http://www.ebay.com/itm/400-Watt-9-15-DC-Volts-Adjustable-36-Amp-Power-Supply-Real-USA-MegaWatt-/180777051248?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a1726e470
problem is its rated at 30A for a 100% duty cycle (like bitcoin mining is) so the S5 would pull more power than is available for most voltages. Bitmain says that 10A+ will be sufficient for 9V but i imagine that only applies to a single blade
12v/14 chips = 0.86V (stock is 0.8V?)
10v/14 chips = 0.71V or ~0.34w/GH or ~780Gh = 265W (26.5 A)
9v/14 chips = 0.64V or ~0.26w/GH or ~560Gh = 145.6W (16 A)
plus, at 9V draw, the linked power supply is likely <~85% efficient so youll be drawing more power at the wall
I advise no one to try it if they do not have the psu in hand. If I recall the 2 psu's I found are only 80% so savings are not much power wise. 9/12 volts is 75 percent less but an 80 percent power supply vs a 92% atx loses a lot of power
example 600 watts x .75 = 450 watts / .8 = 562 watts
vs 600 watts / .92 = 652 watts.
So the savings of 150 watts because volt reduction of reduces to savings of 90 watts due to the psu lacking good efficiency .
I will do testing because I have spoken with a member about an adapter for a psu like the evga 1300 g2. It would make the psu maybe go from 92 % to 87 % and give the same volt reduction to 9 volts..
This translates to 450 watts/ .87 = 517 watts
which is better then the 562 watts possible with the cheap megawatt psu's
All of this is theory not tested. So I advise all to delay buying the megawatt psu's for just a bit of time.
So what's all the hoo haa about 0.2j/GH?
these are all possible down clock ideas.
the s-1 went from 180gh to 140gh and from 360 watts to 170 watts or 2 watts a gh to 1.2 watts
so if the ideas being tossed about can work ..
we may go from 1100 gh and 600 watts = .54 per gh to 950 gh and 400 watts = .42 per gh