Весь смысл того, о чем высказался Джеймс состоит в том, что некст и его идею криптозащищенных активов просто убивают.
- я внимательно читал все пламенные речи Джеймса и в слэке, и в
форуме, и не помню про убийство криптозащищённых активов... у Джеймса ровно одна неглубокая мысль: fNXT отнимает функцию форжинга у NXT, значит NXT подешевеет, значит, обесценятся ассеты. Караул, грабят. Хотя все мы понимаем, что у реального ассета есть внутренняя стоимость, соответствующая стоящему за ним бизнесу, и не связанная с ценой NXT.
Мне показался смысл высказывания jl777 другим...
sorry to say you have been distracted to an issue that is easy to understand and the trick of changing the discussion to one that all can understand hides the fundamental fact that implicitly if we are discussing fNXT distribution it is ALREADY decided NXT is split
WHEN was that decided?
without any discussion
1 + 1 = 2
NXT + fNXT = current NXT
so if you even create fNXT current NXT is devalued
which means to maintain current prices asset prices would need to go UP, not down
and everyone things that asset prices will go down due to the greed to get the fNXT
so if that happens an asset loses half its value because the price doesnt change automatic and 2 - 1 = 1
and then people are selling it on top, that might make it drop 75%
but this is ok for some INSANE reason, because it is impossible using java to have childchains and not split NXT
oh, but it is not impossible. the reason was that it wasnt worth the time to implement the code to handle two cases, old NXT inside fNXT and the NXT like features for childchains
Until someone can exactly predict the fNXT value relative to NXT and a way to instantly adjust prices UPWARD for that and then maintain the value of NXT (not fNXT) moving forward, then there is no solution
I am not smart enough to figure out even any approach that starts to solve the above problem because it is like saying the plane cannot have wings
or an engine
the NXT 2.0 would have to compete with a feature set that any other child chain has
long term
forever
so it is a one time deflation event and a forever crippling of NXT tech advantage
but NXT gains so much from the childchains, right?
WRONG
in fact the better childchains do, the worse for NXT
that is because they all share the fNXT as the only forged blockchain
which means a competing popular chain can outbid the NXT chain for fees and make it so NXT blocks have a hard time confirming
the current NXT holders will take a loss to support the NXT? but what if they have equal stakes in the new childchain too?
now this is what is wrong with the current solution and I am 99.99% sure that it will not be possible given the constraint that NXT is split to protect the asset holders. There is a chance satoshi will swoop in for the rescue and come up with some totally magical solution that I cant even see the possibility of
Even so, why are we self-inflicting this on ourselves?
Because of the refusal to do a bit of extra technical work and accept at most 1GB/year blockchain growth
ALSO, if the precedence is set for fNXT, what prevents hNXT, iNXT, jNXT, kNXT, ....
a new hardfork each year that allows the NXT holders to transfer value from an unrepresented subset of the ecosystem
Is it ok for a crypto to behave like a fiat govt?
This attempt at a forced hardfork deflating and devaluing assets is WORSE than what ripple does
so NXT price will probably go way up
but I will not help such a non-crypto
The fact that others do not see this plain fact makes them either not very smart or disingenuous
