Pages:
Author

Topic: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners - page 63. (Read 703113 times)

full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
I am using linux.

I want to know if it is possible to mine ETH and RVN on my rig at the same time.

The ideia is to Mine ETH with 8gb cards and RVN on my 4GB cards, is it possible on a single rig using AM?
You can configure a Managed Miner to only make use of specific GPUs. If you setup two Managed Miners, you can have one for ETH and another one for RVN.

In the Properties of the Managed Miner, you will find the "GPU selection", where you select the GPUs to use.

Tks,

I had tryed this way, but for some reason (at least on linux) AM get lost to select the GPU's.

Example:
I have i rig and 2 GPU's
On miner 1: select GPU 0 (Temredminer - ETH)
On miner 2: select GPU 1 (Temredminer - RVN)

When start the miner 1, it starts ok!
When start the miner 2, it trys to use the same GPU that is already used on miner 2 and gets 511 temp.

I will do more tests on my miners, maybe it is a rig problem....

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
I am using linux.

I want to know if it is possible to mine ETH and RVN on my rig at the same time.

The ideia is to Mine ETH with 8gb cards and RVN on my 4GB cards, is it possible on a single rig using AM?
You can configure a Managed Miner to only make use of specific GPUs. If you setup two Managed Miners, you can have one for ETH and another one for RVN.

In the Properties of the Managed Miner, you will find the "GPU selection", where you select the GPUs to use.
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
I am using linux.

I want to know if it is possible to mine ETH and RVN on my rig at the same time.

The ideia is to Mine ETH with 8gb cards and RVN on my 4GB cards, is it possible on a single rig using AM?
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, i try to realise scenario with rules where after mining start and after 30 sec. for the selected miner will be applyed other clocking profile (increasing of memory clock)
With trigers what AM now have, this is imposible. AM not have a "countdown timer" triger, which can be started only one time. And next feature, what can be very useful for rules is some predefined action to check what a algo will be mined at the moment.
With all this suggestion, user can realise a functionality like in RaveOS now, where overclocking can be changed after miner start and after specific time.
New 3060TI GPU allow stable mining with much bigger memory overclocking as starting values, but increasing of clock speed must be done in small steps after miner start.
Regards and best wiches in New Year.


You can set a time to wait in rules in the action section. So set 1. action wait 30 sec and 2. action apply gpu oc profile.
And you can also set the trigger Mining uptime greather than 2min for example. There are many more ways, but not so user friendly like in HiveOS or RavenOS.

So I am agree it is much better to set the Apply GPU OC Profile per miner in the GPU OC Profile section maybe.
Thanks for all the comments.

Today the "GPU Clocking Profiles" section of a Managed Miner only allow you to select the GPU clocking profile to apply, but it will be applied right away. Is it here (in the Properties of the miner) it would make sense to add a delay option - to let you apply the profile after 30 seconds for example?
Yes, this is a good idea, to improve miner properties object and add second (maybe third too) overclocking step. But important to add a functionality, which test what a algo will be mined at the moment. This increasing of memory clock is important for Ethash algo, Not tested with other algos.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike, i try to realise scenario with rules where after mining start and after 30 sec. for the selected miner will be applyed other clocking profile (increasing of memory clock)
With trigers what AM now have, this is imposible. AM not have a "countdown timer" triger, which can be started only one time. And next feature, what can be very useful for rules is some predefined action to check what a algo will be mined at the moment.
With all this suggestion, user can realise a functionality like in RaveOS now, where overclocking can be changed after miner start and after specific time.
New 3060TI GPU allow stable mining with much bigger memory overclocking as starting values, but increasing of clock speed must be done in small steps after miner start.
Regards and best wiches in New Year.


You can set a time to wait in rules in the action section. So set 1. action wait 30 sec and 2. action apply gpu oc profile.
And you can also set the trigger Mining uptime greather than 2min for example. There are many more ways, but not so user friendly like in HiveOS or RavenOS.

So I am agree it is much better to set the Apply GPU OC Profile per miner in the GPU OC Profile section maybe.
Thanks for all the comments.

