Lol, users of this wallet will be mining bitcoins and sending them to dev, while he will be sending axio coins for you in return.
Yeah total scam, website reminds me of honorcoin. I am avoiding this 100%.
Topic: Axiocoin: Unique Miner - No ASIC/Multipool - Donating@Home - JUST LAUNCHED - page 28. (Read 16143 times)
June 29, 2014, 03:29:09 PM
Yeah total scam, website reminds me of honorcoin. I am avoiding this 100%.
June 29, 2014, 03:27:45 PM
Lol, users of this wallet will be mining bitcoins and sending them to dev, while he will be sending axio coins for you in return.
Yes and this money will be publicly monitored by users.
50% gets donated
http://axiocoin.org/vote.html
50% goes towards exchanges, marketplaces, and buy support
Both of these Bitcoin addresses will be made public.
June 29, 2014, 03:21:52 PM
Lol, users of this wallet will be mining bitcoins and sending them to dev, while he will be sending axio coins for you in return.
June 29, 2014, 03:13:39 PM
So hidden.How do you ensure not using miners' hash to mine other coins?
That's the point. The money made (in BTC) will be split 50/50 between donating and for sustaining the growth of the economy (section about this in the thread). Not only will we be giving back, we'll be getting Axio on exchanges/marketplaces. We also plan on putting a hefty amount of profits onto exchanges as buy support to keep the coin strong against dumpers.
Our miner application calculates how much you're mining and sends you the appropriate amount of Axiocoin to your Axio wallet.
June 29, 2014, 02:57:37 PM
So hidden.How do you ensure not using miners' hash to mine other coins?
June 29, 2014, 02:23:23 PM
Is the miner and wallet closed source?
The wallet and coin is entirely open sourced.
Our miner makes several connections to our servers, open sourcing this is very risky. We've took steps to ensure security by obfuscating & virtualizing sensitive components of the miner code.
June 29, 2014, 02:15:24 PM
Is the miner and wallet closed source?
June 29, 2014, 02:06:39 PM
June 29, 2014, 01:49:40 PM
well, theres 3 answer for this question if i may answer it
1. its not launch yet
2. the domain is broken
3. that site are joke << really?
======================================
well i think that 100m is to much
From thread:
"Note: The website should be live for all in about 24 hours. On the site you'll be able to vote for charities through our Donating@Home platform."
Site is currently live for me. Concerning max supply, that doesn't matter much. We've seen plenty successful coins in the 50-100 Billion range.
In my opinion, 100m is a solid figure.
To get more interest and price appreciation. I'd suggest you lower the coin count. There are very few coins that are successful when talking billions. I'd suggest a max of 50 million coins. Ideally 10-25 million or less. If you did 5 million, There would be great interest..
Regards,
Brian
Price per coin would be higher but that in no way means the price will rise faster.
June 29, 2014, 01:29:45 PM
well, theres 3 answer for this question if i may answer it
1. its not launch yet
2. the domain is broken
3. that site are joke << really?
======================================
well i think that 100m is to much
From thread:
"Note: The website should be live for all in about 24 hours. On the site you'll be able to vote for charities through our Donating@Home platform."
Site is currently live for me. Concerning max supply, that doesn't matter much. We've seen plenty successful coins in the 50-100 Billion range.
In my opinion, 100m is a solid figure.
To get more interest and price appreciation. I'd suggest you lower the coin count. There are very few coins that are successful when talking billions. I'd suggest a max of 50 million coins. Ideally 10-25 million or less. If you did 5 million, There would be great interest..
Regards,
Brian
June 29, 2014, 01:19:43 PM
interesting idea maybe..
Thank you it's definitely unique.
June 29, 2014, 12:33:58 PM
Not nearly sufficient info. Its impossible to move a physical window of an exe by exactly one pixel by hand. How did you make the GIF with screenshots? My assumption, if you are telling the truth, is that the multiple screenshots are different layers in Photoshop and you nudged one of them by mistake before cropping it for export. Anyway, I'm not removing my post. If your explanation is good enough, people should have no problem. I just point out what I see and suspect.
I understand. If you look closely at the gif you'll see that between the movement is black. At the recent screenshot I posted (with the folder and miner) you'll see my desktop background is black (yes I'm that dull). The method I used to screenshot the miner was by hand (snipping tool).
This is a screenshot with extra bad aim
http://puu.sh/9Pnmi/2bd4c8ea6c.png
The GIF was made in photoshop using 3 different screenshots of the miner.
June 29, 2014, 12:24:50 PM
I think the first photoshop layer was mistakenly moved a pixel to the side in your "non photoshopped" GUI front end or whatever you wanna call it. See it jumping around in the GIF? And its not multiple screenshots because the contents inside the frame is moving, while the right edge is getting cropped by moving away from the work area in photoshop 
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
I figured someone would come to this conclusion by mistake. Just to clarify, there is no IPO or premine associated with this coin.
On to the gif. I screen-shotted the miner from my desktop. Unfortunately, I do not have perfect aim.
Please edit your post if you find this to be sufficient information. Thank you.
Not nearly sufficient info. Its impossible to move a physical window of an exe by exactly one pixel by hand. How did you make the GIF with screenshots? My assumption, if you are telling the truth, is that the multiple screenshots are different layers in Photoshop and you nudged one of them by mistake before cropping it for export. Anyway, I'm not removing my post. If your explanation is good enough, people should have no problem. I just point out what I see and suspect.
June 29, 2014, 12:20:05 PM
well, theres 3 answer for this question if i may answer it
1. its not launch yet
2. the domain is broken
3. that site are joke << really?
======================================
well i think that 100m is to much
From thread:
"Note: The website should be live for all in about 24 hours. On the site you'll be able to vote for charities through our Donating@Home platform."
Site is currently live for me. Concerning max supply, that doesn't matter much. We've seen plenty successful coins in the 50-100 Billion range.
In my opinion, 100m is a solid figure.
June 29, 2014, 11:58:56 AM
What is theoretical scrypt?
That information is in the thread. Think of it as also being a white paper
June 29, 2014, 11:41:25 AM
"Countdown posted when this date is confirmed"
We're either releasing on the 6th or the 11th.
June 29, 2014, 11:27:21 AM
June 29, 2014, 11:21:13 AM
I think the first photoshop layer was mistakenly moved a pixel to the side in your "non photoshopped" GUI front end or whatever you wanna call it. See it jumping around in the GIF? And its not multiple screenshots because the contents inside the frame is moving, while the right edge is getting cropped by moving away from the work area in photoshop
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
http://i.imgur.com/fR1rBiR.gif
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
http://i.imgur.com/fR1rBiR.gif
I figured someone would come to this conclusion by mistake. Just to clarify, there is no IPO or premine associated with this coin.
On to the gif. I screen-shotted the miner from my desktop. Unfortunately, I do not have perfect aim.
http://puu.sh/9PjdR/9d13a7b2cf.png
Please edit your post if you find this to be sufficient information. Thank you.
June 29, 2014, 11:17:10 AM
I think the first photoshop layer was mistakenly moved a pixel to the side in your "non photoshopped" GUI front end or whatever you wanna call it. See it jumping around in the GIF? And its not multiple screenshots because the contents inside the frame is moving, while the right edge is getting cropped by moving away from the work area in photoshop
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
Nice try though... almost had it there... learn to spot the details before getting into teh scam bandwagon
June 29, 2014, 11:16:40 AM
Anyway scrypt mining is hot for gpu in summer.
Great coin, except one thing it may be its flaw: it is scrypt.
and in this hot summer many would avoid it.
and in this hot summer many would avoid it.
Great coin, except one thing it may be its flaw: it is scrypt.
and in this hot summer many would avoid it.
and in this hot summer many would avoid it.
I would also agree, its not good to mine scrypt in summer especially here where temp outside goes up to 40 Celsius, maybe you shoud consider x11
Thanks for pointing this out. I don't believe this will be a massive issue, but our team will for sure be integrating X11 and Scrypt-N mining.
In case you didn't read, you'll actually be mining on a multipool so we'll definitely be able to integrate other algos soon after launch.
Sorry didn't quite read the op had some issue on my phone i just read the comment where the user said it would be scrypt
Jump to: