Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 46. (Read 5969 times)
The Uchit looks good and sounds good but only a true blockchain researcher can decipher the real motives of the ICO so I feel sorry for those who have joined because it seems like there are so many victims in here. Just a reminder to others that don't put so much trust in low ranking bounty managers.
I want to say, if this Fraud in the blockchain sector exists, and will continue to exist, until there is a general rule of the market, at least in the largest countries, which protects investors and even bounty hunters. I hope everyone can be alert and report on projects not obeying at the right time so that others can avoid losses.
Fraud is unacceptable and should be resolved. The reward manager should be blamed, but we can't blame them all. So we need to find good reward programs to join in to make sure we don't get cheated.
One thing that I always did as a bounty hunter, is to check the liability of the author of the thread ( bounty campaign thread ). Don't go or don't join to those crypto project that has a red trust marked of the author. Please keep on mind that the bounty manager is still a part of that project, so they need to be careful to manage those scam and fraud project.
I always choose to manage popular forums in the forum because they will have better censorship, this will help bounty hunters can be more secure in their work. I think we should not choose low-rank managers because most are scam projects 
Yes, I think that bounty managers can be blame. Before accepting campaigns they need to have a proper screening on it. It is their name who is involved which many hunters patronize.
You got it folks!,that is the risky woofie dopie nature of the campaign manager, that's why they have a good payment on every campaign project. They need to understand that at some cause.
No, bounty manager are just to run a bounty campaig, however they have some mistake for not chrcking the project before it have an agreement so their reputation will be on good. But in case a project become scam we cant never blame them because we choose to be oart of the program. Move on and nit oarticipate again on that manager. Best to picl magaer which bounties are oftenly oaying
I also agree that I can't completely blame the bounty manager because we have to learn to judge ourselves.
Yes, I think that bounty managers can be blame. Before accepting campaigns they need to have a proper screening on it. It is their name who is involved which many hunters patronize.
You got it folks!,that is the risky woofie dopie nature of the campaign manager, that's why they have a good payment on every campaign project. They need to understand that at some cause.
Yes, I think that bounty managers can be blame. Before accepting campaigns they need to have a proper screening on it. It is their name who is involved which many hunters patronize.
To some extent,they share in the blame unless of course they place a disclaimer not along side the bounty thread.some persons just look at the reputation of the manager with the assumption that they must have done some checks on the project
But still, the main character of the thread is the campaign manager. So, the credit will be at him/her first, simple as like that. Just putting some sense on it.
To some extent,they share in the blame unless of course they place a disclaimer not along side the bounty thread.some persons just look at the reputation of the manager with the assumption that they must have done some checks on the project
One thing that I always did as a bounty hunter, is to check the liability of the author of the thread ( bounty campaign thread ). Don't go or don't join to those crypto project that has a red trust marked of the author. Please keep on mind that the bounty manager is still a part of that project, so they need to be careful to manage those scam and fraud project.
No, of course we dont need to blame bounty managers. If project become scam, they are scammed like we are too. And just imagine how big work they did, controling everything, counting thousands stakes, answering people questions. Nobody can predict scam from the first time
I do not think that the managers of bounty campaigns are to blame for the fact that the project was a Scam. Perhaps the Manager was given enough time and resources was devoted to the selection of the bounty campaigns. But often managers also participate in the bounty campaign, wear a signature and also become a victim of deception. Bounty participants and managers must be on the same side.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
We can blame both the investors and the bounty manager because the bounty manager still lack knowledge and experience. The reason we can blame the investors is because the bounty manager rank was Jr member which the scam ICO owner could be the holder of the account.
In fact, the Manager himself does not receive a reward.So here to condemn the Manager is not necessary.It's just the only person you can blame for everything.But it is nonsense, it should be understood.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
This question can not be answered unequivocally. It all depends on the situation. Bounty Manager is same hired worker as a Bounty Hunter, just a manager. Therefore, if he responsibly approached the choice of the project, but was deceived as well as the Hunters, but up to the end defended the rights of workers, he certainly is not guilty. But if he simply spat at the fact that the Hunters were deceived or knew from the outset that the project was substandard, then it is entirely his fault.
Actually both bounty managers and bounty hunters are responsible to verify the project is worth to join and legit at all. Because not only the manager should be blame they had an effort to choose the project somehow they must really check if the team capabale to pay and capable to develop the project.
I agree with you. Bounty managers have some responsibilities, but they can be mislead as well. Bounty managers don't have the authority and the resources needed to check every project in a depth and see every detail.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managers should not be blamed for such uncertainty because they are also negatively affected by scams. Also, scams projects cannot be determined at first, the reputation of the bounty managers is on the line and they won't surely promote a project if they are already awared that it would be a scam.
Actually both bounty managers and bounty hunters are responsible to verify the project is worth to join and legit at all. Because not only the manager should be blame they had an effort to choose the project somehow they must really check if the team capabale to pay and capable to develop the project.
Jump to: