Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 1134. (Read 3917058 times)

newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Let's keep focused on the big picture here. At the scale AM operates this is a waste of time.

-helixone

couldn't have put it any better. If they don't all sell, the price will drop. If they all sell (and, I have a hunch that they will,) then the price was, in fact, right. It's not worth friedcat's time to worry about individually shipping these things out, or about making sure he hits the market pricing exactly right at all times. Bulk orders will move money, and that's all that matters at this point.

I thought the question was about the potential for mining altcoins like NMC.  I am confused by this reply, as it seems to be in regard to something else.
sr. member
Activity: 356
Merit: 255
Let's keep focused on the big picture here. At the scale AM operates this is a waste of time.

-helixone

couldn't have put it any better. If they don't all sell, the price will drop. If they all sell (and, I have a hunch that they will,) then the price was, in fact, right. It's not worth friedcat's time to worry about individually shipping these things out, or about making sure he hits the market pricing exactly right at all times. Bulk orders will move money, and that's all that matters at this point.
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
About the NMC, if ASICMINER exchanges it on BTC-e, it should make it in a way that does not make the exchange rate sink down. The market for NMC is really shallow compared to BTC.

Besides, BTC-e is not the only NMC exchange, Vircurex and Cryptonit also exchange NMC <-> BTC

Folks, my sense here, is that even if he could get this to work, Friedcat would be mis-utilizing his time and energy to pursue this, as he is pressed to capacity hiring solid people, doing accounting and transfers, working on building out datacenters, sourcing parts, running a mining operation, running auctions, and generally overseeing production of a crap ton of boards and usb sticks.

Let's keep focused on the big picture here. At the scale AM operates this is a waste of time.

-helixone
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
About the NMC, if ASICMINER exchanges it on BTC-e, it should make it in a way that does not make the exchange rate sink down. The market for NMC is really shallow compared to BTC.

Besides, BTC-e is not the only NMC exchange, Vircurex and Cryptonit also exchange NMC <-> BTC
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Another 1.5T online, temporarily allocated on bitminter. Will switch to solo later on.

Also, what about the NMC proceeds? Will those be changed to btcs on, let's say, btc-e?

Good question.  If AM is mining in a pool that multi-mines other alt-coins, or solo mines, we may as well take advantage of that.  If they get paid out to shareholders, then each shareholder would need to give friedcat a payout address for  the other coins though, and that might be an unwelcome headache for him.

However,if AM does get the alt-coins though, and does convert them to BTC, it would be nice to get the official reply about that...
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
The rewards graph shows the last 500 shifts, that's currently the last 16 days. First 8 days are about average, some lucky, some not, and the last 3 were pretty unlucky. Now people are saying we didn't have one lucky day for an entire year.

Wouldn't it be possible to extend the time axis to a whole year? I guess it would pretty much dismiss all possible FUD attempts. Using sampled data may help with graphing performance, but I suppose it's not that easy to do.

When there is some good luck "BitMinter is a very profitable place to mine" and when there is some bad luck "there must be a bug causing that". I've heard both of those a few times before. Wink

If it's just that then it's all well. As far as I am concerned, I'm not saying there is any bug, I just asked a question on the other thread to ask more experienced BitMinters if they had seen it in the past or not, and how long we should expect before catching up with expected rewards.

PS: this is off-topic and should be discussed on the other thread I think
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

And check the last pages of this thread too Sad

The rewards graph shows the last 500 shifts, that's currently the last 16 days. First 8 days are about average, some lucky, some not, and the last 3 were pretty unlucky. Now people are saying we didn't have one lucky day for an entire year.

Didn't have the data to do the match yet, but I doubt the rotten luck is explained by probabilities alone, likely a bug somewhere.

If you actually have a reason to believe something is wrong, please let me know what leads you to believe that.

When there is some good luck "BitMinter is a very profitable place to mine" and when there is some bad luck "there must be a bug causing that". I've heard both of those a few times before. Wink
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 500
bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

And check the last pages of this thread too Sad

Didn't have the data to do the match yet, but I doubt the rotten luck is explained by probabilities alone, likely a bug somewhere.

