Whats happen to the price? 
It has been going down for weeks & now you ask LMAO?
BBR is getting REKT
I have too much coins cannot check all the time
Its bad the dev gone?
Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 235. (Read 1210750 times)
October 11, 2014, 07:55:12 PM
It has been going down for weeks & now you ask LMAO?
BBR is getting REKT
I have too much coins cannot check all the time
Its bad the dev gone?
October 11, 2014, 06:40:04 PM
Is this coin already part of the jl7777 network?
Yes
October 11, 2014, 06:23:12 PM
Is this coin already part of the jl7777 network?
October 11, 2014, 05:24:09 PM
the question is where is btc going to
October 11, 2014, 12:30:00 PM
CZ can you please elaborate on the deal that you did not accept? i.e. who specifically was the "outside" investor and what did they want?
+1
If its the case here, I don't think we will told any more than we already have. So lets move on.
Jon
I doubt seriously there is such a thing in a decentralized open source community project, is there? Even if so, we the stakeholders are the investors and should know these dealings: hence "CZ's pre-announcement". These announcements and dealings greatly affect whether and how I/we should increase or decrease stake and trust in this particular investment and community. Who is CZ keeping a secret/protection from, us?
Edit: it is clear imo that this "deal" has put quite a bit of sell pressure on the market and those of us who don't know what went down are out of luck. Although the investment (money) side of it is important, more so is the trust in having a level playing field in the future. I think it would be wise for the devs to be very clear on what happened.
Hmm, I don't know. Sounds like it was a private offer to CZ. I don't really see much benefit to making it public tbh. Sounds like it will just stir up more drama. Some people will be for it and some will be against it, but it's already been decided by CZ so people will just be fighting over nothing.
I see the merit in what you mean with the whole decentralized open source community project thing though.
October 11, 2014, 11:23:41 AM
Whats happen to the price?
It's cause I bought some last night. I'd buy some more, but then it's just keep going down.RIP
October 11, 2014, 10:40:18 AM
CZ can you please elaborate on the deal that you did not accept? i.e. who specifically was the "outside" investor and what did they want?
+1
If its the case here, I don't think we will told any more than we already have. So lets move on.
Jon
I doubt seriously there is such a thing in a decentralized open source community project, is there? Even if so, we the stakeholders are the investors and should know these dealings: hence "CZ's pre-announcement". These announcements and dealings greatly affect whether and how I/we should increase or decrease stake and trust in this particular investment and community. Who is CZ keeping a secret/protection from, us?
Edit: it is clear imo that this "deal" has put quite a bit of sell pressure on the market and those of us who don't know what went down are out of luck. Although the investment (money) side of it is important, more so is the trust in having a level playing field in the future. I think it would be wise for the devs to be very clear on what happened.
October 11, 2014, 10:11:53 AM
Whats happen to the price?
It's cause I bought some last night. I'd buy some more, but then it's just keep going down. October 11, 2014, 10:10:35 AM
Whats happen to the price?
It has been going down for weeks & now you ask LMAO?
BBR is getting REKT
October 11, 2014, 09:37:36 AM
Whats happen to the price?
October 11, 2014, 09:10:59 AM
hey guys,
is there a current working block explorer,Mingergate says the last block was found 5 months ago.
is there a current working block explorer,Mingergate says the last block was found 5 months ago.
Yes at ChainRadar (but it is stuck atm too)
@Zoidberg, please add it to OP.
October 11, 2014, 07:58:08 AM
CZ can you please elaborate on the deal that you did not accept? i.e. who specifically was the "outside" investor and what did they want?
+1
If its the case here, I don't think we will told any more than we already have. So lets move on.
Jon
October 11, 2014, 05:02:10 AM
I haven't gone into detail about it because I hope it might be reconsidered at some point. And announcing the details of it wouldn't matter now anyway. In fact, some other coin could very well steal the idea.
Please fuck off with your high pressure sales tactics. Nobody, least of all CZ, cares about your 'ACT NOW!!! THIS INCREDIBLE OFFER WON'T LAST LONG' infomercial BS.
Google search 'shady SEO' --> 900K+ results
Do you realize how silly you sound?
Btw, how's your marketing campaign for Monero going? Your allegiance is so obvious it's a joke.
Perhaps I should post the PM where you sent where you said if Boolberry kept its name you would start marketing for BBR.
Apparently that was a big fat lie. Instead you are marketing for Monero and Duckcoin. And meanwhile just trolling this thread.
People see you for who you are. And they keep talking about you to me. I just tell them to ignore you. Now I'll take my own advice.
October 11, 2014, 04:26:01 AM
hey guys,
is there a current working block explorer,Mingergate says the last block was found 5 months ago.
is there a current working block explorer,Mingergate says the last block was found 5 months ago.
October 11, 2014, 02:21:30 AM
I haven't gone into detail about it because I hope it might be reconsidered at some point. And announcing the details of it wouldn't matter now anyway. In fact, some other coin could very well steal the idea.
Please fuck off with your high pressure sales tactics. Nobody, least of all CZ, cares about your 'ACT NOW!!! THIS INCREDIBLE OFFER WON'T LAST LONG' infomercial BS.
Google search 'shady SEO' --> 900K+ results
October 11, 2014, 01:45:33 AM
CZ can you please elaborate on the deal that you did not accept? i.e. who specifically was the "outside" investor and what did they want?
October 10, 2014, 05:17:34 PM
How are they contradicting each other? People have made a lot of wild speculations, but CZ didn't imply any wrong doing at all. Just sounded like he just wants to continue doing exactly what he's doing now and not pursue other avenues. Which is perfectly fine of course.
zoidberg said he didn't think the suggestions boded well for BBR's future, which is probably why people think it's shady rather than simply alternative.No. He did not. He said he got an offer from some outside investors. He didn't think their offer boded well for BBR. He was working on an alternate plan - the one that I pre-announced - but decided not to go forward at this time. Its not completely off the table - or some variant thereof.
People just like drama - so they make up words like "shady" to stir things up.
wow, i thought you were the outside investor. thats the reason of the misunderstanding. do you know what they wanted?
if its true, it makes sense that you havent sold your BBR. They are the ones that must have sold it. Maybe it was bytecoin looking for a way-out of their mess?
I do not know exactly what they wanted. I believe they were looking to change BBR in some dramatic way. Outside investors typically want a lot in return for their investment. I do not think CZ took them too seriously, although I can't and won't speak on CZ's behalf on that.
The other option discussed did not require a hard fork and it would have paid miners more in tx fees. I haven't gone into detail about it because I hope it might be reconsidered at some point. And announcing the details of it wouldn't matter now anyway. In fact, some other coin could very well steal the idea.
October 10, 2014, 05:02:38 PM
How are they contradicting each other? People have made a lot of wild speculations, but CZ didn't imply any wrong doing at all. Just sounded like he just wants to continue doing exactly what he's doing now and not pursue other avenues. Which is perfectly fine of course.
zoidberg said he didn't think the suggestions boded well for BBR's future, which is probably why people think it's shady rather than simply alternative.No. He did not. He said he got an offer from some outside investors. He didn't think their offer boded well for BBR. He was working on an alternate plan - the one that I pre-announced - but decided not to go forward at this time. Its not completely off the table - or some variant thereof.
People just like drama - so they make up words like "shady" to stir things up.
wow, i thought you were the outside investor. thats the reason of the misunderstanding. do you know what they wanted?
if its true, it makes sense that you havent sold your BBR. They are the ones that must have sold it. Maybe it was bytecoin looking for a way-out of their mess?
October 10, 2014, 04:17:00 PM
[quote so they make up words like "shady" to stir things up.
+1"Shady" is pure worst-case speculation since not enough details have been revealed. It could just be a diff in opinion what is a good business decision. For example, if the solution requires a hard fork, then the positives need to greatly outweigh the big negative, and this is subject to differing conclusions.
October 10, 2014, 03:59:02 PM
How are they contradicting each other? People have made a lot of wild speculations, but CZ didn't imply any wrong doing at all. Just sounded like he just wants to continue doing exactly what he's doing now and not pursue other avenues. Which is perfectly fine of course.
zoidberg said he didn't think the suggestions boded well for BBR's future, which is probably why people think it's shady rather than simply alternative.No. He did not. He said he got an offer from some outside investors. He didn't think their offer boded well for BBR. He was working on an alternate plan - the one that I pre-announced - but decided not to go forward at this time. Its not completely off the table - or some variant thereof.
People just like drama - so they make up words like "shady" to stir things up.
Jump to: