Topic: [banned mixer] - Premium Bitcoin Mixer | Launched in 2018 🛡️ - page 6. (Read 25163 times)

Last one is looking better than others, however I wouldn't pick any of them for Mixtum avatars, but in general idea of using avatar characters is not bad.
Maybe you could go with small modification of using masked hero characters like Zorro, Vendetta, Darth Vader, Batman, Flash, Spiderman, imagined Satoshi, etc.
You don't have to use exact characters I mentioned, but I think you get the idea what I wanted to say.

15 Greatest Masked Superheroes:
https://fictionhorizon.com/greatest-masked-superheroes-ranked/

If I may share my opinion, I would rather suggest you to try something more related to the service activity -- which is BTC mixing. Maybe create some avatars with small guys with anonymous faces (maybe having faces similar to this one or faces wearing Guy Fawkes masks) which are holding mixers, blenders or kitchen mixing tools in their hands?

I, for one, don't see any connection between the avatars from the above section and the service itself...

I know, it may be a difficult work, but I am sure that such avatars would be appreciated.

Hi all. We need your objective assessment!

We want to introduce some changes and are trying to create a set of cool avatars and would like to know what you think of the current options.

The letter of guarantee is a good feature from Mix Tum to their customers. It is missing from new mixers which don't know about it or don't want to do it and skip the letter because they plan to scam their users.

The letter of guarantee is one of many bricks to build up a good mixer.

The Power of Letter of Guarantee in Crypto Mixing

I think you misunderstood me, because obviously you haven't tried the free mix option, because when you get the BTC address for the deposit you get the following warning :



If the only correct amount for a free mix is exactly 0.001 BTC, then this warning can only confuse those people who do not pay attention to the details. Obviously, the amount of 0.003 BTC is completely wrong whether it is free or minimum amount for the mix.

        Yes, I noticed this moment, but I assumed that it should be so. I hope that the project team will quickly fix this.
        
         Naturally, nothing is perfect in this world. What is made by man almost always has flaws. This is part of the development of civilization and is the norm, that is associated attribute.
         Therefore, we turn on the mixer to the fullest, enjoy the process and life.

I have noticed the "Mix My Coins" page and the page for free service testing, all mixer services work fast and maybe the team responds to your statement immediately to change the FAQ according to the minimum amount to deposit to the mixer address.

I agree with @licius statement, that the mixer process runs properly without any effect, but it is recommended that users pay attention to the minimum and maximum numbers on the main page when doing the mixer process.

If you visit the home page (https://[banned mixer]/), you will see it. I think the reason you don't see it is that the forum signature links for some profiles show use this (https://[banned mixer]/?mix=free)



I suggested this here but looks like nothing has been done so far

I recently joined this campaign and it was logical to test how their service works. I have to admit that the mixing method that this mixer provides is really unique because the coins we get after mixing are not part of those coins that users send to the mixer, but they should be coins that come from other sources (exchanges). Therefore, such coins should not be marked as tainted when we use them in further transactions.

As for the mixing process itself, I tried the free mixing of 0.001 BTC and the process is quite simple as with most mixers. After a while I received an identical amount in my wallet and I have no objection to that.

What I noticed is that there is no special page for free mix, and this may confuse some users since the final page contains the following warning "Please send your bitcoins (min 0.003, max 50 BTC) to the address".

In addition, this warning does not look correct if we take into account what the FAQ says regarding the minimum amount, and there it says "Q - What is the minimum amount of funds for cleansing? A - 0.005 BTC".

Another thing I noticed is that there is no change on the mix link when the transaction is confirmed and sent, but it still reads the message "A transaction is detected, the sum is 0.001 BTC, awaiting confirmation".

---

Of course, all these are things that do not affect the process that happens in the background and that do not affect the end result. I hope that [banned mixer] will continue to develop its unique mixing methods and provide all clients with the best premium experience.

Thank you.


I am sorry to hear that about you and, fruktik. I, for one, lived only a few years in dictatorship, while I was very small. Being a Romanian child back then, I lived only a few years while Ceausescu was ruling the country. However, the dictatorship ended in December 1989. But I understand your situation, as I still have memories from my childhood. I can only hope that, at some moment, the regime from your country will be abolished and replaced with a democratic one...

At same time, even if this will ever happen, it won't change much regarding governments' surveillance. Big brother spies on its citizen in democratic countries, in monarchies and in dictatorships as well. So nothing will change here but, at least you will have a bit more freedom than now...


The laws get tougher for bitcoiners in the entire world, not only in your country. Elites want to centralize something which was born to be decentralized, which is an abomination. They will never be able to shut down Bitcoin so, instead, they are trying to exert more and more oppression on bitcoiners. However, as I anticipated a while ago, in time, this will only convince more and more people to use Bitcoin as Satoshi meant: peer-to-peer and anonymous!

          Yes, I do not argue with the fact that excessive mention of such mixers will not lead to anything good. The less you know the better you sleep. Didn't know about the fact that North Korea is doing this kind of money laundering thing. If the money is stolen, then naturally you need to use the crypt for them and mix it. Maybe we can tell the Koreans which service to use?
          In the end, I still decide for myself that such a commission is quite acceptable for me at the moment, if I am provided with a high level of anonymity and security.

Maybe this should be attention.
I've explored a lot of mixers here, the best one is chipmixer which gives us for free to mix our bitcoins. then i tried another mixer like Yomix where it's not free but they give us a chance to edit the fee to be low with the consequence of low privacy. I tried also mixtum and Mixy, good, all going smooth my clean bitcoin received succefully, but like you said we can't costume fee like Yomix, maybe they think it's for the best, but for me it's quite expensive to spend more than 30K satoshi fee  .

I appreciate this new development of translating ANN THREAD in the various local boards. This will encourage local board participation in the ANN threads. Many local users want to participate in ANN discussion but they don't have idea to do so many of them are huddle from the ANN threads, but with this I have seen more participation. I love that because this is an another way of growing local boards in the forum.
@GazetaBitcoin thanks for local board development in the forum by asking users to translate your threads too.

I agree with Gazeta and ScamVirus.

Privacy has a price, and in this case, I personally don't find the fees very high. Of course, it's cheaper with some other mixers. But at the same time, if you read the reports from blockchain analysis agencies and companies, Mixtum doesn't attract a lot of attention, and that's a great quality, especially when you want your coins not to be flagged. Mixtum's strategy is pretty good in my opinion.

Sinbad, one of the market leaders in the mixer's industry, attracts a lot of attention (that's why I stopped promoting their service), and I personally think that this is not to the users' advantage. Just read the latest Chainanalysis report and see how they are cited as the mixer the most used by North Korea to launder stolen funds for example. If your mixer's name appears in a lot of reports, how can you be 100% confident with the idea of mixing your coins via their service (especially for those selling them to a CEX at the end) ?  From my point of view, I'd be worried about mixing large quantities of coins via a service that gets so much notice and noise. I appreciate that Mixtum works more cleanly, and if the cost of this is a little higher than the price of some of their competitors, I don't mind.

If that's the price of having mixed and clean coins, without attracting too much attention, and in an efficient way, I personally think it's honest. Mixtum's way of working means they're safe for now, despite offering a constant service, and that's a very good sign. The way the coins are acquired and operated is excellent.

Maybe they think about commissions if the volume increases over time. When you expect the highest level of anonymity and they try to give it to you, you have to pay them service charges accordingly. Currently, the government of all countries is taking a strong stand, so no one wants to face irrelevant questions from the government. So any crypto user would want his fund connection to be untraceable. And this is where [banned mixer] is at work, providing the highest level of anonymity to those crypto users' funds. When I get the highest level of service, it shouldn't be difficult to pay such a commission, at least from my perspective.

Working on the Arabic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62536331

RESERVED THIS PLACE FOR URDU LANGUAGE TRANSLATION OF [banned mixer]

UPDATE

Successfully translated Main thread. you can check it in thr below link

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63073725

Special thanks to GazetaBitcoin for reminding me.

         I fully understand and appreciate this moment. I would prefer to remain as anonymous as possible on the global network and use such methods than to be in the palm of my hand in front of government agencies. This is especially true in my country, where there is a tough dictatorship and at any moment a lot of uncomfortable questions can arise out of the blue for no reason at all.
         In addition, in my state, the attitude towards blockchain technology and its derivatives is not the best. For several years now, battles have been going on in this direction, but so far nothing has been finally decided. I am more likely to assume that the laws on these issues will only become tougher.

Excepting the fact that technology requires certain costs, I would also add this: anonymity has its price. We live in a world where privacy and anonymity look more and more utopian day by day. Governments' surveillance over citizen reached an unthinkable level, with the help of the technology.

Same technology which was forbidden decades ago for regular citizen (cryptography, access to satellites, accurate geolocation etc.) can be accessed now, after tremendous efforts made by Cypherpunks like Whitfield Diffie, Phil Zimmermann, John Gilmore or Julian Assange.

However, even with cryptography free to use by all people, governments fight back using cryptanalysis. Therefore new methods needs to be approached, in order to still have the chance to remain anonymous. Mixers are giving a precious hand of help on this matter. For this reason I am saying that anonymity has its price. Those which want to remain anonymous will pay the price. Those which don't care for their privacy will face the risk of becoming a sitting ducks in front of the government or having their personal information leaked on DarkNet. Or become victims of identity thieves...