[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 444.

surfer43

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

"Trading Platform of The Future!"

Quote from: dga on June 02, 2014, 11:57:32 AM

Sorry, should have been more clear: boolbd is the full daemon.

A standalone miner such as cpuminer is *much* more lightweight.

The challenge for BBR will be communicating the blockchain scratchpad to the miner processes, but it's not impossible.

There is already a proof-of-concept. Simpleminer can mine directly to the daemon. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6986458

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dga on June 02, 2014, 11:57:32 AM

Quote from: btc-mike on June 02, 2014, 11:54:10 AM

Quote from: dga on June 02, 2014, 11:31:42 AM

Quote from: emontmon on June 02, 2014, 11:17:01 AM

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs.
1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage.
2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control.

is not number 2 extremely important.

A good way to address this would be to get a standalone miner that can mine into the wallet (as works well in bitcoin), instead of just pools. That would enable people to run one wallet and have many miners, instead of running many copies of the wallet. In general, the standalone miners are easier to compile and run, and work on a wider variety of systems.

(And, while it may be less of an issue for BBR, for other CN* coins, one wallet will use less network bandwidth than many).

boolbd works exactly that way. I have one wallet on my main desktop. I have several other machines mining with boolbd using the wallet address.

boolbd --start-mining=

--mining-threads=

No - boolbd is the full daemon/wallet.

A standalone miner such as cpuminer is *much* more lightweight.

The challenge for BBR will be communicating the blockchain scratchpad to the miner processes, but it's not impossible.

Ah, I understand what you are saying. I am not sure when that will come.

akidokatsui

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

Quote from: surfer43 on June 02, 2014, 11:43:32 AM

Quote from: akidokatsui on June 02, 2014, 11:39:37 AM

hello,

i try to open simplewallet.exe but just open in few second and close automatic. so can't create new walllet.

in simplewallet.log say : 2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.764598 Boolberry wallet v0.1.1.10(d03e340)
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.855603 Error: you must specify --wallet-file or --generate-new-wallet params
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.860603 ERROR ..\..\src\simplewallet\simplewallet.cpp:1041[main]Failed to initialize wallet

what's problem for this error ?

please help me

thank you

You have to start simplewallet.exe like this

Code:

simplewallet.exe --generate-new-wallet wallet.bin

In the future you can open wallet.bin with

Code:

simplewallet.exe --wallet-file wallet.bin

wow it's work. thank you very much

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: btc-mike on June 02, 2014, 11:54:10 AM

Quote from: dga on June 02, 2014, 11:31:42 AM

Quote from: emontmon on June 02, 2014, 11:17:01 AM

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs.
1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage.
2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control.

is not number 2 extremely important.

A good way to address this would be to get a standalone miner that can mine into the wallet (as works well in bitcoin), instead of just pools. That would enable people to run one wallet and have many miners, instead of running many copies of the wallet. In general, the standalone miners are easier to compile and run, and work on a wider variety of systems.

(And, while it may be less of an issue for BBR, for other CN* coins, one wallet will use less network bandwidth than many).

boolbd works exactly that way. I have one wallet on my main desktop. I have several other machines mining with boolbd using the wallet address.

boolbd --start-mining=

--mining-threads=

Sorry, should have been more clear: boolbd is the full daemon.

A standalone miner such as cpuminer is *much* more lightweight.

The challenge for BBR will be communicating the blockchain scratchpad to the miner processes, but it's not impossible.

malei

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Is there progress on the base GUI (as per the roadmap)?
Shocked

btc-mike

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dga on June 02, 2014, 11:31:42 AM

Quote from: emontmon on June 02, 2014, 11:17:01 AM

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs.
1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage.
2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control.

is not number 2 extremely important.

A good way to address this would be to get a standalone miner that can mine into the wallet (as works well in bitcoin), instead of just pools. That would enable people to run one wallet and have many miners, instead of running many copies of the wallet. In general, the standalone miners are easier to compile and run, and work on a wider variety of systems.

(And, while it may be less of an issue for BBR, for other CN* coins, one wallet will use less network bandwidth than many).

boolbd works exactly that way. I have one wallet on my main desktop. I have several other machines mining with boolbd using the wallet address.

boolbd --start-mining=

--mining-threads=

surfer43

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

"Trading Platform of The Future!"

Quote from: akidokatsui on June 02, 2014, 11:39:37 AM

hello,

i try to open simplewallet.exe but just open in few second and close automatic. so can't create new walllet.

in simplewallet.log say : 2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.764598 Boolberry wallet v0.1.1.10(d03e340)
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.855603 Error: you must specify --wallet-file or --generate-new-wallet params
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.860603 ERROR ..\..\src\simplewallet\simplewallet.cpp:1041[main]Failed to initialize wallet

what's problem for this error ?

please help me

thank you

You have to start simplewallet.exe like this

Code:

simplewallet.exe --generate-new-wallet wallet.bin

In the future you can open wallet.bin with

Code:

simplewallet.exe --wallet-file wallet.bin

akidokatsui

member

Activity: 66

Merit: 10

hello,

i try to open simplewallet.exe but just open in few second and close automatic. so can't create new walllet.

in simplewallet.log say : 2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.764598 Boolberry wallet v0.1.1.10(d03e340)
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.855603 Error: you must specify --wallet-file or --generate-new-wallet params
2014-Jun-02 22:36:21.860603 ERROR ..\..\src\simplewallet\simplewallet.cpp:1041[main]Failed to initialize wallet

what's problem for this error ?

please help me

thank you

dga

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 511

Quote from: emontmon on June 02, 2014, 11:17:01 AM

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs.
1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage.
2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control.

is not number 2 extremely important.

A good way to address this would be to get a standalone miner that can mine into the wallet (as works well in bitcoin), instead of just pools. That would enable people to run one wallet and have many miners, instead of running many copies of the wallet. In general, the standalone miners are easier to compile and run, and work on a wider variety of systems.

(And, while it may be less of an issue for BBR, for other CN* coins, one wallet will use less network bandwidth than many).

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

i understand peoples' want for immediate gratification. but if decentralization is key and important for cryptocurrenciees, shouldn't brain function supersede emotional needs.
1. 5 days full block is better than little payments at this stage.
2. no centralization issues. one pool getting control.

is not number 2 extremely important.

Anotheranonlol

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 504

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 11:07:43 AM

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

So the entir BBR network is working like a pool?

No. Everyone is solo-mining. there is no pool launched yet.

luckykitty

sr. member

Activity: 533

Merit: 251

Quote from: Anotheranonlol on June 02, 2014, 10:47:21 AM

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

So the entir BBR network is working like a pool?

Anotheranonlol

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 504

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 10:34:57 AM

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

Yes, that's exactly why people like pools. instead of waiting perhaps 5 days of CPU stressing for a chance of finding a block, you will receive regular small payments.

luckykitty

sr. member

Activity: 533

Merit: 251

Sorry I dont get it, does it mean even I mine with a very small hashrate, I can get coins everyday?

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: luckykitty on June 02, 2014, 09:39:51 AM

When we can have a pool?

if decentralization is important, why is a pool necessary?

luckykitty

sr. member

Activity: 533

Merit: 251

When we can have a pool?

pttx

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: crypto_zoidberg on June 02, 2014, 04:18:04 AM

Quote from: pttx on June 01, 2014, 10:35:33 PM

Anyone else getting this error while trying to transfer?

Error: transaction <1edab0d63b5c19af30aa0a36b850ff3535fd883f3332b0627837c140aa44da60> was rejected by daemon with status "Failed"

I tried rebuilding and still getting the same error. This is the error message in the daemon.

2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816807 [RPC0]Transaction verification failed:
2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816968 [RPC0][on_send_raw_tx]: Failed to process tx
2014-Jun-02 03:31:04.975187 [RPC1]transaction is too big for current transaction flow, tx_id: <67afa7a671e0e4436fc508ebe0a29971f8b47d576341cce9602e327093458d4a>

What software version ? How much coins you have tried to send? You can PM me if you want.

Build from latest github update on osx. Was trying to send 10k, but smaller transactions seems to work.

emontmon

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 10

Quote from: nakaone on June 02, 2014, 07:20:31 AM

this is the most funniest price I have ever seen on a project

is it THAT profitable to mine?

That's the funniest fud. Do you have a point in leaving the Darkcoin thread

eddywise

sr. member

Activity: 253

Merit: 250

Let's Boolberry

I had made a chinese translation
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bbrboolberrypow-636021

superresistant

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1131

Quote from: sdersdf2 on June 02, 2014, 07:16:52 AM

Is this just a pump and dump coin, or does the dev/community have long-term plans for this coin?

Dev/community doesn't give a shit about the price.
It only matter the long term.

Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 444. (Read 1210753 times)