Part two is in
this bet. Find any one Las Vegas bookie that took the equivalent of 460 BTC in a single bet this year and we may talk business. As things are so far however, BitBet is the king of the hill, in no small part
because it did the right thing when confronted with you derps.
Welcome back ! I thought at first you'd decided to leave this and walk away but then I realised you'd not posted so must have been on a break.
However I would like to point out that the bet in question isn't much of a bet. The current charts and the miners themselves even back in December seem to believe that this will be easily cleared by the end of Feb.
Also when tracing the transactions back that bet originates from a wallet that had 10k back in April. At first I thought it's just someone with money to burn but it turns out that the 70 BTC bet on the "No" side traces back to the same wallet. Maybe this is a fluke and the coins were sold between two individuals who just happened to bet against each other months later but that seems a bit unlikely.
If anyone would like to recheck my effort
this 70 BTC bet (oddly placed at precisely midnight) and
this 461 BTC bet both trace back to
this walletIt
appears that someone is betting against themselves.
There is a more controversial possibility but I'll leave other people to figure that one out.
There is no guarantee of this of course and I wouldn't put any money on it simply because it would be tough to prove.
It's probably worth stating that I have no interest in if bitbet succeeds or fails.
As before grammar and punctuation corrections are welcome