Topic: BFL fucked us over again (redux) - page 46. (Read 100109 times)

3 pages deep, its already out of hand. 

But yeah, I tried to stay with that thread, but has anyone gotten to know if after the ceizing of their offices plus being courts finally.

Anyone gotten the update if hes going to serve time? or something.

Might as well throw in the TSA: Transportation Security Administration too...

Next to the FTC, FBI, DoJ, AG, IRS, USPS and what not, it makes for a nice little Alphabet soup... 

What a shame. This was the only thread that was somewhat interesting in the Hardware forum. Nothing is going on in the hardware space atm.

Edited for brevity, originals available upon request.

Thank you KelticFox, if only we had more members like you.

Sometimes it feels like you have to push people to do something this beneficial to their own good.

http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/
http://www.hse.gov.uk/
http://www.ftc.gov
http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm
http://www.tsa.gov/

I am unsure if that is true or not. I do recall Psychotic Boy banned a member. I don't recall any Admin being involved in that episode. He wasn't even the Mod of that board that he used his moderators powers over.

I do sense your inner clown (that is a good thing) so I know you are a good mod.

One last question, Inaba and BFL_Josh have deprived individuals of millions in their delayed refunds. Documented fact. (non-disputable)

Question: Has anything been done against either of these two accounts: BFL_Josh and Inaba?
Have they been suspended? Banned? Anything?

You have people committing far lessor offenses against Bitcointalk and it's population and somehow they result in a Ban very quickly. What the deal with this?

=====================

Another fact, these incidents with BFL and their refund (or their reasonable fulfillment issues) have happened no less than 3 times with the same events repeating themselves year after year. Still, they somehow continue as if the Admins above are completely blind to the obvious facts of how these people impact Bitcoin or it's Bitcointalk members.

If BFL were to open a new exciting thread in the hardware section to announce the sale of some new hardware with the same premise (pre-order, OR a request for customer funds with a wait time greater than 7 days before 100% fulfillment); would the Admins and Mods allow this to happen for the 4th or 5th time AGAIN?

Only serious question with serious responses PLEASE.

Docket updated.

http://ia802308.us.archive.org/32/items/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.docket.html

http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.291.0.pdf
http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531/gov.uscourts.mowd.117531.291.1.pdf

LOL. Awesome, bruh. Keep us updated!

You mean like this?


And mods don't ban, admins do, all we need to do is point admins at behaviour and let them decide. Please don't insinuate I'm trying to protect bfl in any fucking way. I left the thread in hardware for much longer than it deserved to be there because it had started before I became a mod and people were looking for that thread there even though it didn't belong, in the hope it was somehow useful. A few times I posted on that thread to try and get people back onto meaningful discourse but it kept getting derailed. I didn't delete any of the last few posts as it was an unsalvageable mess. Take a look at it for yourself and try and convince yourself it was in any way a mining hardware thread.

I know, bud. But it wasn't entirely off the mark either.

It is a known fact now that some of them are reading our pm's and conducting searches on terms like BFL...  What are they trying to find out and to whom are they reporting to? Can you search pm's without a warrant? Maybe they should be asked about it.

Hear, hear!!!

I find it totally Unacceptable too...

PS: and also put this "up for [META] discussion" (again!) at: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/deleted-posts-in-the-hardware-bfl-thread-double-standards-and-hypocrisy-914998

On the topic of Bruno, it would be interesting if he fainted in court and has to request medical intervention. Hopefully screwing the date of the appearance by a few months and a few expensive lawyer payments between then and later.

Whoa, I think I dozed off a bit there while writing on my keyboard.

Edit: Hmm, interesting delirious episode I had. It brings up an interesting point. Will there be a well funded BFL with cash to spend between now and June? Who knows?

Edit2: I suppose that whole receivership payment stalemate will probably turn side ways by the end of April at the longest. You know, recieverships do not like to work for free and get upset when they don't get their bonanza payments on time. Hopefully, they are retaining enough refunds to pull them through to see the end of the FTC case. One can only hope for the best.

I would also avoid using labels like "facts" as BFL would contest any facts with their own made up "bullshit". And by bullshit, I mean whatever it is they legitimately believe to be based on truth.

(in theory, or in a hypothesis, in otherwords I am not entirely sure if that is the case or not, purely speculation,  )

You might want to use a Google word document. You can collaborate online and restrict editing privledges to certain individuals. Everyone else could only read it. I have seen people use it for independent korean news. It works effectively from what I can remember.

hi lleroy
i have read about bfl problem since 2012...
the thread posted from you, was started on 09 March 2013, 04:37:13.

...and there were problems even before.

so... i do not know if BFL is scam..
i have never buy at BFL...
but for sure... i will never check it

What a crock of shit!!! Gleb does what Bruno does,you mods know how he is....& you mods ban him for 5 days...no warning,just an outright ban & lock the thread 

So now the "BFL story" gets buried deep in this forum........that locked thread is/was very important to keep newbies aware of BFL.

Now it will sink into oblivion...BFL wins...bitcointalk forum mods win...& those of us who know what BFL is up to & trying to expose them lose 

Hope you mods choke on all that BTC BFL gave you for advertising 

That was originally a Josh post ripping on Bruno that I edited for absurd purposes.

Just a reminder of what we're dealing with here (thanks Xian01; https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9398683):

I will talk to him about it. Also he really should contact the court or the FTC and tell them he believes they are trying to silence by using the court improperly. I can't imagine it would look good for the company if it were found they were trying to silence critics though the legal system since just doing on their's and other's websites isn't working.