hahaha!!
Topic: [ANN][XST] Stealth-Coin.com | Tor | StealthText, World's first anonymous SMS Tx! - page 61. (Read 748616 times)
October 09, 2014, 11:05:06 PM
October 09, 2014, 10:43:39 PM
October 09, 2014, 10:34:24 PM
Your spaming over the truth shows how nervous you are as an investor....Not to mention everything stated in the above post is total bullshit and cant be further from the truth!!! Yea you really no crypto.......
Your a joke emilioman
Your a joke emilioman
Youre a joke noob, pookie.
obviously you not was a BCT member yet when liberty was launched and should not know about cryptocoins that time.
I think you showed your flawed charts in forex that time
No other "anon" coin existed beyond darkcoin when liberty was launched.
I mined liberty since day one and bought 600k for 200 satoshis.
Two weeks later she come to be worth more than 20k and then was destroyed by IE and its stupid dev.
liberty had more than 1500 btc volume on mintpal for a week
I sell at 18k
October 09, 2014, 10:11:01 PM
So, can you point out to me where you are getting the information that it can't be done?
What, are you insane? Don't confuse the issue with facts.
Apparently I am since I forgot that Chandran sigs are in fact "Sub-linear Ring Signatures Without Random Oracles" and I found a paper that shows how to make them traceable etc. Not to mention a few papers that offer improvements and/or alternative methods to that paper. lol
October 09, 2014, 10:05:31 PM
So, can you point out to me where you are getting the information that it can't be done?
What, are you insane? Don't confuse the issue with facts.
October 09, 2014, 09:57:05 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
It seems like only logical people think the same thing i have come to conclusion it is vaporwaer because of the bashing and the way ive been treated you saw what i asked to begin with and what followed your points are bang on correct now with regards to my claims its simple. Regular ring signatures cannot be used because double spending is untraceable as they are unlinkable. no one is able to find out wether any two signatures (with two spends) are generated by the same entity or not. Linkable ring signatures provide the remedy to this problem by allowing the public to detect any signer who has produced two or more signatures. Hondo does not know how to pick the right paper the tracability is needed to to prevent double spending and chandran are unlinkable/tracable The way its implied is vaporware!
Allrighty. So I found this which, if I'm understanding all the technical talk (and there's a good chance I'm not), says that you can make them traceable etc. Given that's from 2011, there's probably been some advancements since then
http://books.google.com/books?isbn=3642190731
In particular, section 5 and section 6.
Perhaps the devs could comment on that.
There also seems to be a paper out there "Sub-linear size traceable ring signatures without random oracles" which I can't seem to find the complete text to. However, I've found references in other documents that theorize improvements or alternatives to it that makes it appear to apply to Chandran signatures. One of it's authors is Eiichiro Fujisaki. Interestingly, I found a post that said something along the lines of the CN method being "inspired" by that paper.
So, can you point out to me where you are getting the information that it can't be done?
October 09, 2014, 09:56:47 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
Not an unreasonable request, but you should similarly see that it's not unreasonable to ignore the request. For example, in the early days of XC, which despite its other failings has seen many technical successes, Dan answered technical questions in the thread all the time. Then he clearly realized that was a massive drain on his time and not worth it as for every intelligent and well meaning technical question he had to wade through a pile of worthless troll questions. Parallel here is that while your question is reasonable, does the dev really need to take his time to deal with longandshort, who doesn't have an argument and just shouts that he doesn't think the project will work? So maybe dev decides he'd rather just focus on coding rather than putting himself at the beck and call of Random People On The Internet and answers neither question.
Quite an interesting take on the actions of someone you are not, so you are saying that everyone else that has asked anything here that has not revived a mature answer is not worthy because they are "some random from the internet" You do realise we are all random and are all on the Internet don't you? no clearly not with a stupid idea such as that..so because i asked a simple question and got bashed and have been asking it ever since im not worthy because i wont give up..cmon you have lost the plot! and are quite offensive. you would not put up with this bs so why should any body else! that is whats lost to me! how you justify it is scary! this is plain and simple about my sig and the claims i present nothing more nothing less you people cant answer and you handle it by swinging an axe. primitive to say the least!
Look - my point is if I fire off an email to elon musk asking that he defend this or that about the model d, he's not going to answer me. He doesn't know who I am, and it isn't efficient for him to spend time answering technical questions just because Someone Wants To Know. This is a similar, albeit lesser, scenario. Maybe for your own reference go through a16z's portfolio and start firing off technical questions to various founders. Most will not bother to respond to you, and that does NOT mean there is anything wrong with their respective businesses. It just means they don't value your opinion enough to respond to you... Make sense?
And by the way, you probably can get an answer to the question you are asking, just not by repeatedly spamming this thread with crap. Try PM, try slackchat.
October 09, 2014, 09:49:00 PM
Long and short, have you gone into slackchat and spoken with the devs?
I don't use slackchat should i..this is a community question i really wasn't asking the devs but encouraging your community to look at the glaring facts..something you are all still well incapable of doing bar a few that don't seem to be holding it! funny that isn't it! if i was invested both time and money i would be asking a lot more then this maybe you should be too! and don't start on me twisting it up to suit you i don't have to do anything other then what i'm doing right now you are all making a perfect example for everyone to see of how not to handle things!
Got it, you're more into making a show and causing a reaction than you are into actually finding the answer to your question. Thanks.
October 09, 2014, 09:47:09 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
Not an unreasonable request, but you should similarly see that it's not unreasonable to ignore the request. For example, in the early days of XC, which despite its other failings has seen many technical successes, Dan answered technical questions in the thread all the time. Then he clearly realized that was a massive drain on his time and not worth it as for every intelligent and well meaning technical question he had to wade through a pile of worthless troll questions. Parallel here is that while your question is reasonable, does the dev really need to take his time to deal with longandshort, who doesn't have an argument and just shouts that he doesn't think the project will work? So maybe dev decides he'd rather just focus on coding rather than putting himself at the beck and call of Random People On The Internet and answers neither question.
Yeah. The devs are keeping busy, but they do respond to genuine questions here. And they're easy to get in contact with at slack chat.
Tonight argakiig gave me a sweet chicken recipe to seduce my woman.
Dev got me laid. Thanks, bro.
October 09, 2014, 09:45:34 PM
Long and short, have you gone into slackchat and spoken with the devs?
I don't use slackchat should i..this is a community question i really wasn't asking the devs but encouraging your community to look at the glaring facts..something you are all still well incapable of doing bar a few that don't seem to be holding it! funny that isn't it! if i was invested both time and money i would be asking a lot more then this maybe you should be too! and don't start on me twisting it up to suit you i don't have to do anything other then what i'm doing right now you are all making a perfect example for everyone to see of how not to handle things!
October 09, 2014, 09:41:57 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
Not an unreasonable request, but you should similarly see that it's not unreasonable to ignore the request. For example, in the early days of XC, which despite its other failings has seen many technical successes, Dan answered technical questions in the thread all the time. Then he clearly realized that was a massive drain on his time and not worth it as for every intelligent and well meaning technical question he had to wade through a pile of worthless troll questions. Parallel here is that while your question is reasonable, does the dev really need to take his time to deal with longandshort, who doesn't have an argument and just shouts that he doesn't think the project will work? So maybe dev decides he'd rather just focus on coding rather than putting himself at the beck and call of Random People On The Internet and answers neither question.
Quite an interesting take on the actions of someone you are not, so you are saying that everyone else that has asked anything here that has not revived a mature answer is not worthy because they are "some random from the internet" You do realise we are all random and are all on the Internet don't you? no clearly not with a stupid idea such as that..so because i asked a simple question and got bashed and have been asking it ever since im not worthy because i wont give up..cmon you have lost the plot! and are quite offensive. you would not put up with this bs so why should any body else! that is whats lost to me! how you justify it is scary! this is plain and simple about my sig and the claims i present nothing more nothing less you people cant answer and you handle it by swinging an axe. primitive to say the least!
October 09, 2014, 09:37:49 PM
Open Bazaar Update
Traders on underground “Dark” markets in the crypto-currency space face the constant risk of their marketplace of choice being shut down, and coins subsequently lost.
This risk is related to the centralization of these marketplaces. With this model, users face fees and regulations and must trust the platform itself. With abundant failed examples like Silk Road in the underground markets and Mt.Gox in the crypto-exchange sphere, it’s clear centralization is not the answer.
Fortunately, with peer-to-peer transactions made possible by cryptocurrencies, a truly decentralized platform is within reach.
Open Bazaar, an upcoming decentralized network for free commerce, is open-source and currently in beta. Sometime in December, we’re planning to launch our own iteration of Open Bazaar exclusive to StealthSend/StealthCoin.
Benefits of the Open Bazaar platform:
-Completely anonymous, if so desired (compatible with Tor and I2P)
-No fees
-”Reputation Pledges” based on proof-of-burn, a method by which crypto-currency is purposely destroyed to aid in establishing the one’s commitment to the platform.
-Trust Ratings
-Arbitration system & Ricardian Contracts Generator for special deals
-Encrypted messaging and chat
We’ve also been contacted about an upcoming article on one of the most prominent DarkNetMarkets media portals that will discuss StealthSend, and the future role of anonymous cryptocurrency in DarkNet marketplaces.
We look forward to serving our user’s interests in their privacy and their freedom to buy and sell goods online!
Traders on underground “Dark” markets in the crypto-currency space face the constant risk of their marketplace of choice being shut down, and coins subsequently lost.
This risk is related to the centralization of these marketplaces. With this model, users face fees and regulations and must trust the platform itself. With abundant failed examples like Silk Road in the underground markets and Mt.Gox in the crypto-exchange sphere, it’s clear centralization is not the answer.
Fortunately, with peer-to-peer transactions made possible by cryptocurrencies, a truly decentralized platform is within reach.
Open Bazaar, an upcoming decentralized network for free commerce, is open-source and currently in beta. Sometime in December, we’re planning to launch our own iteration of Open Bazaar exclusive to StealthSend/StealthCoin.
Benefits of the Open Bazaar platform:
-Completely anonymous, if so desired (compatible with Tor and I2P)
-No fees
-”Reputation Pledges” based on proof-of-burn, a method by which crypto-currency is purposely destroyed to aid in establishing the one’s commitment to the platform.
-Trust Ratings
-Arbitration system & Ricardian Contracts Generator for special deals
-Encrypted messaging and chat
We’ve also been contacted about an upcoming article on one of the most prominent DarkNetMarkets media portals that will discuss StealthSend, and the future role of anonymous cryptocurrency in DarkNet marketplaces.
We look forward to serving our user’s interests in their privacy and their freedom to buy and sell goods online!
October 09, 2014, 09:34:26 PM
Bob is posting in all threads he's in that he's on vacation for a couple weeks and that's he's coming back later. He has also done so here. If he was out he would be shitting all over Stealth, but he's not. Even then this is exactly how everyone was acting early September in the LXC thread and they dropped to 3k. Now they're sitting at 15k after almost cracking 20k. Took less than a month. I'm setting low buys and holding. I'm patient. That's me. That's what I'm doing.
THIS ^
October 09, 2014, 09:33:58 PM
Long and short, have you gone into slackchat and spoken with the devs?
October 09, 2014, 09:32:08 PM
Bob is posting in all threads he's in that he's on vacation for a couple weeks and that's he's coming back later. He has also done so here. If he was out he would be shitting all over Stealth, but he's not. Even then this is exactly how everyone was acting early September in the LXC thread and they dropped to 3k. Now they're sitting at 15k after almost cracking 20k. Took less than a month. I'm setting low buys and holding. I'm patient. That's me. That's what I'm doing.
October 09, 2014, 09:24:34 PM
Buy support doesn't matter right now, because noone will sell acceptable amount of XST for a price below 20k-30k 
Stealthcoin cap in the end of November about 10-15mlns, you must be real idiot to sell now, lol
Stealthcoin cap in the end of November about 10-15mlns, you must be real idiot to sell now, lol
October 09, 2014, 09:24:01 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
It's really hard for the devs to find legitimate questions behind all of the bullshit that this guy has been spouting off. He is a fucking headache.
The devs are on slack chat so, I will mention something for them to check out your questions. Or you can pm them - they respond to those, too. Try that - they're pretty cool people and have been very responsive to the community.
what a load of garbage i have been saying the same thing in about 100 different ways and the community says the same old crap just like you are saying!! don't take some moral high road im trying to get to the bottom of something we all want to know and you all want to hide!
October 09, 2014, 09:13:29 PM
@Pookie, are you a girl? Your name seems like a little pony name. Worry about buy wall of your shadowcoin that is pathetic. No volume. No blockchain. No friends
@Longandshort
What kind of dev are you?
Besides getting the threads of other coins spreading fud and trolling, you also send pm to investors of these other coins asking for them to buy sdc, as a desperate beggar.
You are part of dev team from a scamcoin that take the ideas of others and simply rushes to launch before and say it was the first without giving any credit to other and then begin with fud on another thread to try destroy another coin.
You guys did it with the mobile wallet with stake from librexcoin and now with a html 5 wallet from i/o coin and also are here just to try to discover how implement chandran signatures to launch it before stealthcoin too.
"Shadow knowing of the release of the wallet, ninja released the night before a QT5 based wallet running html5. IO COin was built from the ground up on RPC-only daemon. Meaning innovation something that had not been done before"
"I/OCoin is the first 100% HTML5 desktop wallet. John, click the about tab on that wallet and post here what it says. You will find it says QT. I rest my case
. See post #979 here – https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.960 The person in the shadowcon “self moderated thread” (the easiest way to know if the coin is ‘shady and scamy’ is to simply check if it is a Self Moderated thread, so they can hide the truth) Quote” it is a QT based desktop wallet with a front HTML5 UI” Clearly saying it is not a a html5 wallet."
http://www.coinssource.com/io-coin-design-meets-function-html5-wallet-pos-3-0/
THE HTML5 WALLET FROM SHADOWCOIN IS FAKE! JUST MAKE UP!
[/b]
@Longandshort
What kind of dev are you?
Besides getting the threads of other coins spreading fud and trolling, you also send pm to investors of these other coins asking for them to buy sdc, as a desperate beggar.
You are part of dev team from a scamcoin that take the ideas of others and simply rushes to launch before and say it was the first without giving any credit to other and then begin with fud on another thread to try destroy another coin.
You guys did it with the mobile wallet with stake from librexcoin and now with a html 5 wallet from i/o coin and also are here just to try to discover how implement chandran signatures to launch it before stealthcoin too.
"Shadow knowing of the release of the wallet, ninja released the night before a QT5 based wallet running html5. IO COin was built from the ground up on RPC-only daemon. Meaning innovation something that had not been done before"
"I/OCoin is the first 100% HTML5 desktop wallet. John, click the about tab on that wallet and post here what it says. You will find it says QT. I rest my case
. See post #979 here – https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.960 The person in the shadowcon “self moderated thread” (the easiest way to know if the coin is ‘shady and scamy’ is to simply check if it is a Self Moderated thread, so they can hide the truth) Quote” it is a QT based desktop wallet with a front HTML5 UI” Clearly saying it is not a a html5 wallet."
http://www.coinssource.com/io-coin-design-meets-function-html5-wallet-pos-3-0/
THE HTML5 WALLET FROM SHADOWCOIN IS FAKE! JUST MAKE UP!
[/b]
October 09, 2014, 09:11:05 PM
As we have stated many times, this team does not respond to trolling or misleading accusations.
If anyone from the community has any valid questions that are not framed in an accusatory tone, please feel free to post them and someone from the team will respond to them as we have every reasonable question in the past.
If anyone from the community has any valid questions that are not framed in an accusatory tone, please feel free to post them and someone from the team will respond to them as we have every reasonable question in the past.
+1
they are trying to force Hondo to explain how to implement Chandran signatures, so they can do the same in shitco ... sorry, shadowcoin.
October 09, 2014, 09:09:53 PM
The devs not responding to these comments (and they do know this is going on) just further demonstrates how little credibility this guy has.
I'll be blunt. The devs not responding is not a good thing. Look at how many pages have been filled with this stuff. There are many of us that want to hear real technical answers to things and don't get them. For example, I want to know what the size of the transactions will be with low mixes compared to CN coins as opposed to those given in the whitepaper as a selling point for chandran sigs. When I brought it up before, I was labeled a troll/fuder etc and got no answers.
When I asked real question about BTCD, jl777 answered me. When I asked questions about SDC, the dev answered me. Fact is, I could list a few more coins where the dev actually answered my questions but in here, all you get is posts about how this is the second coming and posts get buried with images.
Granted, unlike this guy, I didn't go into those other threads and come out saying it was crap and vaporware, but still, some of us would like some real technical discussions and when we don't see any, it does not reflect well on the coin and the devs.
It's really hard for the devs to find legitimate questions behind all of the bullshit that this guy has been spouting off. He is a fucking headache.
The devs are on slack chat so, I will mention something for them to check out your questions. Or you can pm them - they respond to those, too. Try that - they're pretty cool people and have been very responsive to the community.
Jump to: