ASICMINER Auction: 50 Block Erupter Blades CHECK OP FOR PAYMENT - page 3.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: WinTame2012 on May 12, 2013, 06:39:54 PM

Guys,
What's the best pool (in terms of efficiency) for Erupter Blades so far?

Slush using stratum proxy, although if you work out how to set it up for others I don't see why it wouldn't be any other pool.

drlatino999

sr. member

Activity: 335

Merit: 250

Quote from: WinTame2012 on May 12, 2013, 06:39:54 PM

Guys,
What's the best pool (in terms of efficiency) for Erupter Blades so far?

I've pulled 97/98% for bitminter and Slush. Others are at 98/99% with slush.

WinTame2012

sr. member

Activity: 315

Merit: 250

Official sponsor of Microsoft Corp.

Guys,
What's the best pool (in terms of efficiency) for Erupter Blades so far?

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

You both have nicer stats than me, not sure what I'm doing wrong. Do you use -rt to the stratum proxy? I'm trying one without that flag as a test..

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: Caesium on May 12, 2013, 05:13:52 PM

Just to confirm, you see a solid 178.00 shares/minute always? I have never seen that ever, but I think mostly its because of stales pulling down the accepted efficiency.

Could you paste one of your outputs from the webpage?

Total MHS:   13046
Received:   0000091550
Accepted:   0000091170
Per Minute:   178.29
Efficiency:   099.58%
Up Time:   0d,08h,31m,21s

Total MHS:   13022
Received:   0000091634
Accepted:   0000091080
Per Minute:   177.94
Efficiency:   099.39%
Up Time:   0d,08h,31m,50s

Damn lenny, that 99.98 is sexual. For some reason I haven't seen either blade go over 24 hours. It either says its restarted, or it is actually restarting roughly once a day. Not got the new cooling on yet, but its hardly hot and its typically restarting at cool times of the day/night.

lenny_

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

DARKNETMARKETS.COM

That's my stats:

Code:

Total MHS: 13149
Received: 0000139705
Accepted: 0000139687
Per Minute: 179.17
Efficiency: 099.98%
Up Time: 0d,12h,59m,36s

Code:

Total MHS: 13030
Received: 0000139723
Accepted: 0000138821
Per Minute: 178.07
Efficiency: 099.35%
Up Time: 0d,12h,59m,33s

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Just to confirm, you see a solid 178.00 shares/minute always? I have never seen that ever, but I think mostly its because of stales pulling down the accepted efficiency.

Could you paste one of your outputs from the webpage?

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: Caesium on May 12, 2013, 04:39:29 PM

Well, I just left it to settle for a bit..

1: 12928 MH/s 271456/ 275231 176.65/min 98.62% 0s up 025h 36:41
2: 12966 MH/s 272246/ 275240 177.18/min 98.91% 0s up 025h 36:33
3: 12899 MH/s 249589/ 253824 176.26/min 98.33% 5s up 023h 36:01
4: 12945 MH/s 11683/ 11808 176.92/min 98.94% 0s up 001h 06:02

I think there's quite a lot of factors at play to be honest:
a) latency of my Internet connection as it actually submits shares
b) blocks found lead to a drop, because these units don't do LP
c) pool load
d) stratum proxy (and PC its running on) load
e) local network layout as you say, but can't do much about that, I need to use a switch or I haven't got enough ports :p

They're all around 177 shares/min which isn't catastrophic at the end of the day.

Ah well. Yours are clearly broken so you might as well give them to me

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Well, I just left it to settle for a bit..

1: 12928 MH/s 271456/ 275231 176.65/min 98.62% 0s up 025h 36:41
2: 12966 MH/s 272246/ 275240 177.18/min 98.91% 0s up 025h 36:33
3: 12899 MH/s 249589/ 253824 176.26/min 98.33% 5s up 023h 36:01
4: 12945 MH/s 11683/ 11808 176.92/min 98.94% 0s up 001h 06:02

I think there's quite a lot of factors at play to be honest:
a) latency of my Internet connection as it actually submits shares
b) blocks found lead to a drop, because these units don't do LP
c) pool load
d) stratum proxy (and PC its running on) load
e) local network layout as you say, but can't do much about that, I need to use a switch or I haven't got enough ports :p

They're all around 177 shares/min which isn't catastrophic at the end of the day.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: Caesium on May 12, 2013, 04:09:22 PM

Replied in PM. It's just a bit of very ugly Ruby, but if anyone else is interested,

http://telon.net/asic_status.rb.txt

I have local DNS entries that make my asics reachable at asic1/2/3/4, if you don't you may need to replace with an IP where necessary. Sorry it's so ugly and basic, it was only a 5 minute hack to get information into a Terminal I can watch

Investigate the position of the proxy rather than the platform. Another user had problems going through a switch to the blades, rather than straight to the router. but the fact its changed at ALL, suggests there is room for improvement.

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Replied in PM. It's just a bit of very ugly Ruby, but if anyone else is interested,

http://telon.net/asic_status.rb.txt

I have local DNS entries that make my asics reachable at asic1/2/3/4, if you don't you may need to replace with an IP where necessary. Sorry it's so ugly and basic, it was only a 5 minute hack to get information into a Terminal I can watch

lenny_

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

DARKNETMARKETS.COM

Caesium, can you please share your script to format output data from blades?

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

You got me wondering, so I tried moving the proxy of 4:

4: 12553 MH/s 3794/ 3936 171.80/min 96.39% 3s up 000h 22:05

seems even worse after 22 minutes. It was on a Linux HP Microserver previously, thats on a Windows box with a bit more power - maybe Windows just sucks at this sort of thing.

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com

Quote from: Caesium on May 12, 2013, 01:41:38 PM

this is the output of a little script I wrote to get all the interesting data into one place..

1: 12949 MH/s 240824/ 243858 176.95/min 98.75% 4s up 022h 40:58
2: 12986 MH/s 241489/ 243866 177.45/min 99.02% 4s up 022h 40:53
3: 12886 MH/s 218411/ 222339 176.08/min 98.23% 4s up 020h 40:24
4: 12790 MH/s 14848/ 15200 174.79/min 97.69% 4s up 001h 24:56

That's fairly atypical for me, maybe a little lower than normal, I've seen anything up to 178 shares/minute.

Hitting 13000 exactly, 178 exactly. You might want to try moving your stratum proxy about, or testing 2 different proxies on 2 computers etc. Does look like your 4 is maxing out current arrangement.

Caesium

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

this is the output of a little script I wrote to get all the interesting data into one place..

1: 12949 MH/s 240824/ 243858 176.95/min 98.75% 4s up 022h 40:58
2: 12986 MH/s 241489/ 243866 177.45/min 99.02% 4s up 022h 40:53
3: 12886 MH/s 218411/ 222339 176.08/min 98.23% 4s up 020h 40:24
4: 12790 MH/s 14848/ 15200 174.79/min 97.69% 4s up 001h 24:56

That's fairly atypical for me, maybe a little lower than normal, I've seen anything up to 178 shares/minute.

lenny_

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

DARKNETMARKETS.COM

What's your efficiency guys?
My 2 units are getting exactly 178 and 179 diff shares per minute, after many hours of uptime. I am cooling them with 2x2 Arctic Cooling F12 120mm fans. No problems with overheating or power at all, absolutely stable since fitted:)

lightbox

full member

Activity: 212

Merit: 100

Quote from: Pinwheel on May 09, 2013, 09:18:05 PM

Quote from: lightbox on May 06, 2013, 11:56:39 PM

Figured I should post some pics of my setup too. The rack cost me about $10 to make (CPVC), everything from RONA.

snip

best rack in this tread
but in my experience having blowers blowing air directly on heat-sink is must. Especially if room is hot and blade run on HIGH clock.

Thanks!

dogie

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1185

dogiecoin.com