Pages:
Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 14. (Read 703060 times)

legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, something wired if miner in "Managed Miner" mode. If i set a "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" (for example i set core offset 210) all ok, offset will be applied. Then i stop miner, uncheck "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" checkbox (or recreating "Managed Miner" and field "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" is empty) the old value for core ofset will be showed in "GPU clocking" tab. Looks like AM not clear old values if value will not be explicit overriden in this mode. Please check. AM 9.9.3
Regards.
In the Options dialog, GPU Settings section, is the "Automatically reset GPU clocking parameters" set? If set, when you stopping the mining software the Core Clock should be reset.

On the GPU Clocking tab for a selected miner - is the correct Core Clock not displayed even if you click the "Reload" button to update the display of the current clocking settings?
Looks like all work normal. Simple AM need some time (arround 1min.) after i change some params in Profit Profile and then convert to managed miner mode. This got me confused. Now after you have integrated OneZeroMiner, no more needed to convert in managed miner mode))). Regards.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, thanks for quick integration of OneZeroMiner. Small bug found in onezerominer: GPU tab show hashrate only for first GPU and no process information output to console. Regards.
Thanks for testing the new OneZeroMiner. I will make sure this will be corrected in the next update.
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, thanks for quick integration of OneZeroMiner. Small bug found in onezerominer: GPU tab show hashrate only for first GPU and no process information output to console. Regards.
member
Activity: 363
Merit: 16
Awesome Miner version 9.9.4

 ASIC mining
  - Added LED flash for Bitmain firmware for Antminer S19, KA3 and K7
  - Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain
 Integrations
  - Added regions for MagicPool.co
 Mining software
  - Added mining software: OneZeroMiner
  - BzMiner 14.1.1
  - Rigel 1.3.11
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.4
  - XmRig 6.19.2


- Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain

what does this means in detail?
i can now update also amlogic via webinterface without signature check error?!?
Bitmain provides firmware files for Antminer S19 with "merge" in the filename, where they have included/merged firmware files for a number of different control boards into a single large file. In the past the provided it as separate firmware files for each control board.

In order to install one of these merged firmware files you download from the Bitmain web site, Awesome Miner can now read the firmware file and pick the part that matches your Antminer and install it. This concept is only applied if Awesome Miner finds the word "merge" in a firmware file with the .bmu file extension.

allright...so it just to have ability to install stock FW via awesome miner - not injecting custom FW stuff into this installation process
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 9.9.4

 ASIC mining
  - Added LED flash for Bitmain firmware for Antminer S19, KA3 and K7
  - Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain
 Integrations
  - Added regions for MagicPool.co
 Mining software
  - Added mining software: OneZeroMiner
  - BzMiner 14.1.1
  - Rigel 1.3.11
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.4
  - XmRig 6.19.2


- Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain

what does this means in detail?
i can now update also amlogic via webinterface without signature check error?!?
Bitmain provides firmware files for Antminer S19 with "merge" in the filename, where they have included/merged firmware files for a number of different control boards into a single large file. In the past the provided it as separate firmware files for each control board.

In order to install one of these merged firmware files you download from the Bitmain web site, Awesome Miner can now read the firmware file and pick the part that matches your Antminer and install it. This concept is only applied if Awesome Miner finds the word "merge" in a firmware file with the .bmu file extension.
member
Activity: 363
Merit: 16
Awesome Miner version 9.9.4

 ASIC mining
  - Added LED flash for Bitmain firmware for Antminer S19, KA3 and K7
  - Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain
 Integrations
  - Added regions for MagicPool.co
 Mining software
  - Added mining software: OneZeroMiner
  - BzMiner 14.1.1
  - Rigel 1.3.11
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.4
  - XmRig 6.19.2


- Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain

what does this means in detail?
i can now update also amlogic via webinterface without signature check error?!?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 9.9.4

 ASIC mining
  - Added LED flash for Bitmain firmware for Antminer S19, KA3 and K7
  - Support firmware updates for Antminer S19 with merged firmware files from Bitmain
 Integrations
  - Added regions for MagicPool.co
 Mining software
  - Added mining software: OneZeroMiner
  - BzMiner 14.1.1
  - Rigel 1.3.11
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.4
  - XmRig 6.19.2
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, something wired if miner in "Managed Miner" mode. If i set a "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" (for example i set core offset 210) all ok, offset will be applied. Then i stop miner, uncheck "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" checkbox (or recreating "Managed Miner" and field "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" is empty) the old value for core ofset will be showed in "GPU clocking" tab. Looks like AM not clear old values if value will not be explicit overriden in this mode. Please check. AM 9.9.3
Regards.
In the Options dialog, GPU Settings section, is the "Automatically reset GPU clocking parameters" set? If set, when you stopping the mining software the Core Clock should be reset.

On the GPU Clocking tab for a selected miner - is the correct Core Clock not displayed even if you click the "Reload" button to update the display of the current clocking settings?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Aye... Thanks.

Errr... I don't think the variable change thing really solves the original problem. The problem was it would constantly trigger if conditions were met, not only once when they're first met.

So I have two different variables, and a rule that triggers turning miners off if one variable is true. Then I have another rule when both variables are false that turns things back on. However, if it's setup normally the miners will keep resetting (turning off) as long as one of the variables is true and with the 'detect change' wont be able to know the correct state that both need to be in to turn things back on.
Thanks for the feedback.

If I understand correctly, your rules looks something like this today.
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Stop miners
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Start miners

Do you think this concept could work?
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Set Var3=true
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Set Var3=false
Rule#3: If Var3=true and Var3 has changed -> Stop miners
Rule#4: If Var3=false and Var3 has changed -> Start miners

This way the actions for Rule#3 and #4 should only run once.

This does work, I feel as though the 'detect change' or 'comparison' should instead be checkboxes, instead of radial buttons and could eliminate this, while being more intuitive and simplistic. So it could do both in one or either/or.

I don't know if you can do anything about the rulespam, but the comparison activates every 6s and keeps hitting the logs, which buries anything of value.
Thanks for the feedback.

Is it entries in the Awesome Miner log file you are referring to? I did find a few related to triggers but not many. Can you give an example and I will look into it in more detail? Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, noncerpro miner have rebranding, now this miner is onezerominer. Supports DynexSolve algo.
Please integrate in Awesome Miner this miner. Hashrate is much better with this miner.
https://github.com/OneZeroMiner/onezerominer
Regards
Thanks for the request - this one will be supported in the near future.
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, something wired if miner in "Managed Miner" mode. If i set a "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" (for example i set core offset 210) all ok, offset will be applied. Then i stop miner, uncheck "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" checkbox (or recreating "Managed Miner" and field "GPU Clocking Profile when starting" is empty) the old value for core ofset will be showed in "GPU clocking" tab. Looks like AM not clear old values if value will not be explicit overriden in this mode. Please check. AM 9.9.3
Regards.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Aye... Thanks.

Errr... I don't think the variable change thing really solves the original problem. The problem was it would constantly trigger if conditions were met, not only once when they're first met.

So I have two different variables, and a rule that triggers turning miners off if one variable is true. Then I have another rule when both variables are false that turns things back on. However, if it's setup normally the miners will keep resetting (turning off) as long as one of the variables is true and with the 'detect change' wont be able to know the correct state that both need to be in to turn things back on.
Thanks for the feedback.

If I understand correctly, your rules looks something like this today.
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Stop miners
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Start miners

Do you think this concept could work?
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Set Var3=true
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Set Var3=false
Rule#3: If Var3=true and Var3 has changed -> Stop miners
Rule#4: If Var3=false and Var3 has changed -> Start miners

This way the actions for Rule#3 and #4 should only run once.

This does work, I feel as though the 'detect change' or 'comparison' should instead be checkboxes, instead of radial buttons and could eliminate this, while being more intuitive and simplistic. So it could do both in one or either/or.

I don't know if you can do anything about the rulespam, but the comparison activates every 6s and keeps hitting the logs, which buries anything of value.
member
Activity: 418
Merit: 21
Hi Patrik,

I just tested the newest AM version. Your correction to the Rigel miner API seems to be working well now. No crazy things anymore with admin rights or without or mixed on all my rigs. AM also shows the devices correctly now without setting the device order manually.

A huge thanks too you!  Grin


EDIT: Yes please, integrate the OneZeroMiner. It also comes with an API. Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, noncerpro miner have rebranding, now this miner is onezerominer. Supports DynexSolve algo.
Please integrate in Awesome Miner this miner. Hashrate is much better with this miner.
https://github.com/OneZeroMiner/onezerominer
Regards
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrik,

or anyone who knows this Huh And sorry if this was answered already somewhere, couldn't find it...

Just playing around with the good old Profit Profiles and the Profit Switcher. How does AM knows the second coin to calculate the profit in the Profit Switcher if I can only set the hashrates and wattages? Just as an example: I want to use Gminer to dual mine ERGO (Autolykos 2) and KASPA together, but also solo mine just KASPA, whatever combination is just the highest. The Profit Switcher only shows me the profit of ERGO and the profit of KASPA, but not the profit of ERGO+KASPA. Sorry, but I don't get it... Is this possible with the profit switcher right now? Or do I have to use the Managed Miner and switch it by hand with my profiles?
What you point out here is simply a limitation in the profit switching design right now. It was initially for the days where Ethereum was the primary coin and in addition to this could could set a dual hashrate/power for a few secondary coins. Today some software like SrbMiner-Multi can do dual mining of almost any combination of coins - so in theory you could have something like 1000 combinations.

The idea is to improve the profit switcher to handle scenarios where the primary coin is something else than EtHash.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Aye... Thanks.

Errr... I don't think the variable change thing really solves the original problem. The problem was it would constantly trigger if conditions were met, not only once when they're first met.

So I have two different variables, and a rule that triggers turning miners off if one variable is true. Then I have another rule when both variables are false that turns things back on. However, if it's setup normally the miners will keep resetting (turning off) as long as one of the variables is true and with the 'detect change' wont be able to know the correct state that both need to be in to turn things back on.
Thanks for the feedback.

If I understand correctly, your rules looks something like this today.
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Stop miners
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Start miners

Do you think this concept could work?
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Set Var3=true
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Set Var3=false
Rule#3: If Var3=true and Var3 has changed -> Stop miners
Rule#4: If Var3=false and Var3 has changed -> Start miners

This way the actions for Rule#3 and #4 should only run once.
member
Activity: 418
Merit: 21
Hi Patrik,

or anyone who knows this Huh And sorry if this was answered already somewhere, couldn't find it...

Just playing around with the good old Profit Profiles and the Profit Switcher. How does AM knows the second coin to calculate the profit in the Profit Switcher if I can only set the hashrates and wattages? Just as an example: I want to use Gminer to dual mine ERGO (Autolykos 2) and KASPA together, but also solo mine just KASPA, whatever combination is just the highest. The Profit Switcher only shows me the profit of ERGO and the profit of KASPA, but not the profit of ERGO+KASPA. Sorry, but I don't get it... Is this possible with the profit switcher right now? Or do I have to use the Managed Miner and switch it by hand with my profiles?

EDIT: Thanks for the new version and the correction to Rigel! Will test this tomorrow.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Aye... Thanks.

Errr... I don't think the variable change thing really solves the original problem. The problem was it would constantly trigger if conditions were met, not only once when they're first met.

So I have two different variables, and a rule that triggers turning miners off if one variable is true. Then I have another rule when both variables are false that turns things back on. However, if it's setup normally the miners will keep resetting (turning off) as long as one of the variables is true and with the 'detect change' wont be able to know the correct state that both need to be in to turn things back on.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 9.9.3

 ASIC mining
  - Added support for Antminer D9
  - Antminer L7 pause (sleep) and resume supported
 Features
  - New rule action to save current miner hashrate to Profit Profile
  - Check variable trigger can be configured to detect variable changes
 Integrations
  - Added MagicPool.co mining pool
 Changes
  - The total number of temperature values in the miner list has been increased from 20 to 32
  - No automatic cleanup of global variables
 Mining software
  - BzMiner 14.1
  - CpuMiner-Opt 3.22.1
  - Gminer 3.31
  - Lolminer 1.72
  - Miniz Miner 2.0c4
  - Rigel 1.3.10
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.3
  - XmRig 6.19.1
 Corrections
  - Correction for recent TeamBlackMiner API changes
  - Correction to Rigel miner API processing for GPUs
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Is there anyway to setup rules taking precedent over other rules, so if one is active or has been triggered, another that adjusts the same condition wont trigger?
This should be possible to solve using the variable concept. You have a trigger called "Check variable" and an action called "Set variable". The variable can either be set on a global scope or set per miner.

You can design the first rule to set a variable to "1" when running. The second rule could check the variable value and only run if the value is "0". This way you can have one rule to change the behavior of when another rule should run.

Looks like when I restart AM, some of the global variables disappear from tools > rules > variables? Do they automatically show up when rules get called that trigger them or if they aren't there will the program throw a error?

Also how do you get something to trigger once on a variable state change? Seems they're set to constantly repeat. You can set time limit, but that's not applicable nor do I want triggers to run when the variable states don't change.

Thanks
When starting Awesome Miner, all global variables not referenced by any rule will be removed. The original idea was to avoid getting a large number of unused variables but there can be scenarios where this behavior isn't preferred. I will remove the automatic cleanup of global variables in the next release.

If you would reference a variable that doesn't exist it will be considered to have a value of 0 if you read it and it will be created if you write to it.

It's true that the "Check trigger" will run every 5 seconds if the condition is true. Can you combine with "Limit actions to run at most once every" or "Limit actions per day" depending on the behavior you want? Another possibility is to make use of a second variable that you set to "1" in the rule action and you check for it to not be "1" in the trigger condition.



Isn't that just a loop or completely break the automation till it's manually reset?

I saw the run X number of minutes, but when you have a interaction that's semi-random in nature, you can't set something like that up. I think 'on state change' instead of running in a loop would be possible and often times preferable depending on what you're looking for.
I agree that there can be scenarios where a change detection is easiest. I think it will be quite fast to add to the existing Check Variable trigger so you can expect it in the near future.
Pages:
Jump to: