Topic: 🎲BetFury.io|​​​💫 Stellar network & XLM 💫|📈BFG farming on BabySwap - page 21. (Read 82230 times)

That 1B locked tokens doesn’t change the fact that it was still owned by the team. They just delayed part of their holdings but they still have some reserves allocated for marketing and other expenses for casino which they consistently liquidating on the liquidity pool to get funds from holders money.

This is just a trick to let holders think that team is holding their token long term while they can’t liquidate that huge amount of tokens immediately since it will give a huge price impact so they just lock it while they still have other tokens to use.

What I don’t understand on Betfury management is why they still using BFG token reserves for casino marketing while they already have a working casino that generate profit.

I guess they decide to stay silent for a while so that they can properly think about some good developments to be made for their token since it will be crazy if they don't follow their own plan and mix it up with lots of suggestion of people since maybe there would be a lot of trouble especially if they can't meet the expectation of those people suggested those methods they think can help BFG to rise. But since they have good plans release recently then I guess this one should better to follow by those people still have BFG since maybe that one can give them a chance to earn. But they really need to post here to post some updates and answer questions of people so they can get back the trust of people since for sure they need bitcointalk as they can get a huge market here for their token and lots of people are losing their trust or interest for it so maybe its time to do some action to make those people to decide that BFG token is worth to add in their portfolios.

That's when they should be better at it when they've been receiving a lot of criticism. That's the opportunity that they can do to get the trust of their community once again.

Yes, that's likely the main task that he has to do when they've got some updates. But limited into it only and don't have to reply to the discussions that are being done by the community.

Accepting it is one thing, not being able to accept is another. I mean you can suggest something that you think is obvious, but they would already know that they should do that while not being able to do it at all, because they would lack the funds to do it. I have even met with casino owners who did not have coders in their employment, they just hired people freelance to build their casinos and then that was it, of course it wasn't as big of a website as this, but I am just telling it for example purposes.

Betfury may get some suggestions from people, but the reason why they are not doing it could be because of fund issues, it should definitely be something that could take sometime for them to reach something like that, hence why they may see it but not do it because of this.

Maybe the casino cannot explain the problems that have been reported one by one because there are many reports of criticism and suggestions regarding systems, services and other things related to gambling, each casino has a blog page to update everything for regular updates and the team can explain the latest updates as a response From criticism and suggestions, I think the right solution is for the team to post updates to improve the system and platform services to answer feedback from several user reports.

Sadly, They probably don’t value forum anymore that makes them easily abandoned it after focusing on social media like X that is full of crappy bot account. Also they can manipulate impressions in there by faking reacts and availing SEO services.

Not all casino that started in the forum wants to stay here for long term. Probably they think that marketing here is useless since they already stop signature campaigns too by the time they decided to stop replying here. Their PR is just using this ANN thread to casually bump it with their announcement.

Casinos should be able to accept suggestions or criticism from users on this forum because it is all about improving their services to their users. Users may often criticize harshly, but it aims to show appreciation for the casino. Users want to provide the best suggestions for their casino so that the casino can develop even better.

If casinos can accept suggestions or criticism and immediately improve them, users will see the difference. And that difference will make users know that the casino is serious about providing the best service to its users. To answer problems that occur, each casino can provide answers to users via email, chat or private messages.

The casino can also explain in public that, one by one, the problems that occur are being resolved. When a case is resolved, the casino can provide clarification in public and the user concerned can also provide clarification. That will give many people confidence in the casino that the casino is trying to provide the best service for them.

And that is an attitude that should no longer exist, because when things are not done well they have to serve the users of bitcointalk, because this is a serious forum, with experienced users and the fact that they do not respond to anything is something that It's not good at all, they should do it because at least I consider it a lack of respect, if they have problems with some users that do not have to affect everyone, then how can you recommend a casino if they are not even able to respond here, in my case No, I recommended it before because they had a different attitude, but how can you defend a casino like this?

Most of the casino hate the fact when user always criticizing them while they can’t do anything about it due to the limited funds they have or different priorities that’s why it’s easy for them to ignore the communication on public rather than answering same question all over again.

Also they have an issue before regarding their affiliate which took a long time before it was solved, that time Betfury becomes completely silent on dealing with forum matters.

You are completely right and I totally agree with you, at a time in the past, I was wondering if those accounts always posting updates and never engaging in any form of discussion on the same thread were bots, I wondered if it was possible to run some kind of bot that will automatically post for a user here on the forum, but then, I later realized that those account are created solely for PR on this forum nothing more, and I must say That the people behind those PR account have been really good at what they do, I mean, making sure never to engage in any discussions, even when they are quoted and asked questions concerning an announcement they just posted, they still will never reply, on one hand, i actually at times, get agree at such behavior, but on the other hand, I do commend them for being so professional with their job, which is to post announcements and nothing more.

Anyways, it's unfortunate that most of this casinos have lost interest in communicating with users on this forum, they rather will prefer the user contact them through their customer care support, what could you suggest is wrong? Is it that users of this forum are always too hostile or what?

The steps with BFG were always right but they could not keep the value of their token in the market even if they kept everything right. Because people get their tokens by gambling as well as by staking and get a huge amount of tokens which they cash out by selling the tokens in addition to gambling.  On the other hand, investors or traders did not show much interest in buying tokens from the exchange. However, despite the fall in token prices, the Betfurry casino site remains quite popular and has a large number of gamblers.

Only the PR guy is the only one doing post here using their official account. They already lost interest on communicating here ever since they received a lot of criticism about poor performance of their token even though they use the forum before during their crowdfunding phase.

I think the current user of Betfury account is just instructed to post announcements and don’t involve on any post here. This is same function of other PR accounts like on Stake and Frebitco.in which they don’t reply on comment.

I've seen it, but i really how it would affect the tokenomics in deflationary way. Allowing tracking for team's tokens is good, but why this wasn't an option from the start?

Team locked their BFG Staking pool for 3 years? Is that the major change? They get way more rewards for holding them then by dumping with this liquidity, so it would be stupid from them not to lock them?
And weren't they locked before to staking pool? I am surprised if not. Trying to convince users to commit to lock their tokens as a deflationary measure is just weird.

Liquidy they put on liquidity on crypto exchanges technically is healthy, but it's also suppressing moon as there's going to be strong sell wall.

And they like to use the term buyback even though they are "buying" from their own pile they saved for that purpose. That pile serves no purpose what so ever on top of that. It's there to signal that they are technically affecting the total supply, even though those tokens weren't ever going to be circulating or staking, so they shouldn't even be counted to total supply. After this pile (treasury pool) is done been burned, burnings from their behalf will end i suppose. How did that help, no one knows.

Wasn't their tokens locked before, or did they just add more locking time for them?

Just a few post above us and you'd see that they've posted those updates. That's what they've come up and I only have commented those details from them.

They should also have some conversation and get to reply to the interesting posts of other users on their own thread.

It's best to hear out from those actual investors. I don't hold it and I think that we've got forum members here that still holds their token in hope that they'd able to recover from what has happened to them.

What currently happened here is good so if they could able to do those satisfying things that can attract or satisfy those who's following or could able to see their developments made. For now its hard to conclude that there's something will be great to happen after they made that action since still the community will still the one who decide if they are impressed or not since for sure they are expecting a lot from BFG for many months and they want to see BFG team to do more good decisions so that they can get earn something from them for their long term support from their old token. Those locking will somehow give some confidence to investors that there's nothing bad will happen for locking that volume.

Hopefully, BFG's new tokenomics will help boost the token price. And the BetFury team has taken the first step in that direction by confirming their intentions in developing BFG. Today, 1,OOO,OOO,OOO of the team's tokens have been locked for 3 years.

View the contract address: https://bscscan.com/address/0x6B06bFd96eE684eC1625264B973c652a13d97f78#readContract%23F2

Announcement: https://t.me/Betfury/4821041

At first glance, that announcement about the new BFG tokenomics and the updated deflationary strategy looks promising. So, I'm inclined to think that the community should give a chance to the Betfury team, and drawing any conclusions about the new tokenomics as well as the impact of the updated deflationary strategy on the BFG price only makes sense closer to the end of this year.

What's this? I haven't seen any other plan then current one where they are burning their own tokens that weren't ever touching the market in the first place, so of course that doesn't do anything for the price. And now they want users to lock their tokens themselves which i found hilarious. Like raising their hands up and saying "it's up to you now, we did all we could".

I don't know which is worse; their lying, inability to plane game theory for tokenomics, looking down on their users and thinking they are stupid enough not to see trough this scam. That their users woldn't realize that team doesn't care. Or their intolerance for any criticism.

If Yobit was a casino, it would be planned as something like this.

Its undeniable that this is what people like to see so maybe what he meant is the short time hype what possible could bring on those news that BFG will be listed on a big exchange. For sure there's a lot of people like that to happen that's why this maybe can give them some good points from investors if at least they could able to make it happen. Although there's nothing guarantee that people will accumulate because what they want to happen is already there. Many expect to much from BFG before because they see a good potential but right now which some of those old investors got disappointed for what happen here I guess they still in doubt to participate since they don't know what will happen to BFG if they could able to perform well or they became stable just like what happen to them for so many months.

Although BFG is really good its just what action they made did not sell from other people here since maybe they really expect a lot and think that there's something good to happen but some of them got disappointed since their expectation for BFG has not been achieve for many months of waiting.

I haven't read entirely about their new tokenomics but it seems that they're aware of what the investors want to have. About exchange and listing, I think that they have it on planned as they want to add liquidity on exchanges as mentioned on their new tokenomics.

They have added some burning and buyback mechanism but it's not going to be felt as soon as possible after they've released that. So, with their update, it's giving some light of hope from those investors that have lost a bit of hope about BFG.

Having a burning mechanism and locking team dev's tokens, looks welcoming change or this was the model before?