Probably have to seek alternate pool, bitparking used to be good but not reliable anymore.  Anyone with good suggestions?

I have very good experience with Slush's Pool.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

And check the last pages of this thread too Sad

Didn't have the data to do the match yet, but I doubt the rotten luck is explained by probabilities alone, likely a bug somewhere.

Probably have to seek alternate pool, bitparking used to be good but not reliable anymore.  Anyone with good suggestions?

this is only temporary, as friedcat have written, they are testing and switching to solo mining
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

And check the last pages of this thread too Sad

Didn't have the data to do the match yet, but I doubt the rotten luck is explained by probabilities alone, likely a bug somewhere.

Probably have to seek alternate pool, bitparking used to be good but not reliable anymore.  Anyone with good suggestions?
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

And check the last pages of this thread too Sad
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Another 1.5T online, temporarily allocated on bitminter. Will switch to solo later on.

Also, what about the NMC proceeds? Will those be changed to btcs on, let's say, btc-e?

bitminter is a low fee merged mine PPLNS pool, on paper looks good, but somehow, their 'luck' is extremely rotten - just check the income section and look at CDF.  Check the luck and reward section too.

What's the deployment target?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
Bitfountain mentioned in CCTV report!

http://tv.cntv.cn/video/C10329/e5ee4fe9a62b4b24b1080327faaafcb7

This is as accurate a translation as I can get for that section:
Quote
On the biggest mining pool in the Bitcoin community [BTCGuild], one miner, with ID 67717, has been at the top of the hashrate rankings for a while.  "Oh, that guy is called friedcat, and he runs a company in Shenzhen," [says a Chinese Bitcoiner.]  "This 67717 account is the fastest miner in the world."  Although there are only 4 people in [friedcat's] company, it is making 286,000 renminbi a day.  Not only miners have benefitted from the Bitcoin boom.  The mining hardware manufacturers, too, have become centimillionaires [in CNY]. 
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Another 1.5T online, temporarily allocated on bitminter. Will switch to solo later on.

Also, what about the NMC proceeds? Will those be changed to btcs on, let's say, btc-e?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
I don't know guys... 1.99 per piece seems like too much to me. If it were auction, than I would understand, but fixed price... I don't see the demand for 10 000 usb miner at 1.99 BTC

agreed. as i posted in my group buy thread:

minimum order of 300 x 1.99 btc = 597 btc exactly. ...wow. that's insane, when you realize avalon sells 10,000 chips (33 times more chips, but bare chips) for 780 btc.

i mean, that's what, .078 btc a chip? and then you have burnin offering 10 chip board for approx 80 euro, and 20 chip boards for approx 100 euro (plus chip cost of course) that's approximately 5 ghash for under 200 USD, if my math is right.

The major difference is that this is a finished product . Sure, you can buy a barrel of oil for around $2 per gallon if you order in bulk, but still even US people buy gas for $4 per gallon. The convenience of buying just what you need rather than have a supertanker on your doorstep, the complete conversion of the raw material into a ready-to-use plug-and-play product, the reduced risk of not having to handle large orders; consumers love the ability to avoid such hassles.

Add to that the mere psychological effect of being part of a movement, and I think these miners will be an easy sell, even at the added cost that a bulk buyer would have to charge consumers.

Just imagine having a shelf of "Real moneymaking machines, just $297" at Wallmart.

.b

...well, yea. all very good points.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
http://coin.furuknap.net/
I don't know guys... 1.99 per piece seems like too much to me. If it were auction, than I would understand, but fixed price... I don't see the demand for 10 000 usb miner at 1.99 BTC

agreed. as i posted in my group buy thread:

minimum order of 300 x 1.99 btc = 597 btc exactly. ...wow. that's insane, when you realize avalon sells 10,000 chips (33 times more chips, but bare chips) for 780 btc.

i mean, that's what, .078 btc a chip? and then you have burnin offering 10 chip board for approx 80 euro, and 20 chip boards for approx 100 euro (plus chip cost of course) that's approximately 5 ghash for under 200 USD, if my math is right.

The major difference is that this is a finished product . Sure, you can buy a barrel of oil for around $2 per gallon if you order in bulk, but still even US people buy gas for $4 per gallon. The convenience of buying just what you need rather than have a supertanker on your doorstep, the complete conversion of the raw material into a ready-to-use plug-and-play product, the reduced risk of not having to handle large orders; consumers love the ability to avoid such hassles.

Add to that the mere psychological effect of being part of a movement, and I think these miners will be an easy sell, even at the added cost that a bulk buyer would have to charge consumers.

Just imagine having a shelf of "Real moneymaking machines, just $297" at Wallmart.

.b
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
I don't know guys... 1.99 per piece seems like too much to me. If it were auction, than I would understand, but fixed price... I don't see the demand for 10 000 usb miner at 1.99 BTC

agreed. as i posted in my group buy thread:

minimum order of 300 x 1.99 btc = 597 btc exactly. ...wow. that's insane, when you realize avalon sells 10,000 chips (33 times more chips, but bare chips) for 780 btc.

i mean, that's what, .078 btc a chip? and then you have burnin offering 10 chip board for approx 80 euro, and 20 chip boards for approx 100 euro (plus chip cost of course) that's approximately 5 ghash for under 200 USD, if my math is right.

Yes, but these are real products, made and ready to ship. I can use one of these right away. What would I do with a avalon chip? it would take me 10 years to figure out how to do anything.

Dont forget that the chips need 10 weeks after payment until the buyer receives it. Then he send it to the miner-creator and gets it back after some time. That wont be some days only too. Having a miner right away will be worth something.
sr. member
Activity: 362
Merit: 250
The Block Erupter USB sticks passed all the tests and we are about to produce them in quantity.

"In quantity". I like those words.

Very many ideas thrown around here for the auction of these (possibly good, but experimental and possibly confusing to customers).

So let me throw in an idea too: fixed price 2 BTC, first come first served! Much more manageable, affordable and relatable. And a price/hash a little above what the Blades have been getting.

Works for me, I'm first in line and I will buy them all (to auction later).  

So, should that be considered a binding offer? Wink

Anyway, I think there are more than enough people willing to pay that price. (Even though there are apparently many people also not willing to pay that price.)
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
I don't know guys... 1.99 per piece seems like too much to me. If it were auction, than I would understand, but fixed price... I don't see the demand for 10 000 usb miner at 1.99 BTC

agreed. as i posted in my group buy thread:

minimum order of 300 x 1.99 btc = 597 btc exactly. ...wow. that's insane, when you realize avalon sells 10,000 chips (33 times more chips, but bare chips) for 780 btc.

i mean, that's what, .078 btc a chip? and then you have burnin offering 10 chip board for approx 80 euro, and 20 chip boards for approx 100 euro (plus chip cost of course) that's approximately 5 ghash for under 200 USD, if my math is right.

Can we please let the market decide and you order off Avalon meanwhile?

absolutely. and note: i won't be ordering off avalon. i much prefer sticking where i'm invested, and that's AM. i may not like the price, but i am willing to pay it. i'm just expressing my opinion, not trying to force them to change it. course at this exact moment, i'm too broke to afford even one of these, so there ya go.
legendary
Activity: 2271
Merit: 1363
I don't know guys... 1.99 per piece seems like too much to me. If it were auction, than I would understand, but fixed price... I don't see the demand for 10 000 usb miner at 1.99 BTC

agreed. as i posted in my group buy thread:

minimum order of 300 x 1.99 btc = 597 btc exactly. ...wow. that's insane, when you realize avalon sells 10,000 chips (33 times more chips, but bare chips) for 780 btc.

i mean, that's what, .078 btc a chip? and then you have burnin offering 10 chip board for approx 80 euro, and 20 chip boards for approx 100 euro (plus chip cost of course) that's approximately 5 ghash for under 200 USD, if my math is right.

Can we please let the market decide and you order off Avalon meanwhile?
Jump to: