As the investors can be tricked to believe in a project, announcers and bounty managers too can.
But bounty managers should be responsible in sharing any suspicious progress they know to prevent investors loss as soon as possible.
Rather doing that, here most of the bounty managers keeps on working for the scam project as they are paid to do so.
Knowingly presenting a scam as a legitimate project should also be considered a fraud.
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 45. (Read 5981 times)
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
For me its not they fault .its not easy to predict the scammer .we know that many scammer is here but you dont have care to make your own to not be scam by others .all you need is carefully
though they cant be entirely blamed. but a basic due delegence is required to be performed by them.
It is not easy for Bounty managers to predict scam. It is better to talk to Bounty manager ad make a solution by which you can contact team of ICO , if it is scam then take help of bounty manager and raise voice against ICO team.
There are too many coins coming out every week. Its hard to control all of them. So people will just let them run and hope for lucks that they are legit
basically all bounty, manager and all team want the project to succeed, I am sure all have worked maximally, so no need to blame, we start from the beginning, never give up keep trying to find until we can succeed.
unless there is fraud then we are obliged to punish
unless there is fraud then we are obliged to punish
Yes I also think that the bounty managers should not be blamed whenever the ico fails or is a scam. These managers are also victims like us. They dont know in the first place that the ico they are managing is a scam.
basically all bounty, manager and all team want the project to succeed, I am sure all have worked maximally, so no need to blame, we start from the beginning, never give up keep trying to find until we can succeed.
unless there is fraud then we are obliged to punish
unless there is fraud then we are obliged to punish
Blaming bounty manager?You cant blame them because they are not anti scam agents to predict scam ICO's but we should blame ourselves.
I think for ico failed or any bounty manager frauds do not need to be blamed they just work and paid just to make a gift tread and they also do not guarantee a project they agree is not necessarily successful, bounty manager is not a team of ICO, who guaranteeing a successful project to its fullest.
I think this is not entirely wrong with the manager. In this case, too, managers also become victims of fraud, managers do not know that the ICO is a fraud. If the manager intends to deceive the participants and their contributors, maybe the manager will follow to disappear immediately and leave the ICO and will not make an apology to the participants and the contributor. I hope you can be wiser in facing any problems. Because this is also part of your mistake that is not careful and meticulous in following the ICO.
blaming a bounty manager is the wrong thing. because a bounty manager just doing their job, so they also don't know the ico that they handle is problematic. it can be a learning for bounty managers to understanding the ico which will be handled, so the things like this will not happen again. and for the bounty hunter it would be better if before following an ico, we can check the profile of bounty managers and the teams that handle it first.
There are some reputable bounty managers that do their research well before managing any campaign. They know that their reputation is at stake if the bounty defaults in paying the hunters. While they're not a part of the team, they have the responsibility to ensure that the project that they're promoting is a good one. In the case of the successful ICOs that don't pay bounty hunters, it will be better if the bounty managers have the funds escrowed before starting the campaign.
By the way, I also participated in the Uchit bounty. Such a pity these scams exist Embarrassed
By the way, I also participated in the Uchit bounty. Such a pity these scams exist Embarrassed
The bounty manager only publishes and manages the bounty. It is not responsible for project development and fund management. It can be said that he is only an intermediary between the project party and the bounty hunter and cannot be responsible for the authenticity of the project.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think because the bounty manager is the organizer of the bonus campaign. It is their responsibility to consider whether the project is reputable or not, many bounty managers only need the money that these projects offer for their work. So when that bounty when scammed, they will receive negative credibility
In my opinion, bonus managers are not faulted here. They did not know it was a fraudulent ICO. But they will have a responsibility to contact the project team ... In general, even the rewards managers and project participants need to carefully study and carefully select the project before engaging.
The person who wants to position himself as a bounty manager should be an expert in researching the ICO that he will manage his bounty program. So he is not blamed as the parent of the victims of the campaign participants.
I think that bounty manager should not be blamed. Because they doesn't know if the project SCAM or not. Even good bounty manager too, can make mistakes.
Most bounty manage have a disclaimer from get go about the bounty campaign they are running. Even at this, bounty manager most do their work thoroughly by investigating and protecting their own image first and their bounty hunters!
Yes, I think as a bounty manger, they should have responsibe to their bounty. They should check carefully before they get the project.
For the bounty hunter, bounty manger are the one of the ico project. So they blame the bounty manger.
For the bounty hunter, bounty manger are the one of the ico project. So they blame the bounty manger.
as far as I know, some prominent gift managers who do research well before managing any campaign. They know that their reputation is at stake if the bonus fails to pay the hunter. Although they are not part of the team, they have a responsibility to ensure that the project they are promoting is good. So it's better to pay in a token that is worthless than not paying at all.
Fraud is unacceptable and should be resolved. The reward manager should be blamed, but we can't blame them all. So we need to find good reward programs to join in to make sure we don't get cheated.
Yes, though some managers we are facing problems because after campaign promotion they are taking time to send the payments but for payments, they are taking very long time. Some ICO is cheating managers too.
Jump to: