Pages:
Author

Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It - page 20. (Read 3917029 times)

full member
Activity: 146
Merit: 100
So nobody produces and ships anything or what? Smiley Maybe they are very busy with next gen.
The original poster had a specific set of limitations:
- .28J/Gh chip
- .28J/Gh miner
That eliminates most of them to begin with - if not on the first one (though honestly most developers have only recently been posting fudged numbers on efficiency) then almost certainly on the second one.

But yes, Spondoolies-Tech is out of stock and seems to be in the process of changing their business model - see also the bitcoin shop 'letter of intent' to merge with them.

On the up side, there's other companies trying to fill the void - SFARDS has a new chip coming out, LK Group is planning one, Lightning ASIC may or may not be planning one, 21 Inc may be announcing things, etc.  Unfortunately though, the climate is very much heading towards further consolidation (seem my ranty rant post on that subject), and except for SFARDS none of them have made any positive statements with regard to small scale mining.

I was thinking about how the market has condensed..

Essentially if I am correct, within six months the amount of vendors offering ASICs for retail mining sales (consumer availability) will be zero, and power-efficient mining (chips of .28nm or smaller) will be solely in the hands of large centralized parties...

Hash rate will stagnate and rhe major entities will hold status quo until the next halving... Then without major asic breakthroughs in efficiency we will probably see some major players drop out or unplug. 

Power draws don't drop exponentially, but costs of smaller and smaller masks/designs do escalate.. and the halving will alter running costs dramatically.

I envision 2016-17 as a battleground where the 'Bitcoin Network' essentially is owned by 5-6 Large entities who control the majority of the hash rate...and therefore collect most of the mining fees... The new world conglomerates if you will.

Any new entrants who even try to compete will need a competing design and +$10-20Million just to start playing the Asic game...and a lot of coins to capture at 12/block just to break even.

End Game.

This is why I supported AsicMiner....as Friedcat vision was to keep it decentralized... Now that he's gone, and private people can't own a share in a future mining conglomerate, all we can hope for is to buy/hold/use bitcoin itself.


hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
So nobody produces and ships anything or what? Smiley Maybe they are very busy with next gen.
The original poster had a specific set of limitations:
- .28J/Gh chip
- .28J/Gh miner
That eliminates most of them to begin with - if not on the first one (though honestly most developers have only recently been posting fudged numbers on efficiency) then almost certainly on the second one.

But yes, Spondoolies-Tech is out of stock and seems to be in the process of changing their business model - see also the bitcoin shop 'letter of intent' to merge with them.

On the up side, there's other companies trying to fill the void - SFARDS has a new chip coming out, LK Group is planning one, Lightning ASIC may or may not be planning one, 21 Inc may be announcing things, etc.  Unfortunately though, the climate is very much heading towards further consolidation (seem my ranty rant post on that subject), and except for SFARDS none of them have made any positive statements with regard to small scale mining.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
When I open their website it says everything is out of stock http://www.spondoolies-tech.com/
So nobody produces and ships anything or what? Smiley Maybe they are very busy with next gen. I will surely try to mine at home when they launch Antminer S6.
vs3
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 500
Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

I would exclude Bitmain as they've said that they currently have no available chips for sale (information as of 4/26).
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?





avalon 4.1 is sold with warranty from www.ehash.com  


 costly machine very quiet


there are threads on it in hardware .. I am running 2 of them as I type.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

He also got burned with the NeoBee scam at that time, he might just want to distantiate himself from all this mess.

Who, TaT? How did he actually get burned by NeoBee? Did he invest in there or did he operate some passthrough, as well? The NEOBEE shares on Havelock were direct NeoBee shares, weren't they? The only connection I know of is Bitfunder/Ukyo and NeoBee, they allegedly worked on restoring the BitFunder coins...
legendary
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

He also got burned with the NeoBee scam at that time, he might just want to distantiate himself from all this mess.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

Correct.  Since TaT was acting as a passthrough and 'holding' ~10,000 direct shares at the time, TaT was able to be a board member in name only since the PT shares didn't have the 'rights' that direct shares had.  I talked with TaT several times on IRC about AM.  I guess during the early days of AM, the board meetings were over Skype video chat.  Around the summer of 2013, FC stopped giving video chats and went only to text chats via Skype.  The dates / information may be a little off as I'm trying to remember detail of conversations that took place a year ago.

Interesting insight! Yeah, I remember people recounting how they even saw friedcat during the board meetings and maybe even pre-funding phase. That was during a time where he was some kind of mythological creature and the bringer of coins. I guess the decrease in information and communication was indeed a very red flag :/
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000

Does anyone know what address is 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM?

I have hacked coins that went there.

Looks like an Exchange wallet.  Most likely converted to fiat.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
and another thing...
has this been verified as the AM wallet held by FC? https://blockchain.info/address/3KBUuGko4H5ke7EVsq9B7PLK1c5Askdd7y

if so has anyone been able to follow the coins?

im looking at it but idk what im doing and get lost pretty quick. there is still 30k btc in it, but plenty moved out right around the bad news....

the majority went to 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM and 3MkwFfGNQDve7vz1z6gUDVxkuQpcSV3Mz8

after that, i have no idea?

Does anyone know what address is 3KgtbGgaX2ngstNpvyv7LwpHSweVeqGbpM?

I have hacked coins that went there.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!

Correct.  Since TaT was acting as a passthrough and 'holding' ~10,000 direct shares at the time, TaT was able to be a board member in name only since the PT shares didn't have the 'rights' that direct shares had.  I talked with TaT several times on IRC about AM.  I guess during the early days of AM, the board meetings were over Skype video chat.  Around the summer of 2013, FC stopped giving video chats and went only to text chats via Skype.  The dates / information may be a little off as I'm trying to remember detail of conversations that took place a year ago.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
FUN > ROI
I guess I don't have to advise you not to buy from BFL, right? Smiley Yeah, I guess Spondoolies, Bitmain, and BitFury are the most reliable companies out there at the moment.
Doesn't really matter much if a company is reliable if they don't really have any product to sell; BitFury doesn't really sell anymore (if you want to put together a large mine, anybody's willing to talk business, of course) and Spondoolies is out of stock and changing business models along the same lines.  On the up side, a few other companies may be joining the fray.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.

He wasn't? But with all those passthrough shares, he effectively held the "original" shares! In hindsight it was of course a wise move, but no one could have anticipated that a year ago. Also, I guess it was also due to Havelock not wanting to do business with passthrough operators, anymore. That's why they took over TaT's shares, I guess!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?

I guess I don't have to advise you not to buy from BFL, right? Smiley Yeah, I guess Spondoolies, Bitmain, and BitFury are the most reliable companies out there at the moment. I was wondering for quite some time, whether maybe the harsh climate in the mining business may have also taken its toll on the price of Bitcoin. I guess a large inflow of people interested in mining and the new ASIC hardware pushed the price up back in 2013...
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
So does nobody wonder what happened to the balances in their AMHash account? I didn't have much but it wasn't ZERO. So they are stealing that too?


I wondered at least, you can check my posts, but no answer from AM and AMHash just telling they sent everything what's left to AM for some reason...
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
So does nobody wonder what happened to the balances in their AMHash account? I didn't have much but it wasn't ZERO. So they are stealing that too?
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.

TAT was never a board member.  He was the passthrough holder for Bitfunder and Havelock.  TAT got out of the game about a year ago when AM stopped paying dividends.  A smart move for sure.
full member
Activity: 146
Merit: 100
As an aside to the general gloomy topics here, I was considering how the mining/manufacturing  climate has changed changed in the past year..

Can anyone help me building a list of the Current 2015 marketplace for private/public asic availability in the .28 or better realm??

For example:

Companies that have access to a proven functional .28 or better CHIP for Private Use:
Spondoolies, Bitmain, Bitfury, KNC, BFL

Companies that still produce publicly accessible (and shipping) ASIC miners of .28 or better.
Spondoolies; Bitmain.

Any others come quickly to mind?



hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Yeah
The absolute silence from the board is a little weird, in fact their whole role seemed a little hoary. Didn't a few leave the board precisely because they felt left in the dark?


Well there weren't that many board members known publicly to begin with
TAT, Jutarul, that one other guy and that pretty much was it to my knowledge
TAT left not sure about the other guy.

As others have said if Jutarul is not saying anything theirs likely nothing new to report.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Trust me!
So many pages here. I do recall some BoD coming on here and saying they are kept in the dark. They were implying that the AM BoD is a shadow puppet? It was only there to make AM seem legit?
Seems like a puppet organization, a diversionary tactic

 AM is legit.

  I liken them to popular yet short-lived musical talent such as The Smiths, The Doors, Joy Division, Richie Valens, Janice Joplin, Cream, Buddy Holly, Sir Mixalot, Bobby Darrin and yes even Gogmagog - the wannabe, rock super-group dripping with talent: Pete Willis (Def Leppard), Neil Murray (Whitesnake), Paul Di’Anno and Clive Burr (Iron Maiden), Janick Gers (White Spirit) which lasted but a few days.  Like AM, they added to their trade but alas, their life was short and sweet.

 In saying that, I'm hoping for one last encore!  (from AM that is)


Sounds like a weird comparison at first, but I guess it actually is pretty spot on. Back in 2012/2013 AM was able to produce the first (one of the first next to Avalon, I guess) ASICs and was also able to profit massively from the first bubble of 2013. Also, 2014 was an incredibly unlucky year.
Pages:
Jump to: