Topic: Being a Smart Person or Strategic - page 62. (Read 16937 times)
If you are smart you will create a good long term strategy for your life and your money. There is no way how a smart person cannot be strategic, they go together hand by hand as qualities. A smart person thinks ahead and thinks outside the box so he will develop a good strategy for his future life and money. If you don't plan ahead you are not considered a smart person.
I think it is both the same but if i actually need to choose i would say smart because that way i can make my own strategy because i am smart anyways.
What does being smart means? One can be smart and he can act very strategic, but if the luck is not with him and he's not luck, he can't do anything on crypto market. You should be luck first.
And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
And then you should be able to investigate the market opportunities without getting bored.
Why should you be lucky first? Everything in life takes skill. If someone relies on luck even if they win then it will not be as beneficial as someone who earns with hard work.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Well it goes hand in hand, being smart and being strategic. Strategic means you get the most advantages of action in a given situation which its prerequisite skill is being smart and true you need these skills if you want to be successful financially.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
In the field of bitcoin, having both is very important because here, hardwork is not the only thing needed instead you should be both smart and strategic. You should be smart with the people whom you are going to trust and with the campaigns you are going to enter. You should be strategic on the sense that you are planning everything including the time where you may get your profit and your time management in terms of posting. This is very important and it should not be disregarded.For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Balance is the key, if you are a balanced person you have more chances to have success. I agree with you, only hardwork isn't enough if the person doesn't have a future vision about his life. You can work really hard and earn only pennies in the end, because there isn't a goal, a rule, a management. Being smart and strategic is very important, but I would say you must be aware about every news also, it helps a lot.
People who wasn't and isn't aware about technology news probably don't know Bitcoin yet and these people are losing a golden chance.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
In the field of bitcoin, having both is very important because here, hardwork is not the only thing needed instead you should be both smart and strategic. You should be smart with the people whom you are going to trust and with the campaigns you are going to enter. You should be strategic on the sense that you are planning everything including the time where you may get your profit and your time management in terms of posting. This is very important and it should not be disregarded. For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Being smart implicates being strategic . You need both things to succeed in your life . For instance if you think of investing your funds or starting a new project it means you are smart and you want your financial status to improve in an active way . And to do that you need a firm strategy .
Smart people just need the opportunity to realize what's in the head to be true. And strategic people are people who need supportive conditions to act. I am more inclined become smart.
If you do really need to choose one i would rather choose smart than on strategic but for me it would be better if you do have these both things combined because for sure if you have this kind of characteristics then you can easily able to make yourself resourceful on anything you do like to do. You can be considered smart by the matter of experience, you earn strategical ways on handling money or what you call financial intelligence. The knowledge that comes from experience is a product of successes and failures that you encounter in a particular span of time.
Quote
be considered smart by the matter of experience
Surely the experience matters the mist in terms of increasing your smartness. Just imagine a fresher stepping out of the college and entering into firm for working. He will be very little experienced and might carry smartness but no way he can apply it in the work ethics. If there is senior person then case would be exactly opposite, they will have smartness with experience!
Quote
you earn strategical ways on handling money or what you call financial intelligence
Obviously that will follow you automatically if you achieved the first point clearly and applied in the reality. The strategy is outcome of your methods and learning which is nothing but your smartness. So it's better to have both of them altogether and lead your way towards successful life. Easy.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
I think both is somehow related to each other or I think it is both same because we all know that being a smart person will somehow have a strategic mind that can give him a good income and of course earnings. And being smart person has alot of options to do not actually stick only on his one strategy.
I think smart is more than just strategic, if the person is not strategic then the person is not smart enough. Smart people always think to do something and always plan everything as well as possible.
For me, being smart and strategic works together. Being strategic is a way of showing how smart you can be in handling a certain situation, no matter what it can be.
I'd rather be a strategic person, it is better to work intelligently and strategically. I have seen some smart people working hard, studying hard to earn their goals. But they just follow the regular and old same way of doing it. Sometimes I see them as a lazy workers and full of pride. When I ask them, they tell me that they can do it because they are smart. They tend to disregard time. But if you work strategically, you can have your own way of doing something and achieving you goals the easy way. Don't work hard, work intelligently.
I think it walk side by side
You have to be smart to make good strategy
So why the say "think smart"
You have to be smart to make good strategy
So why the say "think smart"
For me, I think being a strategic person comes with being a smart one right? Because when you look at it this way, If you are smart, then you could think all good strategies that will benefit you in your life, you can make good decisions knowing that it will all be worth it. So for me, I'd go for being a smart person.
Strategy is everything and in bitcoins nothing matters but the strategy because pump and dump occurs and the strategic investor never get panic but other one will be in hustle and will lose easily so make a strategy and then jump into the bitcoins and here those are successful who are strategic and have skills to overcome the panic of dump and everyone should lean this, 
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
In my case, I find it more effective to be a strategic person because if you are strategic, it means every thing that you are doing is well planned and designed to successful. Being strategic to me is already being smart because when you are strategizing, you are using your knowledge to build a well though plan for you to earn money and I guess it's already enough.For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
I don't think you could equal these terms
As to be, being smart is something which you are born with, in other words, it is something which is inherent to you. If you are smart, you can train to be smarter, but if you ain't, you'll be just wasting your time (for the most part). On the other hand, any decent strategy is based on experience, but experience, as the word itself suggests, can be accumulated with time. So developing and finally working out a good strategy is a conscious effort which involves building enough experience. As such, that has nothing to do with smartness (or lack thereof)
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Yes its should be balance. You must be strategic and smart as the sams time. Being smart will make things easier for you to understand because if you are not smart it will be hard for you. Being startegic is also you need to become wise all the time and to know how to handle your money correctly. It will be nonsense even you are smart if you dont know how to used it well. You must be strategic in order for you to be ready for your future life.For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
Is it enough to be smart with just nothing to lean on and go on with your life? Because i feel that there are a lot of people who doesn't know how to handle their money with regards to see in the future. Is it enough to be smart and not be strategical or somewhat a person who has a lot of experience. Who would you choose?
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
For me it is required to be a master of both things like of course you can not have experience if you are not going to try and some people would think it's a waste of their time if they are doing what they know already like repeating their work over and over again. So it should be in a balance.
In my own perspective, we should be the both. We need to be a strategic person for us to live in this world. We need to have an strategy hpw to earn money, how to live in the fullest. Also, we need to be smart on how we handle those situations that we experience everyday. We need to learn in life to be a better person in future.
For me beinhvstrategic is more important than being smart it regarf with the practicality in life. Being smart is useless if you will kot know how to be practical
I prefer being a strategic person than being smart because being strategic means you are not making decisions according to what you have learned in school or whats inside the book. There are a lot of smart people out there that is not successful in life.
Jump to: