:://:::
Winning once is luck, winning twice with a 4-minute prediction factor and with the statistical data in the post above, it only indicates that you take your time to give a prediction....
_-------------------____
Nope ... I still think it's just one big luck although...
Hi, the thing is that you cannot be blunt (Nope:
), and in any case if that is corroborated by the aforementioned winner, so ok, he is the one who should say it.
That classic position oriented toward luck,
which always exists, because in probabilistic terms, "bad" luck is the probability against and good luck is the probability in favor.
It is the classic position that leads you to believe that everyone who wins in the long term is due to luck, and everyone who loses money is an addict. When winning or losing should only make you improve your skills.
Then, someone who sees that case, the one mentioned (cansaty*), not only says it was luck, checks the statistics and realizes that both teams, for example, have a high probability of scoring in the first 10/5/etc. minutes, is a statistical fact.
If you do that, it brings you closer to winning, since the probability of getting it right is 1.11%, if we take a closed factor of 90, but! not all places deal with it probability, improving with the factor of the closest one. And! what is important about this contest is that there is always a winner.
So, it doesn't matter if the winner did that search or won by simple luck, you interpret it and in a next prediction you review those numbers and adjust it to a better reality than just randomly grabbing any minute.
(*) @cantsay. I wrote it wrong so as not to quote you again, but you should know that they are collaterals of fame. (edit: I did it again / )