# Preserve established connexion
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

# Allow loopback
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT

Then I open the ports I need according to https://github.com/nanocurrency/raiblocks/wiki/Network-usage

Code:
#nano In/Out
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p udp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7075 -j ACCEPT

The -t filter comes from the way the script starts and does works well will all other programs, I have been using this script for years. I suspect this is related to the UDP nature of the protocol but I have no idea.

Anyone out there has an iptable working script on Ubuntu ?

I also have in my logs:
Code:
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.686591]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:138.68.183.123]:1964: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687108]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:51.255.200.174]:6063: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687115]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:5.189.128.113]:12000: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687160]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:186.155.30.146]:52921: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687176]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:167.99.254.89]:1024: Operation not permitted
[2018-04-04 12:14:39.687257]: Error broadcasting confirm_ack to [::ffff:186.155.30.146]:62212: Operation not permitted


The output ports seems to be non-7075, maybe try using sport 7075 instead?
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 13
ZetoChain - ACCELERATING BLOCKCHAIN FOR THE SUPPLY
This is fact when price of any legit project are falling people don't touch it. We will see lot of people shouting moon and showing interest in buying when the price will start to increase again. If project is real and development is going on through thick and thick situations means buying time is at low. Nano works smoothly who has used it knows well.

Well the most clever ones will always get involved prior every hype. The projects works well and everyone will realize that
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 250
This is fact when price of any legit project are falling people don't touch it. We will see lot of people shouting moon and showing interest in buying when the price will start to increase again. If project is real and development is going on through thick and thick situations means buying time is at low. Nano works smoothly who has used it knows well.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
t is nice to see Nano is recovering and it is now holding 18 place in coinmarketcap,but with fairly good prospects to get in top 15 soon.Some of the price increase is for sure due to BTC price increase,but even when BTC price was under 10k$ Nano is showing ascending path.
It can also be bull trap initiated by hacker/s conected with BitGrail incident,but maybe he/she just sold everything he/she had.Price is just crossed 16$ and if BitGrail did not happen I have no doubt that price would be close to 30$ or even more.




That is not going to happen anymore. Nano is considered a Scam coin within more than 1000 currencies that do not have a solid base of exchange currently. Bitcoin still remain thanks to Japan and South Korea. Nano has died as hard currency and will never exceed 10 dollars. It also runs the risk of this coin falling into an empty can and completely losing its value very quickly. Here, the only one who has become a millionaire with Nano is the criminal and owner of Bitgrail, I can not believe how the Italian justice has not yet closed that trading platform and he should be in jail. Nano, originally was a project with some consistency, but being a currency with "0" cost and not having incentives of profits of intermediaries and not needing mining, I doubt that it can be taken into account in the future. It's just my opinion and maybe I'm wrong, but maybe, I'm right. Greetings.

Bro how can you call Nano a Scam? It has been in the field for almost 4 years and yet it is rising. Nano has been great and if you are visiting reddit you will be amazed by how many merchants are using it because of its speed and no fee transactions. Incidents always happen and Bitgrail is so bad, but we must accept it because other coins like bitcoin and ethereum experienced those things and we learned from it.

Don't worry mate, it's just another newbie talking FUD about nano that's not new on this thread ever since the bitgrail scam happened, all of those who got their nano stolen went rogue and just talk inappropriately about nano. Don't worry though the OGS and those who strongly believed about nano knows the strength behind the technology of nano. I've seen a lot of posts on reddit regarding online merchants using nano and so far they seem to really like the performance of nano and they seem to really enjoy the perks that it has when they incorporate it. This just means that nano is definitely ready to be used by online merchants globally, I just hope within this year nano can be utilized by huge number of online shops. Yeah things like the bitgrail scam happen but it only happens to strong coins like nano, if bitcoin and ethereum skyrocketed after what happened then there's a huge possibility that nano can follow that trend.

Just check Guaresneider's post history its an account made to post about XRB / NANO and his story changes every couple of weeks he makes statements and then contradicts his own statements a few weeks after pretending it was other people that said those things , hes a joke , he has been on my Ignore list for awhile.

Created ---January 02, 2018, 06:16:18 AM--- only posts here just someone trying to get attention i suggest u put him on ignore like i did.


Honestly it's the firs time that I've encountered this guy, lol never really thought he'll be so butt hurt about what I said hahahaha I guess I hit a nerve well just like what the popular saying says the truth hurts lmao anyway thank you for teaching me about the ignore list mate, I've been on here for almost a year now but it's the first time that I used this feature. I also just check his post history and you're right he is indeed a joke, looking at his posts it really seems like he just created his account to talk bad about Nano well too bad for him, he can never put a great project down. I don't want to sound too full of myself but I was right he's just another newbie spreading FUD lol.



hahahahaha.... Cheesy
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Been trying to use the NANO Wallet on Windows.

It's the worst Crypto wallet I ever used.

Chaotic.

I was interested into NANO but this clearly isn't good enough for adoption.

Plus, NANO rebranding was a mistake. "NANO" on Google gives millions of other results and XRB Raiblocks still gives way more intel than NANO.
Fail...


 Shocked Shocked
Its chaotic and Nano goes to the hole of oblivion as currency. There are many here who believe themselves part of the group of the Illuminati but brain has more Homer Simpson than some of those who "believe" here. They smoke too much of the green because they are nervous knowing that Nano is going to disaster for sure. It will not reach the $ 20 nor for the 2140 date that is supposed to limit for the Bitcoin. Friends of Bitgrail, keep dreaming of Raiblocks, but in a nutshell make a wallet for poor Christians who do not know what to do with their coins ....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

A kiss to the Illuminati of themathiasmillerac...
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 251
Developer Update- 4/4/18
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/89rggp/developer_update_4418/

Quote
It has been a little bit over a week since version 11 of the Nano Node was released. Currently, around 45% of the network has been upgraded and is running the latest version.

We’ve been monitoring its rollout and working diligently with those reporting issues to diagnose, understand, test and patch bugs that were found. Our team would like to thank all users who have reported any issues they have faced to us, this engagement helps immensely to refine the Nano protocol.

Version 11 – patches and learnings

In version 11.2, found at https://github.com/nanocurrency/raiblocks/releases/tag/V11.2, we have fixed an issue where a cached value was being ignored and when recalculated would cause the node to crash.

Also, work generation was moved outside of database transactions, which could cause large database sizes if work generation was very slow or there were a lot of wallet operations.

Universal Blocks were not the cause of any of these nor was their future rollout via canary block affected.

Exchange questions

Exchanges running nodes are a unique situation due to the scale at which they operate. Our team is available 24/7 to answer any technical questions exchanges may have and to offer full support in resolving any issues they are facing. When a problem arises and it is brought to our attention, our team dedicates full resources to solve the issue as quickly as possible.

Two things to keep in mind:

1) Due to the nature of some questions or issues that arise that are internal to the exchanges’ business or sensitive in their nature, we do not feel it is appropriate to comment on the issues they are facing and we feel it is best to let exchanges to provide updates as they see fit.

2) Many coins that are forks of bitcoin or are ERC-20 tokens have a standard API and integration that exchanges are very familiar with. Because Nano is not a derivative project, our node and API are unique and may experience issues that other coins’ nodes do not.

As a final note, our team would like to extend our thanks to the Binance team for their professionalism, time and dedication in resolving the wallet issues we recently faced. Our team was able to diagnose their problem and get a fix in place, resulting in minimal downtime.
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
Will follow this project for more info... Good luck !
newbie
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
Today we’re releasing version 11 which includes Universal Blocks. Let us know how it goes! https://t.co/02FhDYga7u
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
The no-fee feature is going to revolutionize the industry of crypto!
Pages:
Jump to: