Twitchy, you're going on a non stop libeling rampage again. I relayed to you what I'm told at Betcoin regarding the issues you've brought up. I don't have to tell you what % I get or my address, or my passport #. See where I'm going with this?
We both have the freedom to say pretty much whatever we want, let's just have a simple yet rational conversation about the way Betcoin is behaving ok?
I think we agree that Betcoin over raked their cash games last November/December
We disagree on how much they took and how long it went on.
Betcoin has maintained that the period was only 3-5 days and they feel no financial obligation.
I think it was happening for somewhere between 40-42 days for a very substantial amount, much more than 10 Bitcoin. I also went into great detail explaining exactly how I came up with this conclusion while taking all the promos and rakeback into consideration. I also shared evidence I gathered to back up my claim. (Im not gonna repost it all since its ITT already, let me know if you can't find any part/I wasn't clear/somethings missing)
You have described it as a "brief period" for a "minuscule amount." And so far have refused to elaborate.
Do you still believe this is true? If so, why? How are we coming to such different conclusions?
If you think any of my calculations are wrong or you find any sort of issue, i'm interested in your opinion.
What am I missing?
Do you think I could be right?
Like I said you failed to consider the multiple types of RAKEBACK that players received; some were prop players and hence received 100%+ rakeback. Other players, such as those under this program, received 50-190% rakeback throughout that period. In essence, both of these groups could be considered prop players to a certain degree. And then you did not calculate the normal VIP/affiliate rakeback of the players. When you factor in everything, the amount is minuscule.
