How are they contradicting each other? People have made a lot of wild speculations, but CZ didn't imply any wrong doing at all. Just sounded like he just wants to continue doing exactly what he's doing now and not pursue other avenues. Which is perfectly fine of course.
zoidberg said he didn't think the suggestions boded well for BBR's future, which is probably why people think it's shady rather than simply alternative. 
Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 236. (Read 1210750 times)
October 10, 2014, 03:45:09 PM
October 10, 2014, 12:14:04 PM
windjc, cant you tell what really happened? seems only CZ and you know the truth but your 2 stories are contradicting each other. so people are left speculating
How are they contradicting each other? People have made a lot of wild speculations, but CZ didn't imply any wrong doing at all. Just sounded like he just wants to continue doing exactly what he's doing now and not pursue other avenues. Which is perfectly fine of course.
October 10, 2014, 12:02:46 PM
windjc, cant you tell what really happened? seems only CZ and you know the truth but your 2 stories are contradicting each other. so people are left speculating
October 10, 2014, 10:33:09 AM
Please calm folks. There is a place for SEO marketers AND C++ coders in this world. Maybe time to drop the argument.
October 10, 2014, 03:09:27 AM
You obviously don't even know what SEO is. lol. Spam? lol. You really don't even know the topic. Should have known. I wonder how hard Mike Hearn is laughing reading this thread. 
I've already told you exactly what SEO is:
SEO is one small step above spam.
Have fun manipulating ranking algorithms for whatever coins are foolish and desperate enough to engage your slimy services.
Lol. Ive never offered such services to a coin.
Good luck discrediting yourself with every post.
October 10, 2014, 03:07:14 AM
You obviously don't even know what SEO is. lol. Spam? lol. You really don't even know the topic. Should have known. I wonder how hard Mike Hearn is laughing reading this thread.
I've already told you exactly what SEO is:
SEO is one small step above spam.
Have fun manipulating ranking algorithms for whatever coins are foolish and desperate enough to engage your slimy services.
October 10, 2014, 02:53:50 AM
I have actually made over a million dollars in SEO related businesses that Ive own and/or sold.
Even a junior high school student knows SEO is one small step above spam. I don't want BBR spamvertising individuals or search engines, TYVM.
Spare us your dirty tricks and sketchy arrangements, and stop butthurting about the fact that CZ declined your 'offer he couldn't refuse.'
You obviously don't even know what SEO is. lol. Spam? lol. You really don't even know the topic. Should have known. I wonder how hard Mike Hearn is laughing reading this thread.
October 10, 2014, 02:29:14 AM
I have actually made over a million dollars in SEO related businesses that Ive own and/or sold.
Even a junior high school student knows SEO is one small step above spam. I don't want BBR spamvertising individuals or search engines, TYVM.
Spare us your dirty tricks and sketchy arrangements, and stop butthurting about the fact that CZ declined your 'offer he couldn't refuse.'
October 10, 2014, 02:11:23 AM
Rather than argue why not just use a spare cpu if you have one and mine straight to CZ's alias at clintar's pool you can just put @zoidberg in the little box and check how much has been raised.
I don't think CZ is going to try and change things to ask for more, it doesn't seem to be his style. So if you want to support further development with no strings attached just do it. I see this as a way the community
can show CZ that we can do more than just bitch about everything including each other. If you took the time read this thank you
Jon
I don't think CZ is going to try and change things to ask for more, it doesn't seem to be his style. So if you want to support further development with no strings attached just do it. I see this as a way the community
can show CZ that we can do more than just bitch about everything including each other. If you took the time read this thank you
Jon
October 10, 2014, 12:34:08 AM
I must admit this is an ironic conversation about how to raise funds. The idea that CZ turned down would have actually paid the miners 10x more in tx fees than they currently make. Not taxed them.
Nobody except you cares about the scam CZ in which declined to participate.
Don't you have search engines to optimize or something?
Actually a lot of people care. You are just ignorant. Again. Don't you have some C++ code to write to secure the future of crypto?
And as far as your junior high school jabs at me about SEO, I have actually made over a million dollars in SEO related businesses that Ive own and/or sold. Its mainly how I acquired such a large crypto bankroll. Yes, a bankroll that Ive documented with screen shots in my post history, so dont ask me to provide any "proof." Go find it yourself.
I'd love to know your business background and why anyone would want to listen to your random internet opinions. Im always open to learn from someone with a track record in something.
October 10, 2014, 12:32:31 AM
I must admit this is an ironic conversation about how to raise funds. The idea that CZ turned down would have actually paid the miners 10x more in tx fees than they currently make. Not taxed them.
Nobody except you cares about the scam CZ in which declined to participate.
Don't you have search engines to optimize or something?
