Pages:
Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 13. (Read 703060 times)

newbie
Activity: 107
Merit: 0
Awesome Miner version 9.9.6

 ASIC mining
  - Added support for Antminer HS3
 Features
  - Include ASIC miner fan speed in Awesome Miner API response
 Changes
  - Remove legacy MSI Afterburner integration
 Mining software
  - BzMiner 14.3.2
  - Gminer 3.39
  - Lolminer 1.75
  - Rigel 1.4.6
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.5
  - TeamRedMiner 0.10.12

Hello. After this update, the launch, the restart button and the profit switching do not work.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 9.9.6

 ASIC mining
  - Added support for Antminer HS3
 Features
  - Include ASIC miner fan speed in Awesome Miner API response
 Changes
  - Remove legacy MSI Afterburner integration
 Mining software
  - BzMiner 14.3.2
  - Gminer 3.39
  - Lolminer 1.75
  - Rigel 1.4.6
  - SrbMiner-Multi 2.2.5
  - TeamRedMiner 0.10.12
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, SRBMulti 2.2.5 realised, user now can dual mine Dynex+Radiant, but with AM this is imposible.
In SRBMulti can be defined algorithm, pool, wallet, password values for each involved in mining algorithm separatly. User can multiple times define --algorithm --wallet --password --pool arguments, SRBMulti create a collection and add every similar parameter definition to this collection, but  AM overwrite all definitions with the last value. This made imposible to start dual mining with this method of parameters definition.
I have maqnually created a command string where every algorithm, pool, wallet, etc. was defined with individual --algorithm --pool --wallet parameters and executed over terminal and this allow me to mine in dual mode. But if AM create command line, then only last defined values will be used. Please clear this bug. Regards.
Thanks for your question. I'm not really able to understand this issue: "AM overwrite all definitions with the last value"

If I have a miner with dual configured, where I select one Pool and one Secondary Pool, the command line I get from Awesome Miner is for example:
--algorithm etchash
--pool stratum+tcp://us1-etc.ethermine.org:4444
--wallet
--password x
--algorithm sha512_256d_radiant
--pool stratum+tcp://stratum-eu.rplant.xyz:7086
--wallet
--password x
--api-enable
--api-port 4039

This starts the dual mining perfectly fine. I don't see what kind of parameters that would be overwritten here. Awesome Miner simply adds a second set of algorithm+pool+wallet+password parameters when you enable dual mining.

The example above is without any manually configured command line arguments. Are you using any manual parameters as well?
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, SRBMulti 2.2.5 realised, user now can dual mine Dynex+Radiant, but with AM this is imposible.
In SRBMulti can be defined algorithm, pool, wallet, password values for each involved in mining algorithm separatly. User can multiple times define --algorithm --wallet --password --pool arguments, SRBMulti create a collection and add every similar parameter definition to this collection, but  AM overwrite all definitions with the last value. This made imposible to start dual mining with this method of parameters definition.
I have maqnually created a command string where every algorithm, pool, wallet, etc. was defined with individual --algorithm --pool --wallet parameters and executed over terminal and this allow me to mine in dual mode. But if AM create command line, then only last defined values will be used. Please clear this bug. Regards.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
I've pushed an update for the IronFish calculation. It will automatically be picked up by your Awesome Miner within the next few hours and will resolve the issue.

Everything works correctly
Thanks
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
For the correctness of the profit (like in wattomine), I set the profit factor for the pool 4300000000

I've pushed an update for the IronFish calculation. It will automatically be picked up by your Awesome Miner within the next few hours and will resolve the issue.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
For the correctness of the profit (like in wattomine), I set the profit factor for the pool 4300000000
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Hi all
Have you noticed that ironfish does not calculate profit correctly?
Wattomine gives statistics correctly
What do you think?

3070ti
Electricity at 4 cents
Wattomine - Day   0.000000   0.087446   0.000016   $0.47   $0.14   $0.32

Quote
Overview
=====================================================================================
Pool                                                    ironfish.herominers.com PROP [IronFish (IRON)]
Algorithm                                               IronFish
Pool, Profit factor (1 = 100%)                          1
Coin                                                    IRON
Coins per day                                           1,88440784640985E-11
Difficulty                                              2,74568013478886E+17
Block reward                                            20
Exchange rate (BTC)                                     0,00018055967162298
Current revenue (BTC/GH/day)                            2,64578586276461E-16
Current revenue (BTC/day)                               3,40248061951528E-12

Information at the time of the profit switching decision
=====================================================================================
Profile, Hashrate (H/s)                                 12860000000
Profile, Power (W)                                      104
Electricity price (per kWh)                             0,04468 USD
Power cost (BTC/day)                                    3,79559951030794E-06
Revenue (BTC/day)                                       3,40248061951528E-15
Profit (BTC/day)                                        -3,79559950690546E-06
Profit per day                                          $-0,11
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrik,

GMiner 3.35 added X+Radiant dual mining:
Ergo+Radiant
ETC+Radiant
Conflux+Radiant

Can you please add Radiant to the Dual Mode in the Managed Miner Properties? Thanks!
Hello and thanks for the comments. I've pushed a mining software definition for this.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
BZminer does not close if i run it in admin mode in some cases. Also not with ctrl+c activated in options.

Missing BZminer stats is solved, it was an failure in BZminer API with specific gpu+driver combinations.

Ironfish dual mining options are missing for: Teamredminer, SRBminer, Rigelminer
Also missing dual mining option is alephium for Rigelminer.
Thanks for the feedback. I pushed these mining software definitions yesterday so hopefully you found them by now.

BzMiner has some issue with terminating under certain conditions - I'm trying to figure out exactly when this happens.
member
Activity: 418
Merit: 21
Hi Patrik,

GMiner 3.35 added X+Radiant dual mining:
Ergo+Radiant
ETC+Radiant
Conflux+Radiant

Can you please add Radiant to the Dual Mode in the Managed Miner Properties? Thanks!
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
BZminer does not close if i run it in admin mode in some cases. Also not with ctrl+c activated in options.

Missing BZminer stats is solved, it was an failure in BZminer API with specific gpu+driver combinations.

Ironfish dual mining options are missing for: Teamredminer, SRBminer, Rigelminer
Also missing dual mining option is alephium for Rigelminer.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 9.9.5

 ASIC mining
  - Goldshell integration improved with LED flash and change web password
 GPU mining
  - Improved detection of more recent CUDA versions
 Features
  - Miner Property trigger can be configured to trigger on the current mining algorithm
  - Improved firmware version trigger to also detect firmware date on Bitmain firmware
  - Improve Time trigger to support month of year expressions like 11-04, for November to April
 Mining software
  - BzMiner 14.3
  - CpuMiner-Opt 3.22.2
  - Gminer 3.34
  - Lolminer 1.74
  - Miniz Miner 2.0c5
  - Rigel 1.4.4
  - OneZeroMiner 1.1.0
  - TeamBlackMiner 1.94
  - TeamRedMiner 0.10.11
 Corrections
  - Correction to device list for OneZeroMiner
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
It seems as though there is a bug with the Time Rule Trigger. If you select a month range that is lets say late in the year till the next year, it doesn't properly read it. Like 10-04, so from Oct to April. It works fine in the opposite direction. So 1-8 or 4-12, but not 5-1 or whatever range you want that moves across the year till next year.
Good point. I will make sure the next release will support 10-04 and similar expressions. Like you noticed it isn't supported today.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, can you please add a rule triger for mining algoritm. I want realise logic, when specifed algo will be choosed from profit switching, the specified profit profile must be also choosed. Regards.
In the next release you will find "Algorithm" as one of the properties in the "Miner Property" trigger.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
It seems as though there is a bug with the Time Rule Trigger. If you select a month range that is lets say late in the year till the next year, it doesn't properly read it. Like 10-04, so from Oct to April. It works fine in the opposite direction. So 1-8 or 4-12, but not 5-1 or whatever range you want that moves across the year till next year.
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, can you please add a rule triger for mining algoritm. I want realise logic, when specifed algo will be choosed from profit switching, the specified profit profile must be also choosed. Regards.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi patrike,

i see no stats (no hashrate, nothing in gpu tab, no shares.....) when i use Bzminer. Here is the API report

API command: /status
{"method":"fullstatus","rig_name":"test","bzminer_version":"BzMiner/v14.1.1","os_name":"Windows","architecture":"x64","used_memory":3923.15015625,"total_memory":32692.91796875,"used_storage":88629.59375,"total_storage":228319.99609375,"cuda_driver_version":0,"opencl_driver_version":0,"processor_count":24,"cpu_usage":1.0,"cpu_name":"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor            ","hdd_name":"Intenso SSD Sata III","ram_name":"Unknown","uptime":"3:12:12:25","uptime_s":303145,"intensity":1013777312,"http_address":"0.0.0.0","http_port":4030,"http_enabled":true,"logfile":"","nvidia_only":false,"amd_only":false,"launch_on_boot":false,"verbosity":2,"update_frequency":15000,"lock_config":false,"watchdog_restarts":0,"watchdog_enabled":true,"pools":[{"id":0,"algorithm":"radiant","wallet":"xxxxxxxxxx","url":["pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3122"],"username":"290","lhr_only":false,"test":false,"test_diff":1,"test_iteration_ms":120000,"max_connection_retries":0,"delay_before_connection_retry":3000,"current_url":"pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3122","status":-1589992416,"message":"","uptime":"3:4:40","uptime_s":276054,"epoch":0,"block":-1,"difficulty":34360262664.0,"pending_solutions":1,"valid_solutions":1230,"invalid_solutions":0,"rejected_solutions":9,"total_solutions":1230,"stale_solutions":0,"average":0.26733899889152126,"accepted_avg_seconds":224.33170731707319,"power":7.9496286016e-312,"hashrate":147174016.0,"average_latency":104},{"id":1,"algorithm":"zil","wallet":"xxxxxxxxxxxxx","url":["zmp://zil.flexpool.io"],"username":"test","lhr_only":false,"test":false,"test_diff":1,"test_iteration_ms":300000,"max_connection_retries":0,"delay_before_connection_retry":3000,"current_url":"zmp://zil.flexpool.io","status":-1589992416,"message":"","uptime":"3:12:12","uptime_s":303142,"epoch":0,"block":27986,"difficulty":1073725440.0,"pending_solutions":1,"valid_solutions":103,"invalid_solutions":0,"rejected_solutions":4,"total_solutions":103,"stale_solutions":0,"average":0.02038648554142943,"accepted_avg_seconds":2874.9417475728157,"power":7.94962861836e-312,"hashrate":0.0,"average_latency":2294250}],"devices":[{"name":"AMD Radeon R9 200 Series","index":3900,"uid":"39:0","cuda":false,"pci_bus_id":39,"pci_device_id":0,"vendor":2,"device_id":"0x67B11002","subsystem_id":"0x92951682","lhr":false,"pool":[0,1],"hashrate":[147174016.0,0.0],"efficiency":[   *it look like here is something missing*


http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  60
  false
  0
 
    303149
    0
    0
    0

It look like the API report is not complete, maybe that is the reason for no stats?

Hi,
Yes, that API response is broken and this cannot be resolved from an Awesome Miner point of view.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi patrike,

i see no stats (no hashrate, nothing in gpu tab, no shares.....) when i use Bzminer. Here is the API report

API command: /status
{"method":"fullstatus","rig_name":"test","bzminer_version":"BzMiner/v14.1.1","os_name":"Windows","architecture":"x64","used_memory":3923.15015625,"total_memory":32692.91796875,"used_storage":88629.59375,"total_storage":228319.99609375,"cuda_driver_version":0,"opencl_driver_version":0,"processor_count":24,"cpu_usage":1.0,"cpu_name":"AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor            ","hdd_name":"Intenso SSD Sata III","ram_name":"Unknown","uptime":"3:12:12:25","uptime_s":303145,"intensity":1013777312,"http_address":"0.0.0.0","http_port":4030,"http_enabled":true,"logfile":"","nvidia_only":false,"amd_only":false,"launch_on_boot":false,"verbosity":2,"update_frequency":15000,"lock_config":false,"watchdog_restarts":0,"watchdog_enabled":true,"pools":[{"id":0,"algorithm":"radiant","wallet":"xxxxxxxxxx","url":["pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3122"],"username":"290","lhr_only":false,"test":false,"test_diff":1,"test_iteration_ms":120000,"max_connection_retries":0,"delay_before_connection_retry":3000,"current_url":"pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3122","status":-1589992416,"message":"","uptime":"3:4:40","uptime_s":276054,"epoch":0,"block":-1,"difficulty":34360262664.0,"pending_solutions":1,"valid_solutions":1230,"invalid_solutions":0,"rejected_solutions":9,"total_solutions":1230,"stale_solutions":0,"average":0.26733899889152126,"accepted_avg_seconds":224.33170731707319,"power":7.9496286016e-312,"hashrate":147174016.0,"average_latency":104},{"id":1,"algorithm":"zil","wallet":"xxxxxxxxxxxxx","url":["zmp://zil.flexpool.io"],"username":"test","lhr_only":false,"test":false,"test_diff":1,"test_iteration_ms":300000,"max_connection_retries":0,"delay_before_connection_retry":3000,"current_url":"zmp://zil.flexpool.io","status":-1589992416,"message":"","uptime":"3:12:12","uptime_s":303142,"epoch":0,"block":27986,"difficulty":1073725440.0,"pending_solutions":1,"valid_solutions":103,"invalid_solutions":0,"rejected_solutions":4,"total_solutions":103,"stale_solutions":0,"average":0.02038648554142943,"accepted_avg_seconds":2874.9417475728157,"power":7.94962861836e-312,"hashrate":0.0,"average_latency":2294250}],"devices":[{"name":"AMD Radeon R9 200 Series","index":3900,"uid":"39:0","cuda":false,"pci_bus_id":39,"pci_device_id":0,"vendor":2,"device_id":"0x67B11002","subsystem_id":"0x92951682","lhr":false,"pool":[0,1],"hashrate":[147174016.0,0.0],"efficiency":[   *it look like here is something missing*


http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  60
  false
  0
 
    303149
    0
    0
    0

It look like the API report is not complete, maybe that is the reason for no stats?






 
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Aye... Thanks.

Errr... I don't think the variable change thing really solves the original problem. The problem was it would constantly trigger if conditions were met, not only once when they're first met.

So I have two different variables, and a rule that triggers turning miners off if one variable is true. Then I have another rule when both variables are false that turns things back on. However, if it's setup normally the miners will keep resetting (turning off) as long as one of the variables is true and with the 'detect change' wont be able to know the correct state that both need to be in to turn things back on.
Thanks for the feedback.

If I understand correctly, your rules looks something like this today.
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Stop miners
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Start miners

Do you think this concept could work?
Rule#1: If Var1=true or Var2=true -> Set Var3=true
Rule#2: If Var1=false and Var2=false -> Set Var3=false
Rule#3: If Var3=true and Var3 has changed -> Stop miners
Rule#4: If Var3=false and Var3 has changed -> Start miners

This way the actions for Rule#3 and #4 should only run once.

This does work, I feel as though the 'detect change' or 'comparison' should instead be checkboxes, instead of radial buttons and could eliminate this, while being more intuitive and simplistic. So it could do both in one or either/or.

I don't know if you can do anything about the rulespam, but the comparison activates every 6s and keeps hitting the logs, which buries anything of value.
Thanks for the feedback.

Is it entries in the Awesome Miner log file you are referring to? I did find a few related to triggers but not many. Can you give an example and I will look into it in more detail? Thanks!

Tools > Rule History

Maybe it's not a normal log that gets saved, however with variable triggers it only keeps about a hour worth of data before it gets pushed out due to the variable activating every 6s.
Pages:
Jump to: