I will share with you the same thing I have told someone else. I'm sure others will agree.
There is nothing wrong with the September firmware. The October firmware SUPPOSEDLY fixed the issue with rigs burning up after internet loss. I've seen two people in the forum who have had their units replaced because of burning up after losing interest and they had the October firmware. One of them lost 3 rigs due to burning up after internet loss.
Don't believe the hype about the October firmware. It does not fix that issue. It's not worth risking a $1,700 to $2,000 investment depending on the firmware having fixed that issue because it hasn't. Your investment is safer if the fan is set to manual with a setting of 75% or higher. It may be less than 75% is okay but that depends on your ambient temperature.
I'm keeping all of mine from now on with the firmware they come with and setting the fans to "manual" to avoid burning them up if the internet goes down. We already have confirmation your rigs will not burn up if you have the fans set to manual at 75% or higher. It's possible they may not burn up with the fan set at lower percentage but 75% is the lowest we have confirmation of thus far.
The S7 is an EXCELLENT rig in many aspects. The only issue [in my opinion] is the risk of burning up the rig during a long period of internet failure. How long? Who knows...
BITMAIN is still installing the September Firmware and probably mining with the September Firmware on their own personal rigs. If it was so important, I would think they would already have the updated firmware pre loaded. Even if they were to have it pre-loaded, I would not risk a $1,500 to $2,000 investment on this issue. Go to manual with the fan and do not trust the firmware update to fix the issue. That's my opinion.
I totally agree with you, I maybe misunderstood your earlier post. I thought you had the firmware that bitmain was using for the 625 rigs. However, I have no problem running my machines at a lower setting as I am fully aware for what overclocking or pushing these units to hard can cause damage wise. The financial risk is not worth it. That is why I am so against bitmains batch 8 with the 135 chip and them pushing the chips to 700 MHZ. I think that has failure written all over it and driven by greed. Just my opinion.
I have a Batch 8 on the way - and given the 135 chips 700mhz setting, I would like to underclock the rig to hit a "safe zone" just like the previous 600mhz batches -- I am hoping I can extend this rig's life as much as possible. Does this make sense?