October 10, 2014, 12:23:32 AM
I just want to say with windjc out and with your decision to turn down funding for whatever principles they wanted you to go against. I applaud you. If I can get some bbr's cheap enough I may 
Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding.
Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding. Shall we change the project donation to 2-5% of the minted coins?
I think a 'Coin Maintenance and Development' fee of 2-5% is not only justified, but required by circumstance.
Charge the miners a 2-5% tax of each block of CZ's coin they find, to compensate him for his work and provide for the future of the coin.
+1 Now that is more like it!!
I must admit this is an ironic conversation about how to raise funds. The idea that CZ turned down would have actually paid the miners 10x more in tx fees than they currently make. Not taxed them.
October 09, 2014, 11:51:44 PM
I just want to say with windjc out and with your decision to turn down funding for whatever principles they wanted you to go against. I applaud you. If I can get some bbr's cheap enough I may Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding.
Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding. Shall we change the project donation to 2-5% of the minted coins?
I think a 'Coin Maintenance and Development' fee of 2-5% is not only justified, but required by circumstance.
Charge the miners a 2-5% tax of each block of CZ's coin they find, to compensate him for his work and provide for the future of the coin.
+1 Now that is more like it!!
October 09, 2014, 11:50:25 PM
I am really happy, that some of you are talking about how to better the coin. Gives me hope that the coin can move forward. THE XST forum has descended into chaos, page after page of trolls and fudsters, and the idiots who engage them. Its one of the indicators I use when I'm investing in a coin. How much positive interest there is in a coin, and signs that the dev and the community are interested in helping promote the coin, and to improve on it. The idea of increasing the donation to 5% is the first constructive thing I've heard since CZ decided not to go forward with the fundraiser.
Increasing the donation to 6% is a 20% better idea.
Well you certainly not Too Dumb for Bitcoin. Yous should change your handle
October 09, 2014, 11:48:32 PM
I am really happy, that some of you are talking about how to better the coin. Gives me hope that the coin can move forward. THE XST forum has descended into chaos, page after page of trolls and fudsters, and the idiots who engage them. Its one of the indicators I use when I'm investing in a coin. How much positive interest there is in a coin, and signs that the dev and the community are interested in helping promote the coin, and to improve on it. The idea of increasing the donation to 5% is the first constructive thing I've heard since CZ decided not to go forward with the fundraiser.
Increasing the donation to 6% is a 20% better idea.
I got it.
I've added a 2% dev fee at my pool, and lowered my fee to 1%. Maybe I'll set up another pool instance that will listen on another port with a higher fee, and possibly reverse it at some point, so the main ports mine at 4%, and the alternate ports only do 2%. Any other ideas/comments/name calling because I just went ahead and did it?
October 09, 2014, 11:48:12 PM
I just want to say with windjc out and with your decision to turn down funding for whatever principles they wanted you to go against. I applaud you. If I can get some bbr's cheap enough I may Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding.
Regardless of the price - your decision reconfirmed legitimacy. I hope we can figure out the funding. Shall we change the project donation to 2-5% of the minted coins?
I think a 'Coin Maintenance and Development' fee of 2-5% is not only justified, but required by circumstance.
Charge the miners a 2-5% tax of each block of CZ's coin they find, to compensate him for his work and provide for the future of the coin.
October 09, 2014, 11:35:37 PM
I am really happy, that some of you are talking about how to better the coin. Gives me hope that the coin can move forward. THE XST forum has descended into chaos, page after page of trolls and fudsters, and the idiots who engage them. Its one of the indicators I use when I'm investing in a coin. How much positive interest there is in a coin, and signs that the dev and the community are interested in helping promote the coin, and to improve on it. The idea of increasing the donation to 5% is the first constructive thing I've heard since CZ decided not to go forward with the fundraiser.
Increasing the donation to 6% is a 20% better idea.
October 09, 2014, 11:28:32 PM
I am really happy, that some of you are talking about how to better the coin. Gives me hope that the coin can move forward. THE XST forum has descended into chaos, page after page of trolls and fudsters, and the idiots who engage them. Its one of the indicators I use when I'm investing in a coin. How much positive interest there is in a coin, and signs that the dev and the community are interested in helping promote the coin, and to improve on it. The idea of increasing the donation to 5% is the first constructive thing I've heard since CZ decided not to go forward with the fundraiser.
October 09, 2014, 10:18:04 PM
im glad to hear that the supernet deal with bbr is still on! two great techs combined into one!!!!
October 09, 2014, 10:17:56 PM
a lot of crypto coders don't understand "C" very well, so right now even the code is a little out of their depth.
I understand that C is not ideal for security purposes compared to C++, and its usage was responsible for the Troll Block exploit that recently caused Monero no small amount hassle.
Jump to: