Hi CZ, thank you for your valuable input.
Are you currently supporting 1blocklologist's and Block chain Development's vision for BBR in the future?
Is there anything that they should be working on right now, to make the smoothest transition to a new development team?
Thanks again for all of your great work!
At the moment i can say only that 1blocklologist didn't get my trust yet.
He rejected to contribute to BBR repository with my code review, he did't show competence in BBR code base, he didn't do any improvements yet.
For me it looks like a fake, so be careful.
Zoidberg.
Has your opinion changed? Although I have in the past questioned the 1% developer mining share at times when you have not been active I share your concerns in this case.
My current opinion is as follows:
Negatives:
1. Currently I consider the
original GitHub repository to be official repository not the new
BlockChainDevelopmentCompany repository. Zoidberg has proven a high level of understanding of the Boolberry codebase and is willing to review pull requests from new developers.
2. I don't like that 1blocklologist changed the
Bitcointalk link on the r/boolberry sidebar to the new moderated thread which contains links to the new GitHub
3. I dislike the new BBR
masternode plan4. I dislike the plan to change the
BBR ticker to XBR5. I dislike all the Boolberry
price target speculation. Talk without a significant demonstration of development ability reminds me too much of pump an dump tactics common in other coins
Positives:
1. It is nice to have interest from a new developer since you have not been active in a long time
2. Since you have not been active I like the proposal to remove the 1% developer mining reward (my mind could be changed if you started developing again)
Well I'm obligated to be defensive about this, so here are the answers:
All five of your negatives were directly related to CryptoZoidberg disappearing. You were the one that posted on Twitter that nobody should even be using Boolberry
August 28th:
"#Boolberry development is non existent. If you are looking for a #Monero alternative with #pruning and an active developer look at #Aeon." and this 100% contributed to my company's plans.
Boolberry development is no longer non existent, with a 100% correlation to my activity, and thats the modest version of that statement.
The masternode development hasn't even begun, we are working on everything else on the roadmap, and when we get that far we are open to input from the community.
The ticker symbol idea wasn't a plan, it was a comment. Lets have a discussion, this is a collaborative process.
We view Boolberry as undervalued. Taking the price target talk into conjunction with the masternode plan and you'd see that people wouldn't need to "dump" because it effectively turns Boolberry into an interest earning asset. We are also actively doing things necessary to get Boolberry on Bitsquare so that there are robust OTC markets that allow people to move a lot of Boolberry without affecting the order books on centralized exchanges.
We can submit pull requests at any time, so it is misguided to form an absolute opinion that because we haven't that we won't. We haven't done anything that would cause harm to the network and have only improved it, nothing we are doing will cause a fork, or any "battle" between developers. Leave amateur hour to bitcoin and ethereum. We have made a lot of improvements to the RPC server, for example.
Hope that helps!