Today the "GPU Clocking Profiles" section of a Managed Miner only allow you to select the GPU clocking profile to apply, but it will be applied right away. Is it here (in the Properties of the miner) it would make sense to add a delay option - to let you apply the profile after 30 seconds for example?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094


@patrike

Please consider these features for Cloud interface:

1. Increase number of coins/algorithms shown on Dashboard. Currently it shows max of 8.
2. Show coins/day on Miners page.

Thanks
Thanks for the feedback. I've noted these good points.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike, i try to realise scenario with rules where after mining start and after 30 sec. for the selected miner will be applyed other clocking profile (increasing of memory clock)
With trigers what AM now have, this is imposible. AM not have a "countdown timer" triger, which can be started only one time. And next feature, what can be very useful for rules is some predefined action to check what a algo will be mined at the moment.
With all this suggestion, user can realise a functionality like in RaveOS now, where overclocking can be changed after miner start and after specific time.
New 3060TI GPU allow stable mining with much bigger memory overclocking as starting values, but increasing of clock speed must be done in small steps after miner start.
Regards and best wiches in New Year.


You can set a time to wait in rules in the action section. So set 1. action wait 30 sec and 2. action apply gpu oc profile.
And you can also set the trigger Mining uptime greather than 2min for example. There are many more ways, but not so user friendly like in HiveOS or RavenOS.

So I am agree it is much better to set the Apply GPU OC Profile per miner in the GPU OC Profile section maybe.
legendary
Activity: 1753
Merit: 1007
Hi Patrike, i try to realise scenario with rules where after mining start and after 30 sec. for the selected miner will be applyed other clocking profile (increasing of memory clock)
With trigers what AM now have, this is imposible. AM not have a "countdown timer" triger, which can be started only one time. And next feature, what can be very useful for rules is some predefined action to check what a algo will be mined at the moment.
With all this suggestion, user can realise a functionality like in RaveOS now, where overclocking can be changed after miner start and after specific time.
New 3060TI GPU allow stable mining with much bigger memory overclocking as starting values, but increasing of clock speed must be done in small steps after miner start.
Regards and best wiches in New Year.
member
Activity: 531
Merit: 29


@patrike

Please consider these features for Cloud interface:

1. Increase number of coins/algorithms shown on Dashboard. Currently it shows max of 8.
2. Show coins/day on Miners page.

Thanks
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
I have a rig that loses a card every week or so and needs to be rebooted , why doe the miner keep mining even when watchdog fails with 1 card down

do i have to benchmark it to force it to reboot ?
Thanks for your question.
The exact behavior will depend on the mining software you are running. Some of them will stop mining if they consider a GPU to not be working.

What you can do from an Awesome Miner point of view is to configure a rule with a trigger called "Device Count". If you have the same number of GPU's in all mining rigs, you can specify to trigger when below a specific number.

In case the number of GPU's are different per miner - each miner can be configured with the expected number of devices in the Managed Miner Properties, Advanced section. The trigger can be configured to compare with the expected number of devices configured on the Managed Miner.

The rule action can be set to "Miner command" where you can select Reboot.
thanks for reply the rule won't work beace the card stays active but is mining at 0 , I'll look into the mining software option I can only use phoniex and I don't know the settings for that
thanks
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
I have a rig that loses a card every week or so and needs to be rebooted , why doe the miner keep mining even when watchdog fails with 1 card down

do i have to benchmark it to force it to reboot ?
Thanks for your question.
The exact behavior will depend on the mining software you are running. Some of them will stop mining if they consider a GPU to not be working.

What you can do from an Awesome Miner point of view is to configure a rule with a trigger called "Device Count". If you have the same number of GPU's in all mining rigs, you can specify to trigger when below a specific number.

In case the number of GPU's are different per miner - each miner can be configured with the expected number of devices in the Managed Miner Properties, Advanced section. The trigger can be configured to compare with the expected number of devices configured on the Managed Miner.

The rule action can be set to "Miner command" where you can select Reboot.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 132
I have a rig that loses a card every week or so and needs to be rebooted , why doe the miner keep mining even when watchdog fails with 1 card down

do i have to benchmark it to force it to reboot ?
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike

1) Several versions ago I could reset the ignored pools from the right click >> view details.
Today I had Internet loss for 10 hours and after become online my rig could not connect the pool (there was an error message about "there are no available pools for mining" or something similar), but this time I could not reset ignored pools as before. Please, add this function back.

2) Several pools have the servers in different countries (Europe, USA, others). Can you make selected country as primary pool and the other countries as secondary for the cases when the primary pool fails?

3) Can you add an option to ban the pool from the "online services" tab? For example "disable for 30 min/1 hour/or selected time interval"? Sometimes pool owners asks for some time to repair the problems with their pools and this function can help not to do useless switches.
Thanks for the feedback.
1 and 3) Please select the miner and go to the "Profit switching" tab at the bottom of the screen. In this tab you can both "Reset failed and ignored pools" and also ignore a pool for a specific time interval, similar to what you suggested.

I understand that ignore a pool directly from the Online Services tab would be better, as it would apply for all miners. I've noted your request.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Hi Patrike

1) Several versions ago I could reset the ignored pools from the right click >> view details.
Today I had Internet loss for 10 hours and after become online my rig could not connect the pool (there was an error message about "there are no available pools for mining" or something similar), but this time I could not reset ignored pools as before. Please, add this function back.

2) Several pools have the servers in different countries (Europe, USA, others). Can you make selected country as primary pool and the other countries as secondary for the cases when the primary pool fails?

3) Can you add an option to ban the pool from the "online services" tab? For example "disable for 30 min/1 hour/or selected time interval"? Sometimes pool owners asks for some time to repair the problems with their pools and this function can help not to do useless switches.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike,

here is a screenshot:

You see the balance is completly wrong calculated, but not all the the time, sometimes it is correct. No new bug, this is happens since pool balance update.


Thanks Patrike for the new update, the graph is a new update i have been waiting for, i love it. helpful to find some failures and so on. Do you plan to improve this feature in the future? I have some ideas  Cheesy
And maybe a graph for diff, price and hashrate from coins in the coinstab.


I also have problem with temp reading of my Antminer T17 with custom firmware, but temps show in same way as the original firmware.
Thanks for the screenshot. I will try to reproduce this.

Thanks for the feedback on the graph as well. Next I think there will be revenue and profit as well. Thanks for the suggestion about coin graphs as well.

Can you please send me the API Report for this Antminer (via PM or mail)? Please also let me know the name of the firmware. Even if the API is compatible with Antminer T17, it might be that this miner identifies it differently, and then Awesome Miner doesn't process it like an Antminer T17 with Bitmain firmware.

Sure i will send via PM later. Software is from Asicfw, i think you know this software  Cheesy

Timestamps in the graph would be nice, if we go with the cursor over the graph to see hashrate, time, temp. Or the option to see every single gpu/device with its own temp and hashrate.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike,

here is a screenshot:

You see the balance is completly wrong calculated, but not all the the time, sometimes it is correct. No new bug, this is happens since pool balance update.


Thanks Patrike for the new update, the graph is a new update i have been waiting for, i love it. helpful to find some failures and so on. Do you plan to improve this feature in the future? I have some ideas  Cheesy
And maybe a graph for diff, price and hashrate from coins in the coinstab.


I also have problem with temp reading of my Antminer T17 with custom firmware, but temps show in same way as the original firmware.
Thanks for the screenshot. I will try to reproduce this.

Thanks for the feedback on the graph as well. Next I think there will be revenue and profit as well. Thanks for the suggestion about coin graphs as well.

Can you please send me the API Report for this Antminer (via PM or mail)? Please also let me know the name of the firmware. Even if the API is compatible with Antminer T17, it might be that this miner identifies it differently, and then Awesome Miner doesn't process it like an Antminer T17 with Bitmain firmware.
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike,

i have many problems with new mining software, the download needs to much time. If i download normal in browser it needs 1 sec, if i start to download it over AM, it needs up to 1 hour sometimes to start it again. Mostly at srbminer multi, T-Rex or Teamredminer for me. But this happens sometimes, not every time i tried. So i can´t reproduce this  Huh
Hi,
Can you please check the Remote Agent log file and verify that it's the actual download operation that takes time, or something else?
When a download is initiated you will see "Downloading file". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:31.691 [008] []Downloading file: https://github.com/trexminer/T-Rex/releases/download/0.19.3/t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip?u=67792375

As you can see, Remote Agent adds a random parameter (?u=67792375) to the URL, to prevent any caching. If you make a download speed test via the web browser to compare the speed, please add something similar to avoid caching.

When a download has completed, you will see "Download done". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:42.238 [008] []Download done: C:\Users\test\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip

In this example it was a 10.5 second download for 22MB. Do you see very a very long duration between these two log lines?

What I can see from time to time is when a new mining software version is released, it typically results in slower download speeds when many users are hitting the Github download sources.

Hi Patrike,

if i checked many scenarios and i add random parameter to my download in browser. Sometimes it download normal and sometimes it slowdown to 1kb/s. But i think this is problem with github or other hosters. So i think all ok at the moment.


Can you take a look in Nanominer and verushash? Can you add it to the standard definition. I added it manually, but i can´t see cpu temp, hashrate is only show in performance colume, nothing in cpu or gpu tab. And W/h is not shown for CPU and Nanominer.

Another bug:

Poolbalance Nanopool XMR -> Balance 0,66 xmr -> Balance in Euro 116000€ for example

I think there is a problem in calculating the right Balance in €/$. But sometimes, it show the real Balance in €/$.
Thanks for all feedback.

I've added Nanominer VerusHash and also made sure it's correctly reported for CPU mining. The API doesn't report per-core hashrate, so it will show up as a single CPU device. You will be able to see the temperature. This will be in included in the next release, planned for tomorrow.

I wasn't able to reproduce the balance issue. Is it the top level "Nanopool" line where it's incorrect or is it also incorrect if you expand the sub nodes and look at each wallet address?

Hi Patrike,

here is a screenshot:



You see the balance is completly wrong calculated, but not all the the time, sometimes it is correct. No new bug, this is happens since pool balance update.


Thanks Patrike for the new update, the graph is a new update i have been waiting for, i love it. helpful to find some failures and so on. Do you plan to improve this feature in the future? I have some ideas  Cheesy
And maybe a graph for diff, price and hashrate from coins in the coinstab.


I also have problem with temp reading of my Antminer T17 with custom firmware, but temps show in same way as the original firmware.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Awesome Miner version 8.1.14 (Development preview of 8.2)

 Features
  - Show hashrate and temperature graph in the details panel for the selected miner
  - Introducing the concept of Quick Access Toolbar, where you can right click on almost any toolbar button or sub menu item in the main window and add it to the Quick Access Toolbar. The command will show up as a separate button in the top left corner of the main window.
  - The highlight colors currently named "Information #1", "Information #2" and so on can be given a user defined description. To define a description, use the 'Rename' menu item in the Highlight Miners or Highlight Groups toolbar buttons.
  - The Information column can be configured to display the hashrate of each individual device for a miner
  - The profit switching setting for minimum time to say on a pool can now be configured for up to 999 minutes.
 Mining software
  - TeamRedMiner 0.7.21
  - Lolminer 1.17
  - Gminer 2.35
  - CpuMiner-Opt 3.15.4
 Corrections
  - Correction to the link to the Nicehash web site
  - Correction to Nanominer VerusHash device reporting
  - Correction to AMD RX 5000 series overclocking on Linux
  - Changed timeout for reboot of Antminer S19

To get access to development versions, open the Options dialog in Awesome Miner. In the General section, enable Check for development versions. Then go to the Menu and click Check for updates
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1094
Hi Patrike,

i have many problems with new mining software, the download needs to much time. If i download normal in browser it needs 1 sec, if i start to download it over AM, it needs up to 1 hour sometimes to start it again. Mostly at srbminer multi, T-Rex or Teamredminer for me. But this happens sometimes, not every time i tried. So i can´t reproduce this  Huh
Hi,
Can you please check the Remote Agent log file and verify that it's the actual download operation that takes time, or something else?
When a download is initiated you will see "Downloading file". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:31.691 [008] []Downloading file: https://github.com/trexminer/T-Rex/releases/download/0.19.3/t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip?u=67792375

As you can see, Remote Agent adds a random parameter (?u=67792375) to the URL, to prevent any caching. If you make a download speed test via the web browser to compare the speed, please add something similar to avoid caching.

When a download has completed, you will see "Download done". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:42.238 [008] []Download done: C:\Users\test\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip

In this example it was a 10.5 second download for 22MB. Do you see very a very long duration between these two log lines?

What I can see from time to time is when a new mining software version is released, it typically results in slower download speeds when many users are hitting the Github download sources.

Hi Patrike,

if i checked many scenarios and i add random parameter to my download in browser. Sometimes it download normal and sometimes it slowdown to 1kb/s. But i think this is problem with github or other hosters. So i think all ok at the moment.


Can you take a look in Nanominer and verushash? Can you add it to the standard definition. I added it manually, but i can´t see cpu temp, hashrate is only show in performance colume, nothing in cpu or gpu tab. And W/h is not shown for CPU and Nanominer.

Another bug:

Poolbalance Nanopool XMR -> Balance 0,66 xmr -> Balance in Euro 116000€ for example

I think there is a problem in calculating the right Balance in €/$. But sometimes, it show the real Balance in €/$.
Thanks for all feedback.

I've added Nanominer VerusHash and also made sure it's correctly reported for CPU mining. The API doesn't report per-core hashrate, so it will show up as a single CPU device. You will be able to see the temperature. This will be in included in the next release, planned for tomorrow.

I wasn't able to reproduce the balance issue. Is it the top level "Nanopool" line where it's incorrect or is it also incorrect if you expand the sub nodes and look at each wallet address?
member
Activity: 1558
Merit: 69
Hi Patrike,

i have many problems with new mining software, the download needs to much time. If i download normal in browser it needs 1 sec, if i start to download it over AM, it needs up to 1 hour sometimes to start it again. Mostly at srbminer multi, T-Rex or Teamredminer for me. But this happens sometimes, not every time i tried. So i can´t reproduce this  Huh
Hi,
Can you please check the Remote Agent log file and verify that it's the actual download operation that takes time, or something else?
When a download is initiated you will see "Downloading file". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:31.691 [008] []Downloading file: https://github.com/trexminer/T-Rex/releases/download/0.19.3/t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip?u=67792375

As you can see, Remote Agent adds a random parameter (?u=67792375) to the URL, to prevent any caching. If you make a download speed test via the web browser to compare the speed, please add something similar to avoid caching.

When a download has completed, you will see "Download done". Example:
2020-12-11 10:39:42.238 [008] []Download done: C:\Users\test\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\t-rex-0.19.3-win-cuda11.1.zip

In this example it was a 10.5 second download for 22MB. Do you see very a very long duration between these two log lines?

What I can see from time to time is when a new mining software version is released, it typically results in slower download speeds when many users are hitting the Github download sources.

Hi Patrike,

if i checked many scenarios and i add random parameter to my download in browser. Sometimes it download normal and sometimes it slowdown to 1kb/s. But i think this is problem with github or other hosters. So i think all ok at the moment.


Can you take a look in Nanominer and verushash? Can you add it to the standard definition. I added it manually, but i can´t see cpu temp, hashrate is only show in performance colume, nothing in cpu or gpu tab. And W/h is not shown for CPU and Nanominer.

Another bug:

Poolbalance Nanopool XMR -> Balance 0,66 xmr -> Balance in Euro 116000€ for example

I think there is a problem in calculating the right Balance in €/$. But sometimes, it show the real Balance in €/$.
Pages:
Jump